See inside every stock. Pro
S&P 5007,663▼ 1.21%Nasdaq26,009▼ 2.60%Dow Jones52,868▲ 0.02%Nasdaq 10028,959▼ 2.90%VIX19.03▲ 14.09%US Dollar101.62▼ 0.16%Gold spot4,093▼ 0.80%WTI102.28▲ 2.82%

Top 10 UK stocks, ranked by price-based X-Ray score

368 operating companies with their own listing on the London Stock Exchange pass our liquidity and data checks and are ranked on a price-based score. It does not look at earnings or valuation. The ranking follows fixed rules and is not a recommendation. Data as of 22 Oct 2026.

Companies ranked368
Median score65
ExchangeLSE
Updated22 Oct 2026
#1 Top of this list by our rules, not a recommendation

SHEL Shell plc

London Stock Exchange · price-based Market X-Ray · confidence High
  • Highest liquidity score on the list
Open the full SHEL report →
84Market X-Ray score
out of 100
Trend88
Momentum82
Low risk78
Trading volume100
Income67

Ranks 2 to 10

  1. 2 DCCDCC plc 84
    Trend
    87
    Momentum
    77
    Low risk
    83
    Volume
    99
    1Y +37% ›
  2. 3 SEPLSeplat Petroleum Development Company PLC 83
    Trend
    89
    Momentum
    97
    Low risk
    59
    Volume
    97
    1Y +201% Top 3 momentum ›
  3. 4 SDLFStandard Life PLC 83
    Trend
    85
    Momentum
    78
    Low risk
    85
    Volume
    98
    1Y +46% ›
  4. 5 UUUnited Utilities Group PLC 83
    Trend
    82
    Momentum
    75
    Low risk
    86
    Volume
    98
    1Y +29% ›
  5. 6 HFDHalfords Group PLC 83
    Trend
    88
    Momentum
    89
    Low risk
    67
    Volume
    94
    1Y +79% ›
  6. 7 LRELancashire Holdings Ltd 83
    Trend
    82
    Momentum
    76
    Low risk
    87
    Volume
    94
    1Y +28% ›
  7. 8 ZIGZIGUP plc 82
    Trend
    78
    Momentum
    76
    Low risk
    85
    Volume
    93
    1Y +47% ›
  8. 9 BMEB&M European Value Retail plc 82
    Trend
    92
    Momentum
    91
    Low risk
    56
    Volume
    97
    1Y +61% ›
  9. 10 LGENLegal & General Group PLC 82
    Trend
    80
    Momentum
    74
    Low risk
    87
    Volume
    100
    1Y +34% Top liquidity ›

How this list is ranked

  • Universe. Operating companies with their own listing on the London Stock Exchange that trade at least $1 million a day and have at least a year of price history; foreign companies' shares quoted through London's international order book and closed-end investment companies are left out.
  • Score. Market X-Ray score (0 to 100): trend 25%, momentum 25%, risk 25%, trading volume 15%, income 10% (income counts only for companies that pay dividends). Each lens is a percentile rank against every share on the exchange. There are no earnings, valuation or balance-sheet inputs.
  • Order. Sorted by the Market X-Ray score; ties go to the more heavily traded share.
  • Data. Prices, volumes and dividend payments come from exchange data; every figure is our own calculation, dated 22 Oct 2026. Traded value is converted to US dollars.
  • Limits. Scores describe how prices have behaved, not whether a company is well run or fairly priced. Different weights give a different order, which is why the rules are printed here.

Why a ranking by stated rules and not a "best" label: the order changes with the rules, so the rules are published next to the list. See also how the X-Ray Score works.

What this UK list measures, and what it cannot

The ranking uses only what can be read from a share price and from trading volumes: how firmly the price is trending, how much it has moved over three, six and twelve months, how calm it has been (volatility and the deepest fall of the past year) and how easily the shares trade. A fifth lens, income, counts only for companies that pay dividends. The scores are percentile ranks against every share on the London exchange, so a trend score of 85 means the price is behaving better than roughly 85% of London shares.

What the list cannot do is look inside the company. We hold no company accounts for UK-listed businesses, so profits, debt and valuation play no part, and a share can climb this table because its price is rising for reasons the accounts would not support. For the same reason the page says "price-based" in its title: it answers "which UK shares have been behaving well and are easy to trade", not "which UK shares are cheap".

Why more than half of the liquid London lines are not here

London is not only the UK stock market. Of the 988 lines on the exchange that trade at least $1 million a day, 542 are shares of foreign companies bought through London's international order book (their tickers begin with a zero): a Swiss, Nordic or German company can be traded in London, but its home market sets the price and the rules, so those belong on the page for that country. Another 78 are investment trusts and other closed-end funds. A trust moves with the value of the portfolio it holds and with the discount or premium on its own shares, not like an operating business, so ranking Scottish Mortgage next to Shell would compare different things.

That leaves 368 operating companies with their own London listing; some of them earn most of their money abroad. Funds are recognised by name and by a reviewed list, so a fund with an unusual name can still slip through; tell us if you spot one.

Pence, tiers and thin trading

London prices are quoted in pence, so a share at 1,200p costs £12. This list compares returns and traded value rather than price levels, and each company's daily traded value is converted from pence to US dollars before the $1 million cut-off is applied. The cut-off matters more in London than in most markets because the exchange lists thousands of small companies, including those on AIM, the junior market, whose shares can go days without a trade. A stock that rarely trades can show a very calm price simply because nobody is buying or selling, which is why liquidity is a filter first and a score second.

What the current top ten shows

The leader is Shell plc, and its strongest lens is trading volume. The top three are Shell plc, DCC plc, Seplat Petroleum Development Company PLC. All three sit near the top of the liquidity lens, which is where the biggest London names score close to 100 and which lifts them above smaller companies with similar price behaviour.

The ten stocks returned a median 46% over the last twelve months, against 12% for all 368 eligible companies. That gap shows how much of this score is momentum: a list built on price behaviour has usually already risen, which is information about the past and not a forecast.

How to use it

Use the table to find shares worth a closer look, then open the stock page and read the company's own annual report and its latest trading update. A price-only ranking is most useful for removing shares that are hard to trade or stuck in a downtrend, and least useful for deciding whether a price is fair. For income, the UK dividend list ranks the same companies on a different rule.

Questions about these UK stocks

Does this list include only FTSE 100 companies?

No. It covers every London operating company that has at least a year of price history and trades $1 million or more a day, whatever its index. We do not store FTSE index membership, so this page cannot filter by FTSE 100 or FTSE 250.

Why are investment trusts such as Scottish Mortgage not ranked?

Trusts are closed-end funds. Their share price follows the value of what they hold and a discount or premium to it, so they behave differently from an operating company and would crowd a list of companies. They are excluded by name and by a reviewed list.

Why is a company I know missing from the ranking?

It needs at least a year of price history, daily trading of $1 million or more and a London listing of its own. Recent listings, thinly traded AIM shares and foreign companies quoted through London's international order book fall out.

Is a high rank on this list a reason to buy?

No. The ranking measures how a price has behaved and how easily it trades; it says nothing about profits, debt or valuation, and past price behaviour does not predict future returns.

More Top lists

Educational ranking by stated rules, not investment advice. Figures are StocksXray calculations from public filings and exchange data; they can be wrong or out of date. Past performance does not predict future results.