Darden Restaurants owns and operates full-service restaurant brands in the United States and Canada, with Olive Garden and LongHorn Steakhouse among its best known. It earns money by selling meals and drinks to dine-in and takeout guests, and it also licenses some brands abroad. Food, labour and occupancy costs are its main expenses, so traffic, menu pricing and cost control shape results.
The company reported trailing revenue of $13.4 billion and three-year growth of 8.0% a year. Profitability figures show an operating margin of 11.7% and a return on invested capital of 31%. Its net debt to EBITDA ratio stands at 1.1 times. The dividend yield is 2.9%. Its X-Ray Score is 54 out of 100.
52-wk range $169.00 – $229.76Volume 816,759Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$24.9B
52-week range$169.00 – $229.76
Volume (last day)816,759
P/E (TTM)21.3
EBIT / EV yield5.7%
Free-cash-flow yield–
Dividend yield2.9%
Revenue (TTM)$13.4B
Net income (TTM)$1.2B
Operating margin11.7%
Return on capital30.6%
Debt incl. leases$2.6B
Cash & securities$221M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$237middle half of models $215 – $246
Fair+8.7% to fair value
Average of the 14 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Consumer Discretionary peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationFair
55/100
Priced about in line with its sector.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield5.7%
Fair value vs price1.1×
GrowthFair
68/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)8.0%
EPS growth (3y)9.1%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityFair
53/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital30.6%
Operating margin11.7%
Gross profitability20.5%
Financial healthWeak
38/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score5 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.1×
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsFair
54/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield2.9%
Dividend growth5.5%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+10.6%May '25
+10.4%Aug '25
+7.3%Nov '25
+5.9%Feb '26
+13.7%May '26
+5.1%Aug '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $3.2B, diluted EPS $2.04.
Return on invested capital is 30.6%, against a median of 33.2% for industry peers.
Operating profit covers interest 50x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Weaknessesinside the company
Operating margin of 11.7% is thin against 19.7% for industry peers.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
No specific threat is flagged by our checks; general market and interest-rate risk still applies.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare DRI with peers and sector
Medians of 5 Restaurants peers and of 46 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): MCD53, SBUX31, YUM48, CMG64, DPZ64.
Metric
DRI
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
54
53
50
Valuation
55
50
48
Growth
68
55
50
Profitability
53
66
52
Financial health
38
36
50
Dividends
54
58
51
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Consumer Discretionary
DRI ranks #15 of 47 in Consumer Discretionary and #3 of 6 in Restaurants by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for DRI
Each factor is rated by where DRI stands among the 47 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 4 Good · 8 Average · 5 Bad of 17Growth: 1 · 2 · 0Profitability: 1 · 2 · 2Financial strength: 1 · 1 · 2Valuation: 0 · 3 · 1Efficiency: 1 · 0 · 0
Factor
DRI
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+8.0%
Averagebeats 61%
+6.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+9.4%
Goodbeats 75%
+4.9%
+8.9%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+9.1%
Averagebeats 60%
+4.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
20.3%
Badbeats 15%
42.5%
20.1%
≈ In line
Operating margin
11.7%
Badbeats 32%
14.9%
11.5%
≈ In line
Net margin
8.8%
Averagebeats 36%
11.4%
9.1%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
30.6%
Averagebeats 63%
24.6%
–
–
Return on equity
57.2%
Goodbeats 79%
35.3%
45.4%
▲ Better
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
1.1x
Averagebeats 63%
1.8x
0.7x
▼ Worse
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 76%
25.3x
14.1x
▲ Better
Current ratio
0.30
Badbeats 8%
1.10
0.42
▼ Worse
Piotroski F-score
5 / 9
Badbeats 24%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
21.1x
Averagebeats 50%
21.1x
19.7x
≈ In line
Price / book
12.0x
Badbeats 29%
7.2x
9.0x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
1.9x
Averagebeats 59%
2.1x
1.8x
≈ In line
EV / EBITDA
12.8x
Averagebeats 63%
15.0x
12.4x
≈ In line
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
3 days
Goodbeats 96%
14 days
3 days
≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 2 Good · ● 6 Average · ● 5 Bad
Cash quality
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreBad
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginBad
Gross profitabilityBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 49/100.
Financials
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
Revenue
$9.6B
$10.5B
$11.4B
$12.1B
$13.2B
Operating income
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.6B
Net income
$953M
$982M
$1.0B
$1.0B
$1.2B
Operating cash flow
–
–
–
–
–
Operating margin
12.1%
11.5%
11.5%
11.3%
12.0%
Free cash flow
–
–
–
–
–
Diluted EPS
$7.39
$7.99
$8.51
$8.86
$10.38
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Strongly bullish
12 bullish · 1 neutral · 3 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
210.8
Bullish
EMA 10
212.0
Bullish
SMA 20
204.0
Bullish
EMA 20
208.8
Bullish
SMA 50
209.9
Bullish
EMA 50
207.5
Bullish
SMA 100
206.2
Bullish
EMA 100
205.6
Bullish
SMA 200
202.3
Bullish
EMA 200
201.4
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
62.68
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
2.79
Bullish
Momentum (12)
7.97
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
94.22
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-5.78
Bearish
CCI (20)
111.6
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
211.2
S2
212.6
S1
215.1
Pivot
216.5
R1
219.0
R2
220.3
R3
222.8
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
6.24 USD
Yield on today's price
2.87%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
1.6200
1.6200
1.5000
1.5000
1.5000
1.5000
1.4000
1.4000
1.4000
1.4000
1.3100
1.3100
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in DRI among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
DRI stock splits
DRI has split its stock once since 2002. The latest was a 3-for-2 split on 2 May 2002.