Digital Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates data centres, the buildings that house servers, storage and network equipment. It leases space, power and cooling to cloud companies, technology firms, telecom carriers and enterprises, and offers interconnection services that link customers' networks to each other. Its facilities are spread across the Americas, Europe, Asia and Africa.
Rents and interconnection fees make up the bulk of the company's income. Revenue is $6.3 billion over the last twelve months, rising 9.2% a year across the last three years. The operating margin is 11.5%, and the business earns a profit of 3% on the capital invested in it. The dividend yield is 2.9%, and the data sheet carries no net debt figure for the company. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 37 out of 100.
52-wk range $146.23 – $208.14Volume 2,254,717Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$60.4B
52-week range$146.23 – $208.14
Volume (last day)2,254,717
P/E (TTM)43.2
EBIT / EV yield1.2%
Free-cash-flow yield–
Dividend yield2.9%
Revenue (TTM)$6.3B
Net income (TTM)$1.4B
Operating margin11.5%
Return on capital2.6%
Debt incl. leasesData missing
Cash & securities$2.4B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$167middle half of models $162 – $170
Fair−2.3% to fair value
Average of the 4 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Real Estate peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
8/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield1.2%
Fair value vs price1.0×
GrowthFair
64/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)9.2%
EPS growth (3y)47.7%
Growth consistency80%
ProfitabilityWeak
27/100
Earns lower returns on its capital than most peers.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital2.6%
Operating margin11.5%
Financial healthFair
57/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score8 / 9
Interest cover1.6×
DividendsWeak
41/100
Dividend is modest or less certain than peers.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield2.9%
Dividend growth6.0%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+4.8%Dec '24
+5.7%Mar '25
+10.1%Jun '25
+10.2%Sep '25
+13.8%Dec '25
+16.2%Mar '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $1.6B, diluted EPS $0.46.
Earnings per share have compounded at 47.7% a year over three years.
Passes 8 of the 9 Piotroski tests, which points to improving profitability, funding and efficiency.
Weaknessesinside the company
Return on invested capital is only 2.6% (median 7.7% for sector peers), so the business earns little above its cost of capital.
Operating margin of 11.5% is thin against 36.0% for sector peers.
Operating profit covers interest only 1.6x.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
No specific opportunity is visible in our valuation, sector or growth data.
Threatsvaluation and setting
Trades at 43.7x earnings, 37% above the 31.9x median of sector peers, so the price already assumes better results.
Our Market Compass rates the backdrop for Real Estate as unfavourable.
The price trend is down on the daily and weekly signals.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare DLR with peers and sector
Medians of 28 Real Estate peers and of 28 Real Estate stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): WELL48, PLD43, EQIX51, AMT53, SPG42, PSA52.
Metric
DLR
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
37
52
52
Valuation
8
53
53
Growth
64
56
56
Profitability
27
53
53
Financial health
57
53
53
Dividends
41
48
48
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Real Estate
DLR ranks #29 of 29 in Real Estate by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for DLR
Each factor is rated by where DLR stands among the 29 Real Estate stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 3 Good · 6 Average · 7 Bad of 16Growth: 2 · 1 · 0Profitability: 0 · 2 · 2Financial strength: 1 · 0 · 1Valuation: 0 · 1 · 3Cash flow: 0 · 2 · 1
Factor
DLR
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+9.2%
Averagebeats 64%
+6.8%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+10.0%
Goodbeats 81%
+5.1%
+10.0%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+47.7%
Goodbeats 90%
−1.9%
–
–
Profitability
Operating margin
11.5%
Badbeats 10%
34.3%
10.8%
≈ In line
Net margin
21.8%
Averagebeats 53%
21.5%
17.4%
▲ Better
Return on invested capital
2.6%
Badbeats 6%
7.5%
–
–
Return on equity
5.9%
Averagebeats 37%
7.3%
5.0%
≈ In line
Financial strength
Interest cover
1.6x
Badbeats 6%
3.4x
1.5x
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
8 / 9
Goodbeats 91%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
43.7x
Badbeats 23%
32.1x
43.8x
≈ In line
Price / book
2.6x
Averagebeats 48%
2.6x
2.3x
≈ In line
Price / sales
9.5x
Badbeats 19%
7.0x
8.8x
≈ In line
EV / EBITDA
22.2x
Badbeats 10%
18.6x
–
–
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
40.1%
Averagebeats 36%
44.6%
38.4%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
1.84
Averagebeats 48%
1.91
1.84
≈ In line
Accruals (lower is better)
−2.4%
Badbeats 26%
−3.7%
–
–
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 2 Good · ● 1 Average · ● 7 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Risk models
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Good
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyBad
Balance sheet
Interest coverBad
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalBad
Operating marginBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 27/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$4.4B
$4.7B
$5.5B
$5.6B
$6.1B
Operating income
$694M
$590M
$524M
$472M
$658M
Net income
$1.7B
$380M
$950M
$588M
$1.3B
Operating cash flow
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$2.3B
$2.4B
Operating margin
15.7%
12.6%
9.6%
8.5%
10.8%
Free cash flow
–
–
–
–
–
Diluted EPS
$5.94
$1.11
$2.88
$1.61
$3.58
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Strongly bearish
1 bullish · 3 neutral · 12 bearish
Weekly
Bearish
3 bullish · 1 neutral · 8 bearish
Monthly
Bullish
5 bullish · 1 neutral · 2 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
175.5
Bearish
EMA 10
175.2
Bearish
SMA 20
177.0
Bearish
EMA 20
177.1
Bearish
SMA 50
183.0
Bearish
EMA 50
180.7
Bearish
SMA 100
183.5
Bearish
EMA 100
182.0
Bearish
SMA 200
180.7
Bearish
EMA 200
179.3
Bearish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
39.60
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-2.47
Bearish
Momentum (12)
-7.42
Bearish
Stochastic %K (14)
21.03
Neutral
Williams %R (14)
-78.97
Neutral
CCI (20)
-151.4
Bullish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
161.2
S2
164.9
S1
167.9
Pivot
171.6
R1
174.6
R2
178.2
R3
181.3
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
4.88 USD
Yield on today's price
2.85%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
1.2200
1.2200
1.2200
1.2200
1.2200
1.2200
1.2200
1.2200
1.2200
1.2200
1.2200
1.2200
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in DLR among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.