Moody's is a provider of credit ratings and of research, data and analytics for financial markets. Its ratings agency assigns credit opinions on bonds and other debt, and it charges issuers fees when they bring securities to market. A second business sells subscription analytics, risk data and software to banks, insurers and corporations. Debt issuance volumes affect the ratings side, while subscriptions provide more recurring income.
Revenue for the last twelve months was $8.2 billion, and it grew by 12.2% a year over three years. The operating margin is 44.8%, and return on invested capital reached 31%. Net debt to EBITDA is 1.5 times. It pays a dividend with a yield of 0.8%. Its X-Ray Score is 61 out of 100. Any one measure gives only a partial picture of the business.
52-wk range $402.28 – $546.88Volume 1,054,263Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$85.7B
52-week range$402.28 – $546.88
Volume (last day)1,054,263
P/E (TTM)31.2
EBIT / EV yield4.0%
Free-cash-flow yield3.5%
Dividend yield0.8%
Revenue (TTM)$8.2B
Net income (TTM)$2.8B
Operating margin44.8%
Return on capital31.4%
Debt incl. leases$7.5B
Cash & securities$1.5B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$486middle half of models $395 – $565
Fair−1.0% to fair value
Average of the 15 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Strong business at a fair price
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Financials peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
21/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield4.0%
Free-cash-flow yield3.5%
Fair value vs price1.0×
GrowthStrong
75/100
Growing faster than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)12.2%
EPS growth (3y)22.5%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityStrong
80/100
Earns high returns on the capital it uses.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital31.4%
Operating margin44.8%
Gross profitability41.7%
Financial healthStrong
76/100
Balance sheet looks strong: debt is well covered.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score9 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.5×
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsFair
50/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield0.8%
Dividends vs free cash flow24%
Dividend growth10.8%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+7.7%Mar '25
+4.5%Jun '25
+10.7%Sep '25
+13.0%Dec '25
+8.1%Mar '26
+15.1%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $2.2B, diluted EPS $5.03.
Other Financial Exchanges & Data companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Moodys Corp
Strengthsinside the company
Return on invested capital is 31.4%, against a median of 13.0% for industry peers.
Revenue has grown 12.2% a year over three years (median 9.7% for industry peers).
Earnings per share have compounded at 22.5% a year over three years.
Operating profit covers interest 50x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Weaknessesinside the company
No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Our Market Compass rates the backdrop for Financials as favourable.
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
No specific threat is flagged by our checks; general market and interest-rate risk still applies.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare MCO with peers and sector
Medians of 8 Financial Exchanges & Data peers and of 70 Financials stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): SPGI48, CME42, ICE52, NDAQ44, MSCI58, COIN38.
Metric
MCO
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
61
50
50
Valuation
21
29
52
Growth
75
62
54
Profitability
80
59
48
Financial health
76
48
50
Dividends
50
54
54
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Financials
MCO ranks #13 of 71 in Financials and #1 of 9 in Financial Exchanges & Data by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for MCO
Each factor is rated by where MCO stands among the 71 Financials stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 14 Good · 2 Average · 6 Bad of 22Growth: 3 · 0 · 0Profitability: 5 · 0 · 0Financial strength: 3 · 1 · 0Valuation: 0 · 0 · 5Cash flow: 3 · 1 · 0Efficiency: 0 · 0 · 1
Factor
MCO
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+12.2%
Goodbeats 78%
+8.3%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+8.9%
Goodbeats 67%
+6.9%
+8.9%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+22.5%
Goodbeats 77%
+12.7%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
75.0%
Goodbeats 88%
47.1%
72.6%
≈ In line
Operating margin
44.8%
Goodbeats 80%
29.1%
40.6%
▲ Better
Net margin
34.3%
Goodbeats 84%
21.8%
29.0%
▲ Better
Return on invested capital
31.4%
Goodbeats 87%
13.5%
–
–
Return on equity
92.4%
Goodbeats 98%
15.7%
57.7%
▲ Better
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
1.5x
Averagebeats 41%
1.1x
1.8x
▲ Better
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 73%
50.0x
–
–
Current ratio
1.19
Goodbeats 76%
1.05
1.72
▼ Worse
Piotroski F-score
9 / 9
Goodbeats 92%
7 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
30.7x
Badbeats 11%
13.8x
37.5x
▲ Better
Price / book
28.3x
Badbeats 2%
2.2x
22.7x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
10.5x
Badbeats 15%
3.1x
11.9x
▲ Better
EV / EBITDA
22.1x
Badbeats 12%
10.8x
25.7x
▲ Better
Free cash flow yield
3.5%
Badbeats 17%
5.8%
2.6%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
36.4%
Goodbeats 76%
23.2%
31.8%
▲ Better
Cash from operations / net income
1.19
Averagebeats 44%
1.25
1.18
≈ In line
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+29.3%
Goodbeats 79%
+12.7%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−3.6%
Goodbeats 79%
−1.0%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
86 days
Badbeats 29%
53 days
101 days
▲ Better
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 12 Good · ● 1 Average · ● 3 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Good
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Good
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Good
Revenue growth (3y)Good
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginGood
Gross profitabilityGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 64/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$6.2B
$5.5B
$5.9B
$7.1B
$7.7B
Operating income
$2.8B
$1.9B
$2.1B
$2.9B
$3.4B
Net income
$2.2B
$1.4B
$1.6B
$2.1B
$2.5B
Operating cash flow
$2.0B
$1.5B
$2.2B
$2.8B
$2.9B
Operating margin
45.7%
34.4%
36.1%
40.6%
43.4%
Free cash flow
$1.9B
$1.2B
$1.9B
$2.5B
$2.6B
Diluted EPS
$11.78
$7.44
$8.73
$11.26
$13.67
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Strongly bullish
12 bullish · 1 neutral · 3 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
475.9
Bullish
EMA 10
476.6
Bullish
SMA 20
464.7
Bullish
EMA 20
472.0
Bullish
SMA 50
477.9
Bullish
EMA 50
473.0
Bullish
SMA 100
474.7
Bullish
EMA 100
472.4
Bullish
SMA 200
466.9
Bullish
EMA 200
471.3
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
61.97
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
3.26
Bullish
Momentum (12)
8.56
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
94.02
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-5.98
Bearish
CCI (20)
129.3
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
467.4
S2
472.1
S1
481.6
Pivot
486.3
R1
495.8
R2
500.5
R3
510.0
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
4.03 USD
Yield on today's price
0.82%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
1.0300
1.0300
1.0300
0.9400
0.9400
0.9400
0.9400
0.8500
0.8500
0.8500
0.8500
0.7700
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in MCO among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
MCO stock splits
MCO has split its stock once since 2005. The latest was a 2-for-1 split on 19 May 2005.