Messenger RNA is the technology behind the medicines and vaccines that Moderna, a biotechnology company, develops. Its marketed products include a vaccine against the coronavirus that causes COVID and a vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus. Its research pipeline covers infectious disease, cancer and rare conditions. Customers are governments, health systems, pharmacies and distributors that purchase its vaccines.
Vaccine supply to governments and healthcare providers is the main source of revenue, together with some collaboration income. Revenue was $2.2 billion over the last twelve months and has changed at -53.4% a year across the last three years, a very steep decline. The operating margin is -149.0%, a large operating loss, and the business earns -91% on the capital invested in it. No dividend is paid. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 12 out of 100.
52-wk range $22.28 – $254.48Volume 49,812,057Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$80.6B
52-week range$22.28 – $254.48
Volume (last day)49,812,057
P/E (TTM)–
EBIT / EV yield-4.3%
Free-cash-flow yield-1.5%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$2.2B
Net income (TTM)−$3.2B
Operating margin-149.0%
Return on capital-91.3%
Debt incl. leases$1.3B
Cash & securities$5.1B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$107middle half of models $97 – $117
Overvalued−47.0% to fair value
Average of the 4 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $203
Undervalued < $91Fair $91 – $130Overvalued > $130
P/B multiple
$113
P/S multiple
$99
EV/revenue multiple
$128
10-year DCF, revenue exit · not used
$43
5-year DCF, revenue exit
$90
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, priced high
Our models put fair value below today's price, so a lot of good news may already be in the price. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Health Care peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
2/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield-4.3%
Free-cash-flow yield-1.5%
Fair value vs price0.5×
GrowthWeak
1/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)-53.4%
Growth consistency30%
ProfitabilityWeak
18/100
Earns lower returns on its capital than most peers.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital-91.3%
Operating margin-149.0%
Gross profitability4.8%
Financial healthWeak
28/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score3 / 9
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
-35.3%Mar '25
-41.1%Jun '25
-45.4%Sep '25
-29.8%Dec '25
+260.2%Mar '26
+2.1%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $145M, diluted EPS $-1.97.
Return on invested capital is only -91.3% (median 17.7% for industry peers), so the business earns little above its cost of capital.
Operating margin of -149.0% is thin against 26.2% for industry peers.
Revenue has fallen 53.4% a year over three years while industry peers grew 5.6%.
Free cash flow is negative, so spending or debt has to be financed from outside.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
The price is 47% above our fair value estimate, so there is little room for disappointment.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare MRNA with peers and sector
Medians of 7 Biotechnology peers and of 59 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): ABBV41, AMGN48, GILD37, VRTX50, REGN47, BIIB44.
Metric
MRNA
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
12
47
49
Valuation
2
36
55
Growth
1
45
48
Profitability
18
55
51
Financial health
28
55
48
Dividends
–
51
51
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Health Care
MRNA ranks #60 of 60 in Health Care and #8 of 8 in Biotechnology by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for MRNA
Each factor is rated by where MRNA stands among the 60 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 4 Good · 0 Average · 12 Bad of 16Growth: 0 · 0 · 2Profitability: 0 · 0 · 5Financial strength: 1 · 0 · 1Valuation: 0 · 0 · 3Cash flow: 1 · 0 · 1Efficiency: 2 · 0 · 0
Factor
MRNA
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
−53.4%
Badbeats 1%
+5.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
−39.9%
Badbeats 1%
+7.1%
−39.9%
≈ In line
Profitability
Gross margin
23.4%
Badbeats 11%
65.0%
55.3%
▼ Worse
Operating margin
-149.0%
Badbeats 1%
16.4%
-61.9%
▼ Worse
Net margin
-141.4%
Badbeats 1%
11.1%
-68.8%
▼ Worse
Return on invested capital
-91.3%
Badbeats 1%
12.2%
–
–
Return on equity
-46.6%
Badbeats 1%
13.7%
-32.6%
▼ Worse
Financial strength
Current ratio
2.29
Goodbeats 79%
1.52
3.29
▼ Worse
Piotroski F-score
3 / 9
Badbeats 2%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
Price / book
11.9x
Badbeats 14%
3.7x
2.7x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
36.2x
Badbeats 1%
3.7x
5.5x
▼ Worse
Free cash flow yield
-1.5%
Badbeats 1%
4.4%
-10.1%
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
-55.8%
Badbeats 1%
16.3%
-55.9%
≈ In line
Accruals (lower is better)
−19.0%
Goodbeats 97%
−3.9%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
6.1x
Goodbeats 80%
2.9x
5.7x
≈ In line
Days sales outstanding
3 days
Goodbeats 99%
62 days
40 days
▲ Better
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 2 Good · ● 1 Average · ● 9 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Average
Piotroski F-ScoreBad
Growth
Revenue growth (3y)Bad
Growth consistencyBad
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalBad
Operating marginBad
Gross profitabilityBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 24/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$18.5B
$19.3B
$6.8B
$3.2B
$1.9B
Operating income
$13.3B
$9.4B
−$4.2B
−$3.9B
−$3.1B
Net income
$12.2B
$8.4B
−$4.7B
−$3.6B
−$2.8B
Operating cash flow
$13.6B
$5.0B
−$3.1B
−$3.0B
−$1.9B
Operating margin
72.0%
48.9%
-61.9%
-121.9%
-158.1%
Free cash flow
$13.3B
$4.6B
−$3.8B
−$4.1B
−$2.1B
Diluted EPS
$28.29
$20.12
$-12.33
$-9.28
$-7.26
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
8 bullish · 4 neutral · 4 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 0 neutral · 1 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 0 neutral · 1 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
225.3
Bearish
EMA 10
221.3
Bearish
SMA 20
210.4
Bearish
EMA 20
208.8
Bearish
SMA 50
168.4
Bullish
EMA 50
172.0
Bullish
SMA 100
114.3
Bullish
EMA 100
133.9
Bullish
SMA 200
81.34
Bullish
EMA 200
98.61
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
51.02
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
18.22
Bullish
Momentum (12)
8.09
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
29.63
Neutral
Williams %R (14)
-70.37
Neutral
CCI (20)
-4.91
Neutral
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
114.7
S2
147.8
S1
175.2
Pivot
208.2
R1
235.7
R2
268.7
R3
296.1
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in MRNA among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.