As a specialty retailer, O'Reilly Automotive supplies replacement parts, tools, accessories and maintenance items for cars and light trucks across the United States. Its customers are do-it-yourself vehicle owners and professional repair shops, and it serves both from a network of stores supported by regional distribution centres. A dedicated sales team calls on professional customers, while shoppers can also order through the company's website.
Revenue comes from parts and accessory sales through the stores, to both everyday drivers and repair businesses. Over the last twelve months it reached $18.6 billion, and it has grown at 7.3% a year across the last three years. The operating margin is 19.6%, and the business earns a profit of 58% on the capital invested in it. It carries net debt of 1.6 times EBITDA and does not pay a dividend. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 46 out of 100.
52-wk range $82.59 – $102.46Volume 4,988,491Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$76.3B
52-week range$82.59 – $102.46
Volume (last day)4,988,491
P/E (TTM)29.3
EBIT / EV yield4.4%
Free-cash-flow yield2.8%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$18.6B
Net income (TTM)$2.7B
Operating margin19.6%
Return on capital57.6%
Debt incl. leases$7.0B
Cash & securities$262M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$88middle half of models $87 – $96
Fair−4.2% to fair value
Average of the 12 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Low, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $92
Undervalued < $75Fair $75 – $107Overvalued > $107
P/E multiple
$92
P/S multiple
$92
EV/EBITDA multiple
$91
EV/EBIT multiple
$94
EV/revenue multiple
$93
10-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$96
5-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$99
10-year DCF, revenue exit
$96
5-year DCF, revenue exit
$99
10-year DCF, growth exit
$65
5-year DCF, growth exit
$63
Earnings power value
$78
Growth the price implies
13.2%/yr
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Consumer Discretionary peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
27/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield4.4%
Free-cash-flow yield2.8%
Fair value vs price1.0×
GrowthWeak
42/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)7.3%
EPS growth (3y)-55.4%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityFair
67/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital57.6%
Operating margin19.6%
Gross profitability55.1%
Financial healthWeak
46/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score7 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.6×
Interest cover14.4×
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+4.0%Mar '25
+5.9%Jun '25
+7.8%Sep '25
+7.8%Dec '25
+10.2%Mar '26
+8.1%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $4.9B, diluted EPS $0.86.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare ORLY with peers and sector
Medians of 46 Consumer Discretionary peers and of 46 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): AMZN42, TSLA28, HD40, MCD53, TJX55, BKNG70.
Metric
ORLY
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
46
51
51
Valuation
27
49
49
Growth
42
53
53
Profitability
67
52
52
Financial health
46
50
50
Dividends
–
52
52
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Consumer Discretionary
ORLY ranks #32 of 47 in Consumer Discretionary by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for ORLY
Each factor is rated by where ORLY stands among the 47 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 4 Good · 7 Average · 10 Bad of 21Growth: 0 · 2 · 1Profitability: 3 · 1 · 0Financial strength: 1 · 2 · 1Valuation: 0 · 0 · 4Cash flow: 0 · 1 · 3Efficiency: 0 · 1 · 1
Factor
ORLY
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+7.3%
Averagebeats 57%
+6.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+6.4%
Averagebeats 58%
+4.9%
+8.1%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
−55.4%
Badbeats 4%
+4.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
51.6%
Averagebeats 66%
42.5%
51.3%
≈ In line
Operating margin
19.6%
Goodbeats 72%
14.9%
20.2%
≈ In line
Net margin
14.3%
Goodbeats 77%
11.4%
14.8%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
57.6%
Goodbeats 82%
24.6%
–
–
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
1.6x
Averagebeats 51%
1.8x
1.5x
≈ In line
Interest cover
14.4x
Averagebeats 42%
25.3x
15.8x
≈ In line
Current ratio
0.75
Badbeats 22%
1.10
0.73
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
7 / 9
Goodbeats 76%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
28.8x
Badbeats 23%
21.1x
29.2x
≈ In line
Price / sales
4.1x
Badbeats 20%
2.1x
4.2x
≈ In line
EV / EBITDA
19.9x
Badbeats 23%
15.0x
20.2x
≈ In line
Free cash flow yield
2.8%
Badbeats 19%
4.3%
2.9%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
11.6%
Averagebeats 58%
10.8%
12.8%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
1.24
Badbeats 28%
1.37
1.29
≈ In line
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
−14.9%
Badbeats 13%
+12.1%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−3.7%
Badbeats 26%
−5.3%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
1.5x
Badbeats 2%
4.2x
1.6x
≈ In line
Days sales outstanding
9 days
Averagebeats 61%
14 days
8 days
≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 4 Good · ● 4 Average · ● 8 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Bad
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Bad
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverAverage
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginGood
Gross profitabilityAverage
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 42/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$13.3B
$14.4B
$15.8B
$16.7B
$17.8B
Operating income
$2.9B
$3.0B
$3.2B
$3.3B
$3.5B
Net income
$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.4B
$2.5B
Operating cash flow
$3.2B
$3.1B
$3.0B
$3.0B
$2.8B
Operating margin
21.9%
20.5%
20.2%
19.5%
19.5%
Free cash flow
$2.8B
$2.6B
$2.0B
$2.0B
$1.6B
Diluted EPS
$31.10
$33.44
$2.56
$2.71
$2.97
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Strongly bullish
12 bullish · 1 neutral · 3 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
9 bullish · 1 neutral · 2 bearish
Monthly
Bullish
5 bullish · 1 neutral · 2 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
88.39
Bullish
EMA 10
88.77
Bullish
SMA 20
86.88
Bullish
EMA 20
87.69
Bullish
SMA 50
87.35
Bullish
EMA 50
87.49
Bullish
SMA 100
88.04
Bullish
EMA 100
88.39
Bullish
SMA 200
90.66
Bullish
EMA 200
89.95
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
68.52
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
0.98
Bullish
Momentum (12)
8.06
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
99.67
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-0.33
Bearish
CCI (20)
169.2
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
87.29
S2
88.25
S1
90.12
Pivot
91.08
R1
92.95
R2
93.91
R3
95.78
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in ORLY among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
ORLY stock splits
ORLY has split its stock 4 times since 1997. The latest was a 15-for-1 split on 10 Jun 2025.