CBRE Group is a commercial real estate services and investment firm. It helps clients lease, acquire, dispose of, manage and finance properties, and it operates facilities for corporate occupiers. Revenue comes from brokerage commissions, fees for property and facilities management, project management fees, and investment management and development activities. Transaction volumes in leasing and capital markets can move its results noticeably with the property cycle.
The X-Ray Score for Cbre Group, Inc. is 57 out of 100. Revenue over the last twelve months was $43.6 billion, and it expanded at 9.6% a year across three years. The business shows an operating margin of 4.5% and a return on invested capital of 10%. Leverage, measured as net debt to EBITDA, is 2.4 times. The company does not pay a dividend.
52-wk range $121.69 – $174.27Volume 5,522,017Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$38.6B
52-week range$121.69 – $174.27
Volume (last day)5,522,017
P/E (TTM)30.1
EBIT / EV yield4.4%
Free-cash-flow yield2.4%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$43.6B
Net income (TTM)$1.3B
Operating margin4.5%
Return on capital10.4%
Debt incl. leases$8.1B
Cash & securities$1.5B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$140middle half of models $112 – $163
Fair+6.6% to fair value
Average of the 11 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Real Estate peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
49/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield4.4%
Free-cash-flow yield2.4%
Fair value vs price1.1×
GrowthFair
58/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)9.6%
EPS growth (3y)-3.5%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityFair
58/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital10.4%
Operating margin4.5%
Gross profitability26.4%
Financial healthFair
64/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score5 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA2.4×
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+11.8%Mar '25
+15.8%Jun '25
+13.5%Sep '25
+11.8%Dec '25
+18.6%Mar '26
+15.5%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $11.2B, diluted EPS $0.69.
Other Real Estate Services companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Cbre Group, Inc.
Strengthsinside the company
Return on invested capital is 10.4%, against a median of 7.3% for sector peers.
Operating profit covers interest 50x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Weaknessesinside the company
Operating margin of 4.5% is thin against 36.0% for sector peers.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
No specific opportunity is visible in our valuation, sector or growth data.
Threatsvaluation and setting
Our Market Compass rates the backdrop for Real Estate as unfavourable.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare CBRE with peers and sector
Medians of 28 Real Estate peers and of 28 Real Estate stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): WELL48, PLD43, EQIX51, AMT53, SPG42, DLR37.
Metric
CBRE
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
57
51
51
Valuation
49
53
53
Growth
58
56
56
Profitability
58
50
50
Financial health
63
53
53
Dividends
–
47
47
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Real Estate
CBRE ranks #8 of 29 in Real Estate by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for CBRE
Each factor is rated by where CBRE stands among the 29 Real Estate stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 7 Good · 4 Average · 11 Bad of 22Growth: 2 · 1 · 0Profitability: 2 · 0 · 3Financial strength: 2 · 1 · 1Valuation: 1 · 2 · 2Cash flow: 0 · 0 · 4Efficiency: 0 · 0 · 1
Factor
CBRE
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+9.6%
Goodbeats 67%
+6.8%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+13.4%
Goodbeats 88%
+5.1%
+12.0%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
−3.5%
Averagebeats 48%
−1.9%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
18.4%
Badbeats 10%
47.1%
19.6%
≈ In line
Operating margin
4.5%
Badbeats 6%
34.3%
4.3%
≈ In line
Net margin
3.0%
Badbeats 9%
21.5%
3.1%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
10.4%
Goodbeats 81%
7.5%
–
–
Return on equity
15.5%
Goodbeats 83%
7.3%
13.0%
▲ Better
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
2.4x
Goodbeats 75%
4.6x
1.3x
▼ Worse
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 92%
3.4x
–
–
Current ratio
1.14
Averagebeats 44%
1.22
1.09
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
5 / 9
Badbeats 28%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
29.6x
Averagebeats 59%
32.1x
29.5x
≈ In line
Price / book
4.6x
Badbeats 17%
2.6x
4.3x
≈ In line
Price / sales
0.9x
Goodbeats 98%
7.0x
1.1x
≈ In line
EV / EBITDA
16.7x
Averagebeats 60%
18.6x
18.0x
≈ In line
Free cash flow yield
2.4%
Badbeats 23%
4.1%
3.5%
▼ Worse
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
2.1%
Badbeats 5%
44.6%
3.9%
▼ Worse
Cash from operations / net income
1.05
Badbeats 9%
1.91
1.29
▼ Worse
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
−4.5%
Badbeats 21%
+11.7%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−0.2%
Badbeats 9%
−3.7%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
73 days
Badbeats 20%
53 days
71 days
≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 8 Good · ● 3 Average · ● 5 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Good
Piotroski F-ScoreBad
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Bad
Revenue growth (3y)Good
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Net debt / EBITDAGood
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginBad
Gross profitabilityGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 53/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$27.7B
$30.8B
$31.9B
$35.8B
$40.6B
Operating income
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.1B
$1.4B
$1.8B
Net income
$1.8B
$1.4B
$986M
$968M
$1.2B
Operating cash flow
$2.4B
$1.6B
$480M
$1.7B
$1.6B
Operating margin
5.9%
4.9%
3.5%
4.0%
4.3%
Free cash flow
$2.2B
$1.4B
$175M
$1.4B
$1.2B
Diluted EPS
$5.41
$4.29
$3.15
$3.14
$3.85
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bearish
2 bullish · 4 neutral · 10 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bearish
1 bullish · 1 neutral · 10 bearish
Monthly
Bearish
2 bullish · 1 neutral · 5 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
132.0
Bearish
EMA 10
132.3
Bearish
SMA 20
131.1
Bullish
EMA 20
133.0
Bearish
SMA 50
139.6
Bearish
EMA 50
136.5
Bearish
SMA 100
139.2
Bearish
EMA 100
139.0
Bearish
SMA 200
142.9
Bearish
EMA 200
141.4
Bearish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
45.14
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-1.57
Bearish
Momentum (12)
0.44
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
53.19
Neutral
Williams %R (14)
-46.81
Neutral
CCI (20)
18.39
Neutral
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
123.5
S2
126.3
S1
128.8
Pivot
131.6
R1
134.0
R2
136.9
R3
139.3
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in CBRE among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
CBRE stock splits
CBRE has split its stock once since 2006. The latest was a 3-for-1 split on 2 Jun 2006.