Marriott International is a hotel company that franchises, manages and licenses hotels and resorts rather than owning most of them. Its brands include Ritz-Carlton, St. Regis, JW Marriott, Sheraton, Westin, Courtyard and Residence Inn, and its Marriott Bonvoy programme is a loyalty scheme for guests. Hotel owners and franchisees operate properties under these names across the world, while travellers and corporate clients book stays.
Marriott earns revenue mainly from franchise and management fees paid by hotel owners, plus fees tied to co-branded credit cards. Over the last twelve months it was $26.9 billion, growing at 8.0% a year across the last three years. The operating margin is 15.8%, and the business earns a profit of 27% on the capital invested in it. It carries net debt of 3.9 times EBITDA. The company pays a dividend with a yield of 0.7%. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 42 out of 100.
52-wk range $256.76 – $410.98Volume 2,657,561Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$105.0B
52-week range$256.76 – $410.98
Volume (last day)2,657,561
P/E (TTM)41.3
EBIT / EV yield3.5%
Free-cash-flow yield3.0%
Dividend yield0.7%
Revenue (TTM)$26.9B
Net income (TTM)$2.6B
Operating margin15.8%
Return on capital26.5%
Debt incl. leases$16.9B
Cash & securities$462M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$307middle half of models $225 – $372
Overvalued−22.6% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, priced high
Our models put fair value below today's price, so a lot of good news may already be in the price. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Consumer Discretionary peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
13/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield3.5%
Free-cash-flow yield3.0%
Fair value vs price0.8×
GrowthFair
59/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)8.0%
EPS growth (3y)9.5%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityFair
52/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital26.5%
Operating margin15.8%
Financial healthWeak
43/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score7 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA3.9×
Interest cover5.0×
DividendsFair
52/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield0.7%
Dividends vs free cash flow24%
Dividend growth30.8%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+4.8%Mar '25
+4.7%Jun '25
+3.7%Sep '25
+4.1%Dec '25
+6.2%Mar '26
+4.8%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $7.1B, diluted EPS $2.90.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare MAR with peers and sector
Medians of 7 Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines peers and of 46 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): BKNG70, ABNB52, HLT39, RCL43, CCL56, EXPE62.
Metric
MAR
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
42
52
51
Valuation
13
62
49
Growth
59
77
50
Profitability
52
52
52
Financial health
43
42
50
Dividends
52
38
51
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Consumer Discretionary
MAR ranks #37 of 47 in Consumer Discretionary and #7 of 8 in Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for MAR
Each factor is rated by where MAR stands among the 47 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 1 Good · 9 Average · 8 Bad of 18Growth: 0 · 3 · 0Profitability: 0 · 3 · 0Financial strength: 1 · 0 · 3Valuation: 0 · 0 · 4Cash flow: 0 · 3 · 1
Factor
MAR
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+8.0%
Averagebeats 63%
+6.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+4.3%
Averagebeats 47%
+4.9%
+14.2%
▼ Worse
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+9.5%
Averagebeats 63%
+4.0%
–
–
Profitability
Operating margin
15.8%
Averagebeats 57%
14.9%
15.8%
≈ In line
Net margin
9.6%
Averagebeats 42%
11.4%
9.9%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
26.5%
Averagebeats 56%
24.6%
–
–
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
3.9x
Badbeats 24%
1.8x
3.7x
≈ In line
Interest cover
5.0x
Badbeats 17%
25.3x
5.4x
≈ In line
Current ratio
0.53
Badbeats 13%
1.10
0.43
▲ Better
Piotroski F-score
7 / 9
Goodbeats 76%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
40.6x
Badbeats 14%
21.1x
32.6x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
3.9x
Badbeats 24%
2.1x
3.2x
▼ Worse
EV / EBITDA
28.6x
Badbeats 14%
15.0x
24.3x
▼ Worse
Free cash flow yield
3.0%
Badbeats 24%
4.3%
3.1%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
11.6%
Averagebeats 60%
10.8%
9.8%
▲ Better
Cash from operations / net income
1.44
Averagebeats 60%
1.37
1.07
▲ Better
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+8.7%
Averagebeats 44%
+12.1%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−4.1%
Badbeats 28%
−5.3%
–
–
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 2 Good · ● 6 Average · ● 7 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Average
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDABad
Interest coverBad
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginAverage
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 39/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$13.9B
$20.8B
$23.7B
$25.1B
$26.2B
Operating income
$1.8B
$3.5B
$3.9B
$3.8B
$4.1B
Net income
$1.1B
$2.4B
$3.1B
$2.4B
$2.6B
Operating cash flow
$1.2B
$2.4B
$3.2B
$2.7B
$3.2B
Operating margin
12.6%
16.7%
16.3%
15.0%
15.8%
Free cash flow
$994M
$2.0B
$2.7B
$2.0B
$2.6B
Diluted EPS
$3.34
$7.24
$10.18
$8.33
$9.51
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
12 bullish · 0 neutral · 4 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 0 neutral · 1 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
384.1
Bullish
EMA 10
386.0
Bullish
SMA 20
370.9
Bullish
EMA 20
374.7
Bullish
SMA 50
355.5
Bullish
EMA 50
363.6
Bullish
SMA 100
365.0
Bullish
EMA 100
359.4
Bullish
SMA 200
352.9
Bullish
EMA 200
346.8
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
72.55
Bearish
MACD (12, 26)
12.61
Bullish
Momentum (12)
9.83
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
80.01
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-19.99
Bearish
CCI (20)
133.2
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
383.8
S2
389.0
S1
392.9
Pivot
398.1
R1
402.0
R2
407.2
R3
411.1
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
2.80 USD
Yield on today's price
0.71%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
0.7300
0.7300
0.6700
0.6700
0.6700
0.6700
0.6300
0.6300
0.6300
0.6300
0.5200
0.5200
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in MAR among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
MAR stock splits
MAR has split its stock once since 2006. The latest was a 2-for-1 split on 12 Jun 2006.