See inside every stock. Pro
S&P 5007,663▼ 1.21%Nasdaq26,009▼ 2.60%Dow Jones52,868▲ 0.02%Nasdaq 10028,959▼ 2.90%VIX19.03▲ 14.09%US Dollar101.62▼ 0.16%Gold spot4,093▼ 0.80%WTI100.86▲ 1.40%

Loews Corp (L)

Financials · Multi-line Insurance · US stock · S&P 500 component
$113.68 ▲ +1.96 (1.75%)
At close · USD · Volume 729,729
Compare with AIG
Fair valueFair
$120 +5.6% to fair value
$60fair band $102–$146$180
Day's range
$111.70 – $113.80
52-week range
$97.38 – $121.01

About Loews Corp

Loews is a diversified holding company whose largest subsidiary is CNA Financial, a commercial property and casualty insurer. It also owns Boardwalk Pipelines, which transports natural gas, and Loews Hotels, along with other holdings. Revenue comes mainly from insurance premiums and investment income at CNA, pipeline transportation fees, and hotel operations, so results reflect a mix of unrelated businesses.

Loews Corp generated $18.7 billion of revenue in the last twelve months, with sales that expanded at 9.5% a year across three years. The operating margin is 14.7% and the return on invested capital is 10%. A dividend is paid, with a yield of 0.2%. Its X-Ray Score is 49 out of 100.

52-wk range $97.38 – $121.01Volume 729,729Daily, split-adjusted

Vitals

Market cap$23.4B
52-week range$97.38 – $121.01
Volume (last day)729,729
P/E (TTM)14.0
EBIT / EV yield10.1%
Free-cash-flow yield7.6%
Dividend yield0.2%
Revenue (TTM)$18.7B
Net income (TTM)$1.7B
Operating margin14.7%
Return on capital9.7%
Debt incl. leases$8.9B
Cash & securities$6.1B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.

Fair value estimate

$120middle half of models $110 – $126
Fair +5.6% to fair value
Average of the 3 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $114
Undervalued < $102Fair $102 – $146Overvalued > $146
P/E multiple
$113
P/B multiple
$108
P/S multiple
$140
Dividend discount, stable · not used
$15
Dividend discount, multi-stage · not used
$31
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.

What this means

Weak business, fairly priced

The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.

Before you invest · decision checklist

Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.

The five-lens scan

Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Financials peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.

Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data

Valuation Fair
58/100
Priced about in line with its sector.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield10.1%
Free-cash-flow yield7.6%
Fair value vs price1.1×
Growth Fair
55/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)9.5%
EPS growth (3y)33.1%
Growth consistency100%
Profitability Weak
41/100
Earns lower returns on its capital than most peers.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital9.7%
Operating margin14.7%
Financial health Fair
51/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score8 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.0×
Interest cover6.2×
Dividends Weak
27/100
Dividend is modest or less certain than peers.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield0.2%
Dividends vs free cash flow3%
Dividend growth-5.2%

Quarterly results: last 6 quarters

+6.2%
Mar '25
+6.7%
Jun '25
+4.6%
Sep '25
+4.1%
Dec '25
+1.4%
Mar '26
+3.9%
Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $4.7B, diluted EPS $2.16.

Compare with peers

AIZ Assurant, Inc.66 AIG American International...34
Other Multi-line Insurance companies by X-Ray Score.

SWOT analysis: Loews Corp

Strengthsinside the company
  • Earnings per share have compounded at 33.1% a year over three years.
  • Free cash flow equals 7.6% of the market value, which funds dividends, buybacks or debt paydown.
  • Passes 8 of the 9 Piotroski tests, which points to improving profitability, funding and efficiency.
Weaknessesinside the company
  • Operating margin of 14.7% is thin against 29.3% for sector peers.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
  • Our Market Compass rates the backdrop for Financials as favourable.
  • Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
  • No specific threat is flagged by our checks; general market and interest-rate risk still applies.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.

Compare L with peers and sector

Medians of 70 Financials peers and of 70 Financials stocks in our universe. Largest peers (X-Ray Score): JPM 49, MA 57, BAC 48, MS 34, GS 49, WFC 38.
MetricLPeersSector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)495050
Valuation585252
Growth555454
Profitability414949
Financial health515050
Dividends275454

Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Financials

L ranks #42 of 71 in Financials by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
CompanyX-Ray Score
#1 PGR Progressive Corp69
#2 SCHW Schwab Charles Corp68
#3 AMP Ameriprise Financial Inc67
#4 AIZ Assurant, Inc.66
#5 PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc.65
…
#42 L Loews Corp (this stock)49
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.

Factor ratings for L

Each factor is rated by where L stands among the 71 Financials stocks in our universe.

Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range

For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.

In total: 3 Good · 2 Average · 3 Bad of 8 Growth: 1 · 1 · 1 Profitability: 0 · 0 · 2 Valuation: 2 · 1 · 0
FactorLRatingSector medianOwn 5-year medianAgainst own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year+9.5% Average beats 56% +8.3% – –
Revenue growth, last year+5.4% Bad beats 33% +6.9% +10.1% ▼ Worse
EPS growth, 3 years a year+33.1% Good beats 85% +12.7% – –
Profitability
Net margin9.0% Bad beats 16% 21.8% 9.0% ≈ In line
Return on equity8.8% Bad beats 19% 15.7% 8.8% ≈ In line
Valuation
P/E ratio13.9x Average beats 49% 13.8x 13.2x ≈ In line
Price / book1.2x Good beats 81% 2.2x 1.0x ≈ In line
Price / sales1.3x Good beats 92% 3.1x 1.0x ≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings), and banks and insurers are rated only on the factors that apply to them. A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.

Fundamentals checklist

● 4 Good · ● 5 Average · ● 4 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashAverage
Free-cash-flow yieldGood
Risk models
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Good
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Bad
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverBad
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalBad
Operating marginBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 48/100.

Financials

FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25
Revenue$14.7B$14.0B$15.9B$17.5B$18.5B
Operating income$2.6B$1.5B$2.4B$2.3B$2.7B
Net income$1.6B$822M$1.4B$1.4B$1.7B
Operating cash flow$2.6B$3.3B$3.9B$3.0B$3.3B
Operating margin17.6%10.6%14.9%13.2%14.7%
Free cash flow$2.1B$2.7B$3.2B$2.4B$2.7B
Diluted EPS$6.00$3.38$6.29$6.41$7.97
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.

Technical summary

Daily
Bullish
12 bullish · 0 neutral · 4 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
10 bullish · 1 neutral · 1 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10109.8Bullish
EMA 10110.3Bullish
SMA 20107.7Bullish
EMA 20109.0Bullish
SMA 50108.7Bullish
EMA 50109.1Bullish
SMA 100110.7Bullish
EMA 100109.5Bullish
SMA 200109.1Bullish
EMA 200107.8Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)71.87Bearish
MACD (12, 26)1.03Bullish
Momentum (12)6.78Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)98.65Bearish
Williams %R (14)-1.35Bearish
CCI (20)174.5Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
110.2
S2
111.0
S1
112.3
Pivot
113.1
R1
114.4
R2
115.2
R3
116.5
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.

Dividends

Paid, last 12 months
0.25 USD
Yield on today's price
0.22%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend dateAmount per share
0.0630
0.0630
0.0630
0.0630
0.0630
0.0630
0.0630
0.0630
0.0630
0.0630
0.0630
0.0630
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.

ETFs that hold L

ETFShare of the fund
KIE SPDR S&P Insurance1.88%
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility1.29%
RPV Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value0.81%
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap0.40%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor0.39%
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor0.37%
SCHM Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap0.32%
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value0.32%
The eight funds with the largest weight in L among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.

L stock splits

L has split its stock 3 times since 1995. The latest was a 3-for-1 split on 9 May 2006.

Full L stock split history →

L SEC filings

10-QSEC EDGAR
Quarterly report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations
8-KSEC EDGAR
Shareholder vote results
10-QSEC EDGAR
Quarterly report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations
DEF 14ASEC EDGAR
Proxy statement
8-KSEC EDGAR
Other events
424B5SEC EDGAR
424B5

Where the numbers come from

Statements SEC EDGAR filings (10-K, 10-Q), quarters derived from year-to-date figures.
Prices end-of-day closes, split-adjusted.
Industry inputs beta, multiples and equity risk premium from Damodaran Online (NYU Stern).
Read the full methodology →

StocksXray is for education only and is not financial advice. Scores and fair values are model estimates from public filings and carry uncertainty.