Crown Castle owns and operates communications infrastructure in the United States, including cell towers, small cells and fiber networks. It leases space on this infrastructure to wireless carriers and other customers that need to transmit signals and data. Revenue comes mainly from long-term lease agreements with a small number of large carriers, so the activity and financial health of those customers are important to its results.
Revenue of $4.2 billion was recorded for the latest twelve months; sales fell 15.2% a year over the past three years. Crown Castle Inc. converts that into an operating margin of 47.7%. Return on invested capital comes to 13%. Net debt to EBITDA is 6.5 times. A dividend is paid, with a yield of 5.4%, and the X-Ray Score is 46 out of 100.
52-wk range $65.32 – $100.50Volume 6,211,449Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$34.2B
52-week range$65.32 – $100.50
Volume (last day)6,211,449
P/E (TTM)39.9
EBIT / EV yield3.9%
Free-cash-flow yield7.0%
Dividend yield5.4%
Revenue (TTM)$4.2B
Net income (TTM)$862M
Operating margin47.7%
Return on capital12.8%
Debt incl. leases$18.2B
Cash & securities$1.0B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$79middle half of models $77 – $81
Fair+0.4% to fair value
Average of the 3 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $79
Undervalued < $67Fair $67 – $96Overvalued > $96
P/S multiple
$83
P/FFO multiple
$79
P/AFFO multiple
$76
Dividend discount, stable · not used
$168
Dividend discount, multi-stage · not used
$217
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Real Estate peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationFair
54/100
Priced about in line with its sector.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield3.9%
Free-cash-flow yield7.0%
Fair value vs price1.0×
GrowthWeak
18/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)-15.2%
EPS growth (3y)-36.0%
Growth consistency10%
ProfitabilityStrong
80/100
Earns high returns on the capital it uses.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital12.8%
Operating margin47.7%
Gross profitability18.9%
Financial healthWeak
22/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score5 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA6.5×
Interest cover2.1×
DividendsWeak
42/100
Dividend is modest or less certain than peers.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield5.4%
Dividends vs free cash flow77%
Dividend growth-7.2%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
-4.8%Mar '25
-4.2%Jun '25
-4.3%Sep '25
-4.3%Dec '25
-4.8%Mar '26
-4.9%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $1.0B, diluted EPS $0.22.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare CCI with peers and sector
Medians of 28 Real Estate peers and of 28 Real Estate stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): WELL48, PLD43, EQIX51, AMT53, SPG42, DLR37.
Metric
CCI
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
46
52
52
Valuation
54
52
52
Growth
18
56
56
Profitability
80
50
50
Financial health
22
56
56
Dividends
42
48
48
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Real Estate
CCI ranks #22 of 29 in Real Estate by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for CCI
Each factor is rated by where CCI stands among the 29 Real Estate stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 9 Good · 3 Average · 8 Bad of 20Growth: 0 · 0 · 3Profitability: 3 · 1 · 0Financial strength: 0 · 0 · 4Valuation: 1 · 2 · 1Cash flow: 4 · 0 · 0Efficiency: 1 · 0 · 0
Factor
CCI
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
−15.2%
Badbeats 2%
+6.8%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
−4.4%
Badbeats 2%
+5.1%
−4.4%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
−36.0%
Badbeats 17%
−1.9%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
97.5%
Goodbeats 99%
47.1%
69.2%
▲ Better
Operating margin
47.7%
Goodbeats 85%
34.3%
44.3%
≈ In line
Net margin
20.7%
Averagebeats 43%
21.5%
17.3%
▲ Better
Return on invested capital
12.8%
Goodbeats 85%
7.5%
–
–
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
6.5x
Badbeats 14%
4.6x
7.9x
▲ Better
Interest cover
2.1x
Badbeats 15%
3.4x
2.4x
≈ In line
Current ratio
0.52
Badbeats 5%
1.22
0.45
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
5 / 9
Badbeats 28%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
39.7x
Averagebeats 34%
32.1x
58.9x
▲ Better
Price / sales
8.2x
Badbeats 33%
7.0x
9.1x
≈ In line
EV / EBITDA
19.3x
Averagebeats 40%
18.6x
22.8x
▲ Better
Free cash flow yield
7.0%
Goodbeats 81%
4.1%
5.8%
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
57.8%
Goodbeats 84%
44.6%
60.9%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
3.04
Goodbeats 77%
1.91
2.31
▲ Better
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+22.4%
Goodbeats 69%
+11.7%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−8.2%
Goodbeats 98%
−3.7%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
16 days
Goodbeats 89%
53 days
31 days
▲ Better
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 5 Good · ● 2 Average · ● 9 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Free-cash-flow yieldGood
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreBad
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Bad
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Bad
Growth consistencyBad
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDABad
Interest coverBad
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginGood
Gross profitabilityGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 51/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$6.3B
$7.0B
$4.7B
$4.5B
$4.3B
Operating income
$2.0B
$2.4B
$2.1B
$2.1B
$2.1B
Net income
$1.1B
$1.7B
$1.5B
−$3.9B
$444M
Operating cash flow
$2.8B
$2.9B
$3.1B
$2.9B
$3.1B
Operating margin
31.6%
34.7%
44.3%
47.5%
48.7%
Free cash flow
$1.6B
$1.6B
$2.9B
$2.8B
$2.9B
Diluted EPS
$2.53
$3.86
$3.46
$-8.98
$1.01
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
9 bullish · 4 neutral · 3 bearish
Weekly
Neutral
5 bullish · 1 neutral · 6 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bearish
0 bullish · 1 neutral · 7 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
80.15
Bearish
EMA 10
78.43
Bullish
SMA 20
73.83
Bullish
EMA 20
76.23
Bullish
SMA 50
73.80
Bullish
EMA 50
74.98
Bullish
SMA 100
76.60
Bullish
EMA 100
76.54
Bullish
SMA 200
80.41
Bearish
EMA 200
79.77
Bearish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
60.15
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
2.33
Bullish
Momentum (12)
15.45
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
75.31
Neutral
Williams %R (14)
-24.69
Neutral
CCI (20)
50.44
Neutral
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
72.50
S2
74.40
S1
76.61
Pivot
78.51
R1
80.72
R2
82.62
R3
84.83
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
4.25 USD
Yield on today's price
5.39%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
1.0630
1.0630
1.0630
1.0630
1.0630
1.0630
1.5650
1.5650
1.5650
1.5650
1.5650
1.5650
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in CCI among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.