Vivmark Residential is a real estate investment trust focused on multi-family apartment communities. It owns and operates apartment buildings and leases individual units to residents, usually on terms of about a year. Revenue comes almost entirely from rent paid by tenants, along with smaller amounts from fees and other property income. Occupancy, local rent levels and operating costs such as taxes and maintenance shape the results.
Over the last twelve months Vivmark Residential reported revenue of $3.1 billion, which was flat over three years, at 0.0% a year. Its operating margin is 39.4% and its return on invested capital is 9%. Net debt to EBITDA is 1.2 times. Shareholders receive a dividend, yielding 4.4%. The X-Ray Score is 62 out of 100, a summary of these measures.
52-wk range $57.57 – $71.50Volume 3,546,134Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$24.4B
52-week range$57.57 – $71.50
Volume (last day)3,546,134
P/E (TTM)28.1
EBIT / EV yield4.7%
Free-cash-flow yield–
Dividend yield4.4%
Revenue (TTM)$3.1B
Net income (TTM)$875M
Operating margin39.4%
Return on capital9.3%
Debt incl. leases$1.5B
Cash & securities$36M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$75middle half of models $63 – $66
Fair+17.3% to fair value
Average of the 5 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $64
Undervalued < $63Fair $63 – $90Overvalued > $90
P/B multiple
$66
P/S multiple
$65
P/FFO multiple
$63
P/AFFO multiple
$61
Dividend discount, stable
$119
Dividend discount, multi-stage · not used
$173
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Real Estate peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationStrong
81/100
Cheap against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield4.7%
Fair value vs price1.2×
GrowthWeak
43/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)0.0%
EPS growth (3y)12.8%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityWeak
45/100
Earns lower returns on its capital than most peers.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital9.3%
Operating margin39.4%
Financial healthStrong
82/100
Balance sheet looks strong: debt is well covered.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score8 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.2×
Interest cover3.9×
DividendsWeak
49/100
Dividend is modest or less certain than peers.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield4.4%
Dividend growth3.9%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+4.1%Mar '25
+4.7%Jun '25
+4.6%Sep '25
+2.0%Dec '25
+2.5%Mar '26
+2.1%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $785M, diluted EPS $0.30.
Other Multi-Family Residential REITs companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Vivmark Residential
Strengthsinside the company
Earnings per share have compounded at 12.8% a year over three years.
Passes 8 of the 9 Piotroski tests, which points to improving profitability, funding and efficiency.
Weaknessesinside the company
No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
No specific opportunity is visible in our valuation, sector or growth data.
Threatsvaluation and setting
Our Market Compass rates the backdrop for Real Estate as unfavourable.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare VMRK with peers and sector
Medians of 4 Multi-Family Residential REITs peers and of 28 Real Estate stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): ESS48, MAA47, UDR50, CPT58.
Metric
VMRK
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
62
49
51
Valuation
81
56
52
Growth
43
43
56
Profitability
45
57
53
Financial health
82
40
53
Dividends
49
46
47
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Real Estate
VMRK ranks #3 of 29 in Real Estate and #1 of 5 in Multi-Family Residential REITs by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for VMRK
Each factor is rated by where VMRK stands among the 29 Real Estate stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 5 Good · 9 Average · 3 Bad of 17Growth: 0 · 1 · 2Profitability: 1 · 3 · 0Financial strength: 3 · 0 · 0Valuation: 0 · 3 · 1Cash flow: 1 · 2 · 0
Factor
VMRK
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+0.0%
Badbeats 9%
+6.8%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+3.8%
Badbeats 33%
+5.1%
+3.7%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+12.8%
Averagebeats 63%
−1.9%
–
–
Profitability
Operating margin
39.4%
Averagebeats 60%
34.3%
45.9%
▼ Worse
Net margin
28.0%
Goodbeats 71%
21.5%
34.8%
▼ Worse
Return on invested capital
9.3%
Averagebeats 60%
7.5%
–
–
Return on equity
8.3%
Averagebeats 60%
7.3%
9.4%
≈ In line
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
1.2x
Goodbeats 81%
4.6x
6.3x
▲ Better
Interest cover
3.9x
Goodbeats 69%
3.4x
4.8x
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
8 / 9
Goodbeats 91%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
27.9x
Averagebeats 63%
32.1x
27.1x
≈ In line
Price / book
2.3x
Averagebeats 60%
2.6x
2.2x
≈ In line
Price / sales
7.8x
Averagebeats 36%
7.0x
8.3x
≈ In line
EV / EBITDA
21.1x
Badbeats 19%
18.6x
26.9x
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
50.0%
Goodbeats 67%
44.6%
52.8%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
1.79
Averagebeats 41%
1.91
1.52
▲ Better
Accruals (lower is better)
−3.4%
Averagebeats 43%
−3.7%
–
–
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 6 Good · ● 4 Average · ● 1 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashAverage
Risk models
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Bad
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Net debt / EBITDAGood
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceGood
EBIT / EV yieldGood
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginAverage
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 62/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$2.5B
$3.1B
$2.9B
$3.0B
$3.1B
Operating income
$1.7B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.4B
$1.5B
Net income
$1.3B
$777M
$835M
$1.0B
$1.1B
Operating cash flow
$1.3B
$1.5B
$1.5B
$1.6B
$1.6B
Operating margin
68.0%
36.1%
40.4%
45.9%
47.8%
Free cash flow
–
–
–
–
–
Diluted EPS
$3.54
$2.05
$2.20
$2.72
$2.94
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
10 bullish · 1 neutral · 5 bearish
Weekly
Bullish
8 bullish · 1 neutral · 3 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
61.52
Bullish
EMA 10
61.64
Bullish
SMA 20
60.78
Bullish
EMA 20
61.46
Bullish
SMA 50
62.70
Bullish
EMA 50
62.44
Bullish
SMA 100
64.59
Bearish
EMA 100
63.14
Bullish
SMA 200
62.69
Bullish
EMA 200
62.95
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
62.22
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-0.08
Bearish
Momentum (12)
5.30
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
97.05
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-2.95
Bearish
CCI (20)
225.0
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
60.67
S2
61.31
S1
62.44
Pivot
63.08
R1
64.21
R2
64.85
R3
65.98
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
2.80 USD
Yield on today's price
4.41%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
0.7030
0.7030
0.7030
0.6930
0.6930
0.6930
0.6930
0.6750
0.6750
0.6750
0.6750
0.6630
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in VMRK among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
VMRK stock splits
VMRK has split its stock once since 2001. The latest was a 2-for-1 split on 12 Oct 2001.