Risk, strategy and people are the themes of the advice Marsh McLennan gives its clients. Its Marsh unit brokers insurance and manages risk for companies, Guy Carpenter arranges reinsurance, Mercer consults on pensions, health benefits and workforce matters, and Oliver Wyman provides management consulting. The business is organised into a risk and insurance services segment and a consulting segment, serving corporations, governments and institutions around the world.
Revenue comes from fees for advice and commissions on insurance placed for clients. Sales were $28.5 billion over the last twelve months, having grown at 9.2% a year over the last three years. The operating margin is 21.4%, and the business earns a profit of 13% on the capital invested in it. Net debt is 3.4 times EBITDA. It pays a dividend with a yield of 1.9%. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 50 out of 100.
52-wk range $156.60 – $199.59Volume 3,065,179Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$95.5B
52-week range$156.60 – $199.59
Volume (last day)3,065,179
P/E (TTM)23.9
EBIT / EV yield5.2%
Free-cash-flow yield4.4%
Dividend yield1.9%
Revenue (TTM)$28.5B
Net income (TTM)$4.0B
Operating margin21.4%
Return on capital12.6%
Debt incl. leases$23.9B
Cash & securities$1.8B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$224middle half of models $206 – $245
Fair+12.5% to fair value
Average of the 14 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Low, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Financials peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
45/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield5.2%
Free-cash-flow yield4.4%
Fair value vs price1.1×
GrowthFair
63/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)9.2%
EPS growth (3y)11.8%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityFair
53/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital12.6%
Operating margin21.4%
Financial healthWeak
35/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score6 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA3.4×
Interest cover6.3×
DividendsFair
59/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield1.9%
Dividends vs free cash flow44%
Dividend growth14.3%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+12.1%Jun '25
+11.5%Sep '25
+8.7%Dec '25
+7.6%Mar '26
+6.2%Jun '26
+8.1%Sep '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $6.9B, diluted EPS $1.69.
Dividends use only 44% of free cash flow, which leaves room to raise them.
Our Market Compass rates the backdrop for Financials as favourable.
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
No specific threat is flagged by our checks; general market and interest-rate risk still applies.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare MRSH with peers and sector
Medians of 4 Insurance Brokers peers and of 70 Financials stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): AJG46, AON48, WTW37, BRO54.
Metric
MRSH
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
50
47
50
Valuation
45
49
52
Growth
63
65
54
Profitability
53
47
48
Financial health
35
28
51
Dividends
59
57
54
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Financials
MRSH ranks #37 of 71 in Financials and #2 of 5 in Insurance Brokers by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for MRSH
Each factor is rated by where MRSH stands among the 71 Financials stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 2 Good · 9 Average · 10 Bad of 21Growth: 1 · 2 · 0Profitability: 1 · 1 · 2Financial strength: 0 · 2 · 2Valuation: 0 · 1 · 4Cash flow: 0 · 3 · 1Efficiency: 0 · 0 · 1
Factor
MRSH
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+9.2%
Averagebeats 53%
+8.3%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+10.3%
Goodbeats 75%
+6.9%
+9.7%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+11.8%
Averagebeats 46%
+12.7%
–
–
Profitability
Operating margin
21.4%
Badbeats 30%
29.1%
23.1%
≈ In line
Net margin
14.2%
Badbeats 30%
21.8%
15.9%
▼ Worse
Return on invested capital
12.6%
Averagebeats 47%
13.5%
–
–
Return on equity
27.1%
Goodbeats 82%
15.7%
28.4%
≈ In line
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
3.4x
Badbeats 19%
1.1x
2.2x
▼ Worse
Interest cover
6.3x
Badbeats 14%
50.0x
9.1x
▼ Worse
Current ratio
1.09
Averagebeats 59%
1.05
1.10
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
6 / 9
Averagebeats 38%
7 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
23.6x
Badbeats 23%
13.8x
25.9x
≈ In line
Price / book
6.4x
Badbeats 12%
2.2x
7.8x
▲ Better
Price / sales
3.4x
Averagebeats 45%
3.1x
4.2x
▲ Better
EV / EBITDA
18.3x
Badbeats 19%
10.8x
19.4x
≈ In line
Free cash flow yield
4.4%
Badbeats 31%
5.8%
3.8%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
14.6%
Badbeats 21%
23.2%
16.3%
▼ Worse
Cash from operations / net income
1.11
Averagebeats 37%
1.25
1.13
≈ In line
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+18.6%
Averagebeats 65%
+12.7%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−0.7%
Averagebeats 45%
−1.0%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
110 days
Badbeats 18%
53 days
103 days
≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 2 Good · ● 8 Average · ● 5 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashAverage
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Average
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioAverage
Net debt / EBITDABad
Interest coverBad
Valuation
Fair value vs priceGood
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 44/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$19.8B
$20.7B
$22.7B
$24.5B
$27.0B
Operating income
$4.3B
$4.3B
$5.3B
$5.8B
$6.2B
Net income
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.8B
$4.1B
$4.2B
Operating cash flow
$3.5B
$3.5B
$4.3B
$4.3B
$5.3B
Operating margin
21.8%
20.7%
23.2%
23.8%
23.1%
Free cash flow
$3.1B
$3.0B
$3.8B
$4.0B
$5.0B
Diluted EPS
$6.13
$6.04
$7.53
$8.18
$8.43
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
12 bullish · 0 neutral · 4 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
6 bullish · 1 neutral · 1 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
185.2
Bullish
EMA 10
186.9
Bullish
SMA 20
178.2
Bullish
EMA 20
182.3
Bullish
SMA 50
180.7
Bullish
EMA 50
179.9
Bullish
SMA 100
177.6
Bullish
EMA 100
178.4
Bullish
SMA 200
174.9
Bullish
EMA 200
179.0
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
80.15
Bearish
MACD (12, 26)
4.29
Bullish
Momentum (12)
16.03
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
99.03
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-0.97
Bearish
CCI (20)
170.8
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
186.3
S2
189.0
S1
194.1
Pivot
196.9
R1
202.0
R2
204.7
R3
209.9
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
3.78 USD
Yield on today's price
1.90%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
0.9900
0.9900
0.9000
0.9000
0.9000
0.9000
0.8150
0.8150
0.8150
0.8150
0.7100
0.7100
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in MRSH among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
MRSH stock splits
MRSH has split its stock 3 times since 1997. The latest was a 2-for-1 split on 1 Jul 2002.