Alexandria Real Estate Equities is a real estate investment trust that owns and develops laboratory and office campuses for life science, technology and agricultural research tenants. Its properties are clustered in innovation hubs such as Boston, San Francisco and San Diego. The company earns most of its revenue from rent paid under long-term leases, along with reimbursement of operating costs, and it sometimes sells assets to fund new development.
The X-Ray Score for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. is 62 out of 100. Revenue over the last twelve months was $2.8 billion, and it grew 5.3% a year over the past three years. Shareholders receive a dividend, yielding 6.6%. These readings summarise reported results and do not forecast future performance. The figures describe past results only and are drawn from the latest reported period.
52-wk range $39.41 – $78.51Volume 2,805,414Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$7.4B
52-week range$39.41 – $78.51
Volume (last day)2,805,414
P/E (TTM)–
EBIT / EV yield–
Free-cash-flow yield–
Dividend yield6.6%
Revenue (TTM)$2.8B
Net income (TTM)−$1.0B
Operating margin–
Return on capital–
Debt incl. leases$13.2B
Cash & securities$470M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$62middle half of models $40 – $84
Undervalued+43.0% to fair value
Average of the 4 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $43
Undervalued < $53Fair $53 – $75Overvalued > $75
P/B multiple
$85
P/S multiple
$84
P/FFO multiple
$40
P/AFFO multiple
$39
Dividend discount, stable · not used
$112
Dividend discount, multi-stage · not used
$127
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business at a low price
Our models put fair value above today's price, but models can be wrong, so check the business first. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Real Estate peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationStrong
91/100
Cheap against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
Fair value vs price1.4×
GrowthWeak
18/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)5.3%
Growth consistency40%
ProfitabilityStrong
95/100
Earns high returns on the capital it uses.
See the numbers →
Financial healthWeak
28/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score5 / 9
DividendsFair
68/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield6.6%
Dividend growth6.4%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
-1.4%Mar '25
-0.6%Jun '25
-5.0%Sep '25
-4.4%Dec '25
-11.5%Mar '26
-13.0%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $663M, diluted EPS $-0.43.
SWOT analysis: Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Strengthsinside the company
No standout strength in the figures we track.
Weaknessesinside the company
No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
The price is 43% below our fair value estimate, with the gap larger than the margin we allow for error.
Threatsvaluation and setting
Revenue growth slowed to -2.9% last year from 5.3% a year over three years.
Our Market Compass rates the backdrop for Real Estate as unfavourable.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare ARE with peers and sector
Medians of 28 Real Estate peers and of 28 Real Estate stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): WELL48, PLD43, EQIX51, AMT53, SPG42, DLR37.
Metric
ARE
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
62
51
51
Valuation
91
52
52
Growth
18
56
56
Profitability
95
50
50
Financial health
28
56
56
Dividends
68
47
47
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Real Estate
ARE ranks #2 of 29 in Real Estate by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for ARE
Each factor is rated by where ARE stands among the 29 Real Estate stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 3 Good · 2 Average · 4 Bad of 9Growth: 0 · 1 · 1Profitability: 0 · 0 · 2Financial strength: 0 · 0 · 1Valuation: 2 · 0 · 0Cash flow: 1 · 1 · 0
Factor
ARE
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+5.3%
Averagebeats 36%
+6.8%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
−2.9%
Badbeats 9%
+5.1%
+11.5%
▼ Worse
Profitability
Net margin
-36.1%
Badbeats 2%
21.5%
10.4%
▼ Worse
Return on equity
-6.6%
Badbeats 2%
7.3%
1.8%
▼ Worse
Financial strength
Piotroski F-score
5 / 9
Badbeats 28%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
Price / book
0.5x
Goodbeats 98%
2.6x
1.2x
▲ Better
Price / sales
2.6x
Goodbeats 91%
7.0x
7.5x
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
45.0%
Averagebeats 53%
44.6%
48.3%
≈ In line
Accruals (lower is better)
−6.7%
Goodbeats 95%
−3.7%
–
–
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 2 Good · ● 1 Average · ● 2 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Risk models
Piotroski F-ScoreBad
Growth
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyBad
Balance sheet
Valuation
Fair value vs priceGood
Profitability
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 63/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$2.1B
$2.6B
$2.9B
$3.1B
$3.0B
Operating income
–
–
–
–
–
Net income
$571M
$522M
$104M
$323M
−$1.4B
Operating cash flow
$1.0B
$1.3B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.4B
Operating margin
–
–
–
–
–
Free cash flow
–
–
–
–
–
Diluted EPS
$3.82
$3.18
$0.54
$1.80
$-8.44
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bearish
2 bullish · 4 neutral · 10 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bearish
0 bullish · 1 neutral · 11 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bearish
0 bullish · 1 neutral · 7 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
42.78
Bullish
EMA 10
43.13
Bullish
SMA 20
44.86
Bearish
EMA 20
44.73
Bearish
SMA 50
48.49
Bearish
EMA 50
47.16
Bearish
SMA 100
49.22
Bearish
EMA 100
48.23
Bearish
SMA 200
48.63
Bearish
EMA 200
50.77
Bearish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
40.68
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-2.03
Bearish
Momentum (12)
-5.64
Bearish
Stochastic %K (14)
41.86
Neutral
Williams %R (14)
-58.14
Neutral
CCI (20)
-61.84
Neutral
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
39.66
S2
40.62
S1
41.98
Pivot
42.94
R1
44.30
R2
45.26
R3
46.62
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
2.88 USD
Yield on today's price
6.65%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
0.7200
0.7200
0.7200
0.7200
1.3200
1.3200
1.3200
1.3200
1.3000
1.3000
1.2700
1.2700
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in ARE among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.