Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR)
Industrials · Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components · US stock · S&P 500 component
$74.11
▼ -4.95 (6.26%)
Fair valueFair
$77 +4.4% to fair value
$39fair band $66–$94$116
Day's range
$73.16 – $76.83
52-week range
$68.07 – $100.96
About Ingersoll Rand Inc.
Ingersoll Rand makes air compressors, vacuum pumps, blowers and fluid-handling equipment used in industrial processes. Its products serve manufacturers, energy and chemical companies, medical and laboratory customers, food and beverage producers and water utilities, and the company also provides parts, service and aftermarket support. Operations are organised into an industrial technologies and services business and a precision and science technologies business.
Ingersoll Rand earns revenue from original equipment and from the parts, service and consumables that customers need over time. Revenue for the last twelve months was $7.9 billion, and it has grown at 8.9% a year across the last three years. The operating margin is 18.1%, and the business earns a profit of 8% on the capital invested in it. It carries net debt of 1.8 times EBITDA. The company pays a dividend with a yield of 0.1%. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 47 out of 100.
Price chart
52-wk range $68.07 – $100.96Volume 9,284,999Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$29.0B
52-week range$68.07 – $100.96
Volume (last day)9,284,999
P/E (TTM)30.6
EBIT / EV yield4.4%
Free-cash-flow yield4.2%
Dividend yield0.1%
Revenue (TTM)$7.9B
Net income (TTM)$959M
Operating margin18.1%
Return on capital8.3%
Debt incl. leases$4.8B
Cash & securities$1.2B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$77middle half of models $75 – $87
Fair
+4.4% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $74
Undervalued < $66Fair $66 – $94Overvalued > $94
P/E multiple
$79
P/B multiple
$78
P/S multiple
$77
EV/EBITDA multiple
$87
EV/EBIT multiple
$87
EV/revenue multiple
$75
10-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$95
5-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$95
10-year DCF, revenue exit
$89
5-year DCF, revenue exit
$87
10-year DCF, growth exit
$58
5-year DCF, growth exit
$51
Dividend discount, stable · not used
$3
Dividend discount, multi-stage · not used
$6
Earnings power value
$51
Growth the price implies
17.2%/yr
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Industrials peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
Valuation
Fair
59/100
Priced about in line with its sector.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield4.4%
Free-cash-flow yield4.2%
Fair value vs price1.0×
Growth
Fair
61/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)8.9%
EPS growth (3y)-0.5%
Growth consistency100%
Profitability
Weak
31/100
Earns lower returns on its capital than most peers.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital8.3%
Operating margin18.1%
Gross profitability18.7%
Financial health
Weak
42/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score6 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.8×
Interest cover5.6×
Dividends
Weak
36/100
Dividend is modest or less certain than peers.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield0.1%
Dividends vs free cash flow3%
Dividend growth-0.6%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+2.8%
Mar '25
+4.6%
Jun '25
+5.1%
Sep '25
+10.1%
Dec '25
+7.6%
Mar '26
+8.5%
Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $2.0B, diluted EPS $0.66.
Compare with peers
SNA Snap-on Inc66 PNR PENTAIR plc62 XYL Xylem Inc.55 GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc.55Other Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Ingersoll Rand Inc.
Strengthsinside the company
- No standout strength in the figures we track.
Weaknessesinside the company
- No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
- No specific opportunity is visible in our valuation, sector or growth data.
Threatsvaluation and setting
- No specific threat is flagged by our checks; general market and interest-rate risk still applies.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare IR with peers and sector
Medians of 13 Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components peers and of 80 Industrials stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): PH 50, ITW 46, GWW 55, OTIS 55, DOV 49, XYL 55.
| Metric | IR | Peers | Sector |
|---|---|---|---|
| X-Ray Score (out of 100) | 47 | 50 | 51 |
| Valuation | 59 | 52 | 44 |
| Growth | 61 | 37 | 50 |
| Profitability | 31 | 51 | 51 |
| Financial health | 42 | 56 | 49 |
| Dividends | 36 | 55 | 53 |
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Industrials
IR ranks #54 of 81 in Industrials and #11 of 14 in Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for IR
Each factor is rated by where IR stands among the 81 Industrials stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 4 Good · 12 Average · 6 Bad of 22
Growth: 1 · 1 · 1
Profitability: 1 · 2 · 2
Financial strength: 1 · 2 · 1
Valuation: 1 · 4 · 0
Cash flow: 0 · 2 · 1
Efficiency: 0 · 1 · 1
| Factor | IR | Rating | Sector median | Own 5-year median | Against own history |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth | |||||
| Revenue growth, 3 years a year | +8.9% | Good beats 73% | +5.6% | – | – |
| Revenue growth, last year | +5.7% | Average beats 57% | +4.5% | +14.8% | ▼ Worse |
| EPS growth, 3 years a year | −0.5% | Bad beats 33% | +5.7% | – | – |
| Profitability | |||||
| Gross margin | 42.8% | Good beats 69% | 38.0% | 41.9% | ≈ In line |
| Operating margin | 18.1% | Average beats 60% | 17.5% | 15.0% | ▲ Better |
| Net margin | 12.1% | Average beats 49% | 12.8% | 10.9% | ▲ Better |
| Return on invested capital | 8.3% | Bad beats 12% | 14.9% | – | – |
| Return on equity | 9.4% | Bad beats 10% | 23.7% | 6.6% | ▲ Better |
| Financial strength | |||||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.8x | Average beats 49% | 1.8x | 1.3x | ▼ Worse |
| Interest cover | 5.6x | Bad beats 13% | 21.4x | 6.5x | ≈ In line |
| Current ratio | 1.62 | Good beats 74% | 1.25 | 2.29 | ▼ Worse |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 / 9 | Average beats 41% | 6 / 9 | – | – |
| Valuation | |||||
| P/E ratio | 30.3x | Average beats 45% | 28.9x | 43.9x | ▲ Better |
| Price / book | 2.9x | Good beats 85% | 6.2x | 3.1x | ≈ In line |
| Price / sales | 3.7x | Average beats 45% | 3.5x | 4.6x | ▲ Better |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.6x | Average beats 61% | 18.5x | 21.4x | ▲ Better |
| Free cash flow yield | 4.2% | Average beats 59% | 3.8% | 3.8% | ≈ In line |
| Cash flow | |||||
| Free cash flow margin | 15.4% | Average beats 56% | 13.8% | 17.2% | ▼ Worse |
| Cash from operations / net income | 1.41 | Average beats 53% | 1.39 | 1.77 | ▼ Worse |
| Accruals (lower is better) | −2.1% | Bad beats 33% | −3.2% | – | – |
| Efficiency | |||||
| Inventory turnover | 3.7x | Average beats 41% | 4.0x | 3.7x | ≈ In line |
| Days sales outstanding | 70 days | Bad beats 23% | 57 days | 67 days | ≈ In line |
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 4 Good · ● 7 Average · ● 4 BadCash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Free-cash-flow yieldAverage
Risk models
Altman Z''Average
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Good
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverBad
Valuation
Fair value vs priceGood
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalBad
Operating marginAverage
Gross profitabilityBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 48/100.
Financials
| FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $5.9B | $6.9B | $7.2B | $7.7B |
| Operating income | $566M | $817M | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Net income | $563M | $605M | $779M | $839M | $581M |
| Operating cash flow | – | – | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Operating margin | 11.0% | 13.8% | 16.9% | 18.0% | 15.0% |
| Free cash flow | – | – | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Diluted EPS | $1.34 | $1.47 | $1.90 | $2.06 | $1.45 |
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bearish
4 bullish · 1 neutral · 11 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bearish
0 bullish · 1 neutral · 11 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bearish
0 bullish · 1 neutral · 7 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
| SMA 10 | 77.99 | Bearish |
| EMA 10 | 77.42 | Bearish |
| SMA 20 | 77.41 | Bearish |
| EMA 20 | 77.22 | Bearish |
| SMA 50 | 76.93 | Bearish |
| EMA 50 | 77.50 | Bearish |
| SMA 100 | 78.57 | Bearish |
| EMA 100 | 78.38 | Bearish |
| SMA 200 | 81.36 | Bearish |
| EMA 200 | 79.69 | Bearish |
Oscillators (daily)
| RSI (14) | 38.75 | Neutral |
| MACD (12, 26) | 0.24 | Bullish |
| Momentum (12) | -6.44 | Bearish |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 12.47 | Bullish |
| Williams %R (14) | -87.53 | Bullish |
| CCI (20) | -156.1 | Bullish |
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3 68.90 | S2 71.03 | S1 72.57 | Pivot 74.70 | R1 76.24 | R2 78.37 | R3 79.91 |
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
0.08 USD
Yield on today's price
0.11%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
| Ex-dividend date | Amount per share |
|---|---|
| 0.0200 | |
| 0.0200 | |
| 0.0200 | |
| 0.0200 | |
| 0.0200 | |
| 0.0200 | |
| 0.0200 | |
| 0.0200 | |
| 0.0200 | |
| 0.0200 | |
| 0.0200 | |
| 0.0200 |
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
ETFs that hold IR
| ETF | Share of the fund |
|---|---|
| RSPN Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industria... | 1.40% |
| TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equ... | 1.21% |
| CGGE Capital Group Global Equity | 0.76% |
| MFSV MFS Active Value | 0.75% |
| SPHB Invesco S&P 500 High Beta | 0.71% |
| CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap | 0.59% |
| CGUS Capital Group Core Equity | 0.59% |
| XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR | 0.51% |
The eight funds with the largest weight in IR among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
IR stock splits
IR has split its stock 3 times since 1992. The latest was a 1-for-2 reverse split on 2 Sep 2005.
Full IR stock split history →IR SEC filings
10-QSEC EDGAR
Quarterly report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations
8-KSEC EDGAR
Director or officer change; Shareholder vote results
10-QSEC EDGAR
Quarterly report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations
DEF 14ASEC EDGAR
Proxy statement
10-KSEC EDGAR
Annual report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations
Where the numbers come from
Statements SEC EDGAR filings (10-K, 10-Q), quarters derived from year-to-date figures.
Prices end-of-day closes, split-adjusted.
Industry inputs beta, multiples and equity risk premium from Damodaran Online (NYU Stern).
StocksXray is for education only and is not financial advice. Scores and fair values are model estimates from public filings and carry uncertainty.