Everpure, Inc. (P)
Information Technology · Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals · US stock · S&P 500 component
$121.20
▼ -9.73 (7.43%)
Fair valueOvervalued
$96 −20.6% to fair value
$48fair band $82–$117$144
Day's range
$120.27 – $127.23
52-week range
$56.78 – $157.57
About Everpure, Inc.
Everpure is a technology hardware company in the data storage industry. It provides storage systems and related software and services that help businesses and cloud operators keep, manage and protect large amounts of data. Customers are enterprises, service providers and other organisations running data-intensive applications such as analytics and artificial intelligence.
The company earns money from supplying storage systems and related services. Revenue is $4.3 billion over the last twelve months, and revenue growth over three years is 10.0% a year. The operating margin is 5.3%, and the business earns a profit of 15% on the capital invested in it. Everpure does not pay a dividend, and the data sheet carries no net debt figure for it. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 40 out of 100.
Price chart
52-wk range $56.78 – $157.57Volume 2,500,901Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$41.9B
52-week range$56.78 – $157.57
Volume (last day)2,500,901
P/E (TTM)164.8
EBIT / EV yield0.5%
Free-cash-flow yield0.3%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$4.3B
Net income (TTM)$253M
Operating margin5.3%
Return on capital14.6%
Debt incl. leasesData missing
Cash & securities$386M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$96middle half of models $88 – $109
Overvalued
−20.6% to fair value
Average of the 10 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $121
Undervalued < $82Fair $82 – $117Overvalued > $117
P/E multiple
$120
P/B multiple
$80
P/S multiple
$76
EV/EBITDA multiple
$93
EV/EBIT multiple
$106
EV/revenue multiple
$88
10-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$88
5-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$112
10-year DCF, revenue exit
$90
5-year DCF, revenue exit
$110
10-year DCF, growth exit · not used
$5
5-year DCF, growth exit · not used
$6
Earnings power value · not used
$7
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, priced high
Our models put fair value below today's price, so a lot of good news may already be in the price. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Information Technology peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
Valuation
Weak
9/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield0.5%
Free-cash-flow yield0.3%
Fair value vs price0.8×
Growth
Fair
59/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)10.0%
EPS growth (3y)33.7%
Growth consistency100%
Profitability
Weak
46/100
Earns lower returns on its capital than most peers.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital14.6%
Operating margin5.3%
Gross profitability56.9%
Financial health
Fair
51/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score6 / 9
Interest coverNo interest cost
Dividends
None
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+12.3%
May '25
+12.7%
Aug '25
+16.0%
Nov '25
+20.4%
Feb '26
+35.2%
May '26
+37.7%
Aug '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $1.2B, diluted EPS $0.21.
Compare with peers
SNDK Sandisk Corp73 SMCI Super Micro Computer,...58 STX Seagate Technology Hol...56 NTAP NetApp, Inc.54Other Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Everpure, Inc.
Strengthsinside the company
- Earnings per share have compounded at 33.7% a year over three years.
- Operating profit covers interest 214x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Weaknessesinside the company
- Return on invested capital of 14.6% is well below the 57.7% median of industry peers.
- Operating margin of 5.3% is thin against 25.0% for industry peers.
- Altman Z-score of 1.5 is in the zone linked with financial distress in past studies.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
- Revenue growth picked up to 15.6% last year from 10.0% a year over three years.
- Our Market Compass rates the backdrop for Information Technology as favourable.
- Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
- Trades at 165.4x earnings, 537% above the 26.0x median of industry peers, so the price already assumes better results.
- The price is 21% above our fair value estimate, so there is little room for disappointment.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare P with peers and sector
Medians of 9 Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals peers and of 74 Information Technology stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): AAPL 53, DELL 53, SNDK 73, STX 56, WDC 52, HPE 45.
| Metric | P | Peers | Sector |
|---|---|---|---|
| X-Ray Score (out of 100) | 40 | 53 | 50 |
| Valuation | 9 | 59 | 52 |
| Growth | 59 | 73 | 54 |
| Profitability | 46 | 58 | 50 |
| Financial health | 51 | 61 | 49 |
| Dividends | – | 46 | 50 |
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Information Technology
P ranks #61 of 75 in Information Technology and #10 of 10 in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for P
Each factor is rated by where P stands among the 75 Information Technology stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 5 Good · 7 Average · 10 Bad of 22
Growth: 1 · 2 · 0
Profitability: 1 · 2 · 2
Financial strength: 1 · 2 · 0
Valuation: 0 · 0 · 5
Cash flow: 1 · 1 · 2
Efficiency: 1 · 0 · 1
| Factor | P | Rating | Sector median | Own 5-year median | Against own history |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth | |||||
| Revenue growth, 3 years a year | +10.0% | Average beats 53% | +9.7% | – | – |
| Revenue growth, last year | +15.6% | Average beats 58% | +13.7% | +15.6% | ≈ In line |
| EPS growth, 3 years a year | +33.7% | Good beats 87% | +5.9% | – | – |
| Profitability | |||||
| Gross margin | 69.7% | Good beats 68% | 57.8% | 69.8% | ≈ In line |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | Bad beats 9% | 20.3% | 2.7% | ▲ Better |
| Net margin | 5.9% | Bad beats 17% | 17.8% | 2.7% | ▲ Better |
| Return on invested capital | 14.6% | Average beats 38% | 19.4% | – | – |
| Return on equity | 16.4% | Average beats 39% | 21.0% | 7.8% | ▲ Better |
| Financial strength | |||||
| Interest cover | 213.9x | Good beats 97% | 23.0x | 10.9x | ▲ Better |
| Current ratio | 1.51 | Average beats 47% | 1.57 | 1.61 | ≈ In line |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 / 9 | Average beats 43% | 6 / 9 | – | – |
| Valuation | |||||
| P/E ratio | 165.4x | Bad beats 8% | 33.6x | 178.2x | ≈ In line |
| Price / book | 27.2x | Bad beats 14% | 8.3x | 11.1x | ▼ Worse |
| Price / sales | 9.8x | Bad beats 33% | 6.9x | 5.0x | ▼ Worse |
| EV / EBITDA | 110.4x | Bad beats 8% | 24.7x | 86.2x | ▼ Worse |
| Free cash flow yield | 0.3% | Bad beats 5% | 3.4% | 3.4% | ▼ Worse |
| Cash flow | |||||
| Free cash flow margin | 3.0% | Bad beats 6% | 22.3% | 16.8% | ▼ Worse |
| Cash from operations / net income | 1.69 | Good beats 67% | 1.39 | 8.78 | ▼ Worse |
| Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year | +0.4% | Bad beats 19% | +15.4% | – | – |
| Accruals (lower is better) | −3.3% | Average beats 41% | −4.4% | – | – |
| Efficiency | |||||
| Inventory turnover | 12.1x | Good beats 87% | 3.9x | 18.2x | ▼ Worse |
| Days sales outstanding | 88 days | Bad beats 15% | 63 days | 85 days | ≈ In line |
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 4 Good · ● 5 Average · ● 6 BadCash quality
Earnings backed by cashAverage
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Good
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Bad
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioAverage
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginBad
Gross profitabilityGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 42/100.
Financials
| FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.8B | $2.8B | $3.2B | $3.7B |
| Operating income | −$98M | $84M | $54M | $85M | $115M |
| Net income | −$143M | $73M | $61M | $107M | $188M |
| Operating cash flow | $410M | $767M | $678M | $754M | $880M |
| Operating margin | -4.5% | 3.0% | 1.9% | 2.7% | 3.1% |
| Free cash flow | $308M | $609M | $483M | $527M | $616M |
| Diluted EPS | $-0.50 | $0.23 | $0.19 | $0.31 | $0.55 |
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
9 bullish · 2 neutral · 5 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
| SMA 10 | 137.1 | Bearish |
| EMA 10 | 132.2 | Bearish |
| SMA 20 | 137.8 | Bearish |
| EMA 20 | 131.5 | Bearish |
| SMA 50 | 117.6 | Bullish |
| EMA 50 | 119.0 | Bullish |
| SMA 100 | 97.43 | Bullish |
| EMA 100 | 104.9 | Bullish |
| SMA 200 | 83.67 | Bullish |
| EMA 200 | 91.66 | Bullish |
Oscillators (daily)
| RSI (14) | 44.00 | Neutral |
| MACD (12, 26) | 3.63 | Bullish |
| Momentum (12) | -17.66 | Bearish |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 2.49 | Bullish |
| Williams %R (14) | -97.51 | Bullish |
| CCI (20) | -99.29 | Neutral |
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3 111.6 | S2 115.9 | S1 118.6 | Pivot 122.9 | R1 125.5 | R2 129.9 | R3 132.5 |
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
ETFs that hold P
| ETF | Share of the fund |
|---|---|
| SKYY First Trust Cloud Computing | 3.89% |
| XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality | 3.28% |
| MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth | 1.32% |
| IJK iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth | 1.32% |
| VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth | 0.70% |
| SPMD SPDR Russell Small Cap Completeness | 0.68% |
| IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap | 0.68% |
| IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth | 0.58% |
The eight funds with the largest weight in P among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
P SEC filings
10-QSEC EDGAR
Quarterly report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations
8-KSEC EDGAR
Shareholder vote results
10-QSEC EDGAR
Quarterly report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations
DEF 14ASEC EDGAR
Proxy statement
10-KSEC EDGAR
Annual report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations
Where the numbers come from
Statements SEC EDGAR filings (10-K, 10-Q), quarters derived from year-to-date figures.
Prices end-of-day closes, split-adjusted.
Industry inputs beta, multiples and equity risk premium from Damodaran Online (NYU Stern).
StocksXray is for education only and is not financial advice. Scores and fair values are model estimates from public filings and carry uncertainty.