W.W. Grainger distributes maintenance, repair and operating supplies, such as safety gear, tools, lighting, cleaning supplies and electrical items, to businesses and institutions. It sells through a high-touch model that supports large customers and through an online platform serving smaller ones. The company earns money from the margin between the prices it pays suppliers and what it charges customers, plus inventory management services.
Over the latest twelve months the company reported revenue of $18.8 billion, and annual revenue rose by 5.6% on average across three years. Profitability at the operating level stands at 14.6%, and return on invested capital came to 34%. The company carries net debt of 0.6 times its EBITDA. A dividend is paid, with a yield of 0.7%. It carries an X-Ray Score of 55 out of 100.
52-wk range $906.52 – $1,419.91Volume 224,741Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$64.2B
52-week range$906.52 – $1,419.91
Volume (last day)224,741
P/E (TTM)34.6
EBIT / EV yield4.1%
Free-cash-flow yield2.4%
Dividend yield0.7%
Revenue (TTM)$18.8B
Net income (TTM)$1.9B
Operating margin14.6%
Return on capital34.0%
Debt incl. leases$2.4B
Cash & securities$589M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$1,151middle half of models $1,032 – $1,284
Fair−15.3% to fair value
Average of the 14 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Strong business at a fair price
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Industrials peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
22/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield4.1%
Free-cash-flow yield2.4%
Fair value vs price0.8×
GrowthFair
51/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)5.6%
EPS growth (3y)5.6%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityStrong
70/100
Earns high returns on the capital it uses.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital34.0%
Operating margin14.6%
Gross profitability77.2%
Financial healthStrong
82/100
Balance sheet looks strong: debt is well covered.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score7 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA0.6×
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsFair
51/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield0.7%
Dividends vs free cash flow30%
Dividend growth8.1%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+1.7%Mar '25
+5.6%Jun '25
+6.1%Sep '25
+4.5%Dec '25
+10.1%Mar '26
+10.3%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $5.0B, diluted EPS $12.01.
Other Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Strengthsinside the company
Return on invested capital is 34.0%, against a median of 13.1% for industry peers.
Operating profit covers interest 50x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Passes 7 of the 9 Piotroski tests, which points to improving profitability, funding and efficiency.
Weaknessesinside the company
No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
Trades at 34.3x earnings, 35% above the 25.4x median of industry peers, so the price already assumes better results.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare GWW with peers and sector
Medians of 13 Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components peers and of 80 Industrials stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): PH50, ITW46, IR47, OTIS55, DOV49, XYL55.
Metric
GWW
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
55
49
50
Valuation
22
57
48
Growth
51
37
50
Profitability
70
48
50
Financial health
82
47
49
Dividends
51
55
53
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Industrials
GWW ranks #29 of 81 in Industrials and #5 of 14 in Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for GWW
Each factor is rated by where GWW stands among the 81 Industrials stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 7 Good · 9 Average · 7 Bad of 23Growth: 0 · 3 · 0Profitability: 2 · 3 · 0Financial strength: 4 · 0 · 0Valuation: 0 · 1 · 4Cash flow: 0 · 1 · 3Efficiency: 1 · 1 · 0
Factor
GWW
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+5.6%
Averagebeats 49%
+5.6%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+4.5%
Averagebeats 51%
+4.5%
+8.2%
▼ Worse
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+5.6%
Averagebeats 49%
+5.7%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
39.4%
Averagebeats 58%
38.0%
39.1%
≈ In line
Operating margin
14.6%
Averagebeats 41%
17.5%
14.5%
≈ In line
Net margin
9.9%
Averagebeats 35%
12.8%
10.2%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
34.0%
Goodbeats 88%
14.9%
–
–
Return on equity
45.3%
Goodbeats 88%
23.7%
56.8%
▼ Worse
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
0.6x
Goodbeats 90%
1.8x
0.7x
≈ In line
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 76%
21.4x
30.8x
▲ Better
Current ratio
2.81
Goodbeats 92%
1.25
2.63
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
7 / 9
Goodbeats 68%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
34.3x
Badbeats 28%
28.9x
25.9x
▼ Worse
Price / book
15.5x
Badbeats 15%
6.2x
13.3x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
3.4x
Averagebeats 54%
3.5x
2.5x
▼ Worse
EV / EBITDA
21.6x
Badbeats 28%
18.5x
17.0x
▼ Worse
Free cash flow yield
2.4%
Badbeats 13%
3.8%
3.0%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
8.0%
Badbeats 21%
13.8%
7.4%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
1.16
Badbeats 21%
1.39
1.11
≈ In line
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+7.3%
Badbeats 26%
+14.5%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−3.2%
Averagebeats 49%
−3.2%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
4.8x
Goodbeats 68%
4.0x
4.4x
≈ In line
Days sales outstanding
55 days
Averagebeats 56%
57 days
49 days
▼ Worse
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 8 Good · ● 5 Average · ● 3 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashAverage
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Good
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Bad
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Net debt / EBITDAGood
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginAverage
Gross profitabilityGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 57/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$13.0B
$15.2B
$16.5B
$17.2B
$17.9B
Operating income
$1.5B
$2.2B
$2.6B
$2.6B
$2.5B
Net income
$1.0B
$1.5B
$1.8B
$1.9B
$1.7B
Operating cash flow
$937M
$1.3B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.0B
Operating margin
11.9%
14.5%
15.6%
15.4%
13.9%
Free cash flow
$682M
$1.1B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.3B
Diluted EPS
$19.84
$30.06
$36.23
$38.71
$35.40
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Strongly bullish
12 bullish · 1 neutral · 3 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
10 bullish · 1 neutral · 1 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
1,328.0
Bullish
EMA 10
1,328.1
Bullish
SMA 20
1,296.5
Bullish
EMA 20
1,311.0
Bullish
SMA 50
1,296.1
Bullish
EMA 50
1,301.5
Bullish
SMA 100
1,317.4
Bullish
EMA 100
1,285.0
Bullish
SMA 200
1,224.0
Bullish
EMA 200
1,229.8
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
68.21
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
16.95
Bullish
Momentum (12)
6.63
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
99.98
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-0.02
Bearish
CCI (20)
108.3
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
1,273.6
S2
1,290.9
S1
1,325.5
Pivot
1,342.8
R1
1,377.4
R2
1,394.7
R3
1,429.3
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
9.50 USD
Yield on today's price
0.70%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
2.4900
2.4900
2.2600
2.2600
2.2600
2.2600
2.0500
2.0500
2.0500
2.0500
1.8600
1.8600
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in GWW among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
GWW stock splits
GWW has split its stock 2 times since 1991. The latest was a 2-for-1 split on 15 Jun 1998.