See inside every stock. Pro
S&P 5007,663▼ 1.21%Nasdaq26,009▼ 2.60%Dow Jones52,868▲ 0.02%Nasdaq 10028,959▼ 2.90%VIX19.03▲ 14.09%US Dollar101.62▼ 0.16%Gold spot4,093▼ 0.80%WTI100.86▲ 1.40%

Darden Restaurants Inc (DRI)

Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · US stock · S&P 500 component
$217.56 ▲ +3.04 (1.42%)
At close · USD · Volume 816,759
Compare with MCD
Fair valueFair
$237 +8.7% to fair value
$118fair band $201–$287$355
Day's range
$214.01 – $217.87
52-week range
$169.00 – $229.76

About Darden Restaurants Inc

Darden Restaurants owns and operates full-service restaurant brands in the United States and Canada, with Olive Garden and LongHorn Steakhouse among its best known. It earns money by selling meals and drinks to dine-in and takeout guests, and it also licenses some brands abroad. Food, labour and occupancy costs are its main expenses, so traffic, menu pricing and cost control shape results.

The company reported trailing revenue of $13.4 billion and three-year growth of 8.0% a year. Profitability figures show an operating margin of 11.7% and a return on invested capital of 31%. Its net debt to EBITDA ratio stands at 1.1 times. The dividend yield is 2.9%. Its X-Ray Score is 54 out of 100.

52-wk range $169.00 – $229.76Volume 816,759Daily, split-adjusted

Vitals

Market cap$24.9B
52-week range$169.00 – $229.76
Volume (last day)816,759
P/E (TTM)21.3
EBIT / EV yield5.7%
Free-cash-flow yield–
Dividend yield2.9%
Revenue (TTM)$13.4B
Net income (TTM)$1.2B
Operating margin11.7%
Return on capital30.6%
Debt incl. leases$2.6B
Cash & securities$221M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.

Fair value estimate

$237middle half of models $215 – $246
Fair +8.7% to fair value
Average of the 14 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $218
Undervalued < $201Fair $201 – $287Overvalued > $287
P/E multiple
$214
P/B multiple
$185
P/S multiple
$241
EV/EBITDA multiple
$230
EV/EBIT multiple
$218
EV/revenue multiple
$241
10-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$246
5-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$245
10-year DCF, revenue exit
$248
5-year DCF, revenue exit
$247
10-year DCF, growth exit
$206
5-year DCF, growth exit
$198
Dividend discount, stable
$355
Dividend discount, multi-stage · not used
$695
Earnings power value
$237
Growth the price implies
7.2%/yr
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.

What this means

Weak business, fairly priced

The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.

Before you invest · decision checklist

Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.

The five-lens scan

Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Consumer Discretionary peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.

Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data

Valuation Fair
55/100
Priced about in line with its sector.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield5.7%
Fair value vs price1.1×
Growth Fair
68/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)8.0%
EPS growth (3y)9.1%
Growth consistency100%
Profitability Fair
53/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital30.6%
Operating margin11.7%
Gross profitability20.5%
Financial health Weak
38/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score5 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.1×
Interest coverNo interest cost
Dividends Fair
54/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield2.9%
Dividend growth5.5%

Quarterly results: last 6 quarters

+10.6%
May '25
+10.4%
Aug '25
+7.3%
Nov '25
+5.9%
Feb '26
+13.7%
May '26
+5.1%
Aug '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $3.2B, diluted EPS $2.04.

Compare with peers

CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill...64 DPZ Dominos Pizza Inc64 MCD Mcdonalds Corp53 YUM Yum Brands Inc48
Other Restaurants companies by X-Ray Score.

SWOT analysis: Darden Restaurants Inc

Strengthsinside the company
  • Return on invested capital is 30.6%, against a median of 33.2% for industry peers.
  • Operating profit covers interest 50x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Weaknessesinside the company
  • Operating margin of 11.7% is thin against 19.7% for industry peers.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
  • Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
  • No specific threat is flagged by our checks; general market and interest-rate risk still applies.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.

Compare DRI with peers and sector

Medians of 5 Restaurants peers and of 46 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe. Largest peers (X-Ray Score): MCD 53, SBUX 31, YUM 48, CMG 64, DPZ 64.
MetricDRIPeersSector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)545350
Valuation555048
Growth685550
Profitability536652
Financial health383650
Dividends545851

Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Consumer Discretionary

DRI ranks #15 of 47 in Consumer Discretionary and #3 of 6 in Restaurants by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
CompanyX-Ray Score
#1 DECK Deckers Outdoor Corp85
#2 LULU lululemon athletica inc.76
#3 BKNG Booking Holdings Inc.70
#4 LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp64
#5 CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc64
…
#15 DRI Darden Restaurants Inc (this stock)54
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.

Factor ratings for DRI

Each factor is rated by where DRI stands among the 47 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.

Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range

For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.

In total: 4 Good · 8 Average · 5 Bad of 17 Growth: 1 · 2 · 0 Profitability: 1 · 2 · 2 Financial strength: 1 · 1 · 2 Valuation: 0 · 3 · 1 Efficiency: 1 · 0 · 0
FactorDRIRatingSector medianOwn 5-year medianAgainst own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year+8.0% Average beats 61% +6.5% – –
Revenue growth, last year+9.4% Good beats 75% +4.9% +8.9% ≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year+9.1% Average beats 60% +4.0% – –
Profitability
Gross margin20.3% Bad beats 15% 42.5% 20.1% ≈ In line
Operating margin11.7% Bad beats 32% 14.9% 11.5% ≈ In line
Net margin8.8% Average beats 36% 11.4% 9.1% ≈ In line
Return on invested capital30.6% Average beats 63% 24.6% – –
Return on equity57.2% Good beats 79% 35.3% 45.4% ▲ Better
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA1.1x Average beats 63% 1.8x 0.7x ▼ Worse
Interest cover50.0x Good beats 76% 25.3x 14.1x ▲ Better
Current ratio0.30 Bad beats 8% 1.10 0.42 ▼ Worse
Piotroski F-score5 / 9 Bad beats 24% 6 / 9 – –
Valuation
P/E ratio21.1x Average beats 50% 21.1x 19.7x ≈ In line
Price / book12.0x Bad beats 29% 7.2x 9.0x ▼ Worse
Price / sales1.9x Average beats 59% 2.1x 1.8x ≈ In line
EV / EBITDA12.8x Average beats 63% 15.0x 12.4x ≈ In line
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding3 days Good beats 96% 14 days 3 days ≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.

Fundamentals checklist

● 2 Good · ● 6 Average · ● 5 Bad
Cash quality
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreBad
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginBad
Gross profitabilityBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 49/100.

Financials

FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Revenue$9.6B$10.5B$11.4B$12.1B$13.2B
Operating income$1.2B$1.2B$1.3B$1.4B$1.6B
Net income$953M$982M$1.0B$1.0B$1.2B
Operating cash flow–––––
Operating margin12.1%11.5%11.5%11.3%12.0%
Free cash flow–––––
Diluted EPS$7.39$7.99$8.51$8.86$10.38
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.

Technical summary

Daily
Strongly bullish
12 bullish · 1 neutral · 3 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10210.8Bullish
EMA 10212.0Bullish
SMA 20204.0Bullish
EMA 20208.8Bullish
SMA 50209.9Bullish
EMA 50207.5Bullish
SMA 100206.2Bullish
EMA 100205.6Bullish
SMA 200202.3Bullish
EMA 200201.4Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)62.68Neutral
MACD (12, 26)2.79Bullish
Momentum (12)7.97Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)94.22Bearish
Williams %R (14)-5.78Bearish
CCI (20)111.6Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
211.2
S2
212.6
S1
215.1
Pivot
216.5
R1
219.0
R2
220.3
R3
222.8
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.

Dividends

Paid, last 12 months
6.24 USD
Yield on today's price
2.87%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend dateAmount per share
1.6200
1.6200
1.5000
1.5000
1.5000
1.5000
1.4000
1.4000
1.4000
1.4000
1.3100
1.3100
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.

ETFs that hold DRI

ETFShare of the fund
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Quality Shareholder Yi...0.72%
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth0.64%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity0.59%
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector S...0.59%
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced0.43%
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary I...0.41%
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value0.41%
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary0.39%
The eight funds with the largest weight in DRI among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.

DRI stock splits

DRI has split its stock once since 2002. The latest was a 3-for-2 split on 2 May 2002.

Full DRI stock split history →

DRI SEC filings

10-QSEC EDGAR
Quarterly report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Shareholder vote results
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations
DEF 14ASEC EDGAR
Proxy statement
10-KSEC EDGAR
Annual report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations
10-QSEC EDGAR
Quarterly report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations

Where the numbers come from

Statements SEC EDGAR filings (10-K, 10-Q), quarters derived from year-to-date figures.
Prices end-of-day closes, split-adjusted.
Industry inputs beta, multiples and equity risk premium from Damodaran Online (NYU Stern).
Read the full methodology →

StocksXray is for education only and is not financial advice. Scores and fair values are model estimates from public filings and carry uncertainty.