Vertex Pharmaceuticals is a biotechnology company that discovers, develops and sells medicines for serious diseases. Its commercial business has been built mainly on treatments for cystic fibrosis, and it also runs research programs in areas such as pain, kidney disease and genetic blood disorders. Revenue comes from sales of approved medicines to patients through health systems and insurers, and the company funds a large pipeline of clinical research from those sales.
Over the last twelve months, $12.6 billion in revenue was reported. The three-year revenue growth rate is 10.4% a year. Profitability shows an operating margin of 38.0% and a return on invested capital of 32%. No dividend is paid. This gives an X-Ray Score of 50 out of 100. These figures describe past results as reported and are a factual snapshot, not a forecast. Some measures, such as margins for real estate trusts and banks, are defined differently from those of industrial firms, so comparisons should be made with care.
52-wk range $403.16 – $560.25Volume 1,641,340Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$136.6B
52-week range$403.16 – $560.25
Volume (last day)1,641,340
P/E (TTM)31.2
EBIT / EV yield3.7%
Free-cash-flow yield2.8%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$12.6B
Net income (TTM)$4.4B
Operating margin38.0%
Return on capital32.2%
Debt incl. leasesData missing
Cash & securities$7.9B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$451middle half of models $462 – $522
Fair−15.7% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Health Care peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
25/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield3.7%
Free-cash-flow yield2.8%
Fair value vs price0.8×
GrowthFair
56/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)10.4%
EPS growth (3y)6.1%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityFair
56/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital32.2%
Operating margin38.0%
Gross profitability39.5%
Financial healthFair
68/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score6 / 9
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+3.0%Mar '25
+12.1%Jun '25
+11.0%Sep '25
+9.5%Dec '25
+7.8%Mar '26
+12.5%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $3.3B, diluted EPS $4.31.
Return on invested capital is 32.2%, against a median of 12.5% for industry peers.
Operating margin of 38.0% is well above the 24.7% median of industry peers, a sign of pricing power or lower costs.
Revenue has grown 10.4% a year over three years (median 2.6% for industry peers).
Operating profit covers interest 50x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Weaknessesinside the company
No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
No specific threat is flagged by our checks; general market and interest-rate risk still applies.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare VRTX with peers and sector
Medians of 7 Biotechnology peers and of 59 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): ABBV41, AMGN48, GILD37, REGN47, MRNA12, BIIB44.
Metric
VRTX
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
50
44
49
Valuation
25
36
55
Growth
56
35
47
Profitability
56
39
49
Financial health
68
38
48
Dividends
–
51
51
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Health Care
VRTX ranks #29 of 60 in Health Care and #2 of 8 in Biotechnology by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for VRTX
Each factor is rated by where VRTX stands among the 60 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 9 Good · 5 Average · 8 Bad of 22Growth: 1 · 2 · 0Profitability: 5 · 0 · 0Financial strength: 2 · 1 · 0Valuation: 0 · 1 · 4Cash flow: 1 · 0 · 3Efficiency: 0 · 1 · 1
Factor
VRTX
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+10.4%
Goodbeats 73%
+5.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+8.9%
Averagebeats 63%
+7.1%
+11.7%
▼ Worse
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+6.1%
Averagebeats 55%
+5.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
86.0%
Goodbeats 93%
65.0%
87.2%
≈ In line
Operating margin
38.0%
Goodbeats 98%
16.4%
36.7%
≈ In line
Net margin
35.0%
Goodbeats 99%
11.1%
32.9%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
32.2%
Goodbeats 86%
12.2%
–
–
Return on equity
21.8%
Goodbeats 71%
13.7%
21.2%
≈ In line
Financial strength
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 82%
9.4x
50.0x
≈ In line
Current ratio
3.19
Goodbeats 89%
1.52
3.99
▼ Worse
Piotroski F-score
6 / 9
Averagebeats 43%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
31.0x
Averagebeats 44%
28.2x
26.8x
▼ Worse
Price / book
6.7x
Badbeats 32%
3.7x
6.0x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
10.9x
Badbeats 8%
3.7x
9.4x
▼ Worse
EV / EBITDA
25.7x
Badbeats 31%
17.6x
–
–
Free cash flow yield
2.8%
Badbeats 22%
4.4%
3.1%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
30.2%
Goodbeats 94%
16.3%
31.8%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
0.97
Badbeats 3%
1.61
1.05
≈ In line
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
−6.6%
Badbeats 21%
+4.3%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
+0.4%
Badbeats 3%
−3.9%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
1.0x
Badbeats 3%
2.9x
1.7x
▼ Worse
Days sales outstanding
62 days
Averagebeats 51%
62 days
58 days
≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 8 Good · ● 3 Average · ● 4 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Good
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Bad
Revenue growth (3y)Good
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginGood
Gross profitabilityGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 56/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$7.6B
$8.9B
$9.9B
$11.0B
$12.0B
Operating income
$2.8B
$4.3B
$3.8B
−$233M
$4.2B
Net income
$2.3B
$3.3B
$3.6B
−$536M
$4.0B
Operating cash flow
$2.6B
$4.1B
$3.5B
−$493M
$3.6B
Operating margin
36.7%
48.2%
38.8%
-2.1%
34.8%
Free cash flow
$2.4B
$3.9B
$3.3B
−$790M
$3.2B
Diluted EPS
$9.01
$12.82
$13.89
$-2.08
$15.32
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
11 bullish · 1 neutral · 4 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
508.6
Bullish
EMA 10
513.7
Bullish
SMA 20
510.8
Bullish
EMA 20
512.5
Bullish
SMA 50
522.6
Bullish
EMA 50
511.8
Bullish
SMA 100
500.3
Bullish
EMA 100
500.8
Bullish
SMA 200
477.2
Bullish
EMA 200
483.4
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
61.53
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-0.15
Bearish
Momentum (12)
6.54
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
95.23
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-4.77
Bearish
CCI (20)
152.5
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
508.6
S2
515.0
S1
525.1
Pivot
531.4
R1
541.5
R2
547.8
R3
557.9
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in VRTX among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
VRTX stock splits
VRTX has split its stock once since 2000. The latest was a 2-for-1 split on 24 Aug 2000.