Domino's Pizza is a pizza restaurant company that sells through a network of franchised and a few company-owned stores around the world, offering delivery, carryout and online ordering. Most stores are run by independent franchisees. Revenue comes from royalties and fees paid by franchisees, sales of food and supplies from the company's distribution centers, and sales at the stores it owns directly.
The figures show revenue of $5.1 billion for the last twelve months and three-year growth of 2.9% a year. It reports an operating margin of 19.7%. Capital is used to generate a return on invested capital of 111%. Leverage, measured as net debt to EBITDA, is 4.3 times. The company pays a dividend with a yield of 2.4%. The site's X-Ray Score for the company is 64 out of 100.
52-wk range $282.00 – $442.35Volume 658,762Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$10.5B
52-week range$282.00 – $442.35
Volume (last day)658,762
P/E (TTM)17.5
EBIT / EV yield6.6%
Free-cash-flow yield6.0%
Dividend yield2.4%
Revenue (TTM)$5.1B
Net income (TTM)$609M
Operating margin19.7%
Return on capital111.1%
Debt incl. leases$4.9B
Cash & securities$229M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$378middle half of models $356 – $402
Undervalued+19.1% to fair value
Average of the 14 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business at a low price
Our models put fair value above today's price, but models can be wrong, so check the business first. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Consumer Discretionary peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationFair
66/100
Priced about in line with its sector.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield6.6%
Free-cash-flow yield6.0%
Fair value vs price1.2×
GrowthFair
57/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)2.9%
EPS growth (3y)11.9%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityStrong
89/100
Earns high returns on the capital it uses.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital111.1%
Operating margin19.7%
Gross profitability114.8%
Financial healthWeak
36/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score8 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA4.3×
Interest cover5.0×
DividendsFair
67/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield2.4%
Dividends vs free cash flow40%
Dividend growth14.6%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+4.3%Jun '25
+6.2%Sep '25
+6.4%Dec '25
+3.5%Mar '26
+4.3%Jun '26
+3.4%Sep '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $1.2B, diluted EPS $4.60.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare DPZ with peers and sector
Medians of 5 Restaurants peers and of 46 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): MCD53, SBUX31, YUM48, CMG64, DRI54.
Metric
DPZ
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
64
53
50
Valuation
66
50
48
Growth
57
55
50
Profitability
89
63
52
Financial health
36
38
50
Dividends
67
54
51
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Consumer Discretionary
DPZ ranks #6 of 47 in Consumer Discretionary and #2 of 6 in Restaurants by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for DPZ
Each factor is rated by where DPZ stands among the 47 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 8 Good · 8 Average · 5 Bad of 21Growth: 1 · 1 · 1Profitability: 2 · 2 · 0Financial strength: 1 · 0 · 3Valuation: 1 · 3 · 0Cash flow: 2 · 1 · 1Efficiency: 1 · 1 · 0
Factor
DPZ
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+2.9%
Badbeats 21%
+6.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+5.0%
Averagebeats 51%
+4.9%
+5.0%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+11.9%
Goodbeats 68%
+4.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
40.0%
Averagebeats 47%
42.5%
38.7%
≈ In line
Operating margin
19.7%
Goodbeats 74%
14.9%
18.5%
≈ In line
Net margin
12.0%
Averagebeats 62%
11.4%
11.7%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
111.1%
Goodbeats 96%
24.6%
–
–
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
4.3x
Badbeats 15%
1.8x
5.0x
▲ Better
Interest cover
5.0x
Badbeats 19%
25.3x
4.3x
≈ In line
Current ratio
0.49
Badbeats 10%
1.10
1.47
▼ Worse
Piotroski F-score
8 / 9
Goodbeats 92%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
17.3x
Goodbeats 68%
21.1x
27.6x
▲ Better
Price / sales
2.1x
Averagebeats 54%
2.1x
3.2x
▲ Better
EV / EBITDA
13.9x
Averagebeats 57%
15.0x
20.5x
▲ Better
Free cash flow yield
6.0%
Averagebeats 58%
4.3%
3.3%
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
12.5%
Averagebeats 64%
10.8%
10.9%
▲ Better
Cash from operations / net income
1.25
Badbeats 31%
1.37
1.14
≈ In line
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+20.1%
Goodbeats 67%
+12.1%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−8.5%
Goodbeats 83%
−5.3%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
33.9x
Goodbeats 89%
4.2x
37.5x
≈ In line
Days sales outstanding
21 days
Averagebeats 34%
14 days
23 days
≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 9 Good · ● 2 Average · ● 5 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Free-cash-flow yieldAverage
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Good
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Good
Revenue growth (3y)Bad
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDABad
Interest coverBad
Valuation
Fair value vs priceGood
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginGood
Gross profitabilityGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 61/100.
Financials
FY22
FY23
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$4.4B
$4.5B
$4.5B
$4.7B
$4.9B
Operating income
$780M
–
$820M
$879M
$954M
Net income
$510M
$452M
$519M
$584M
$602M
Operating cash flow
$654M
$475M
$591M
$625M
$792M
Operating margin
17.9%
–
18.3%
18.7%
19.3%
Free cash flow
$560M
$388M
$485M
$512M
$672M
Diluted EPS
$13.54
$12.53
$14.66
$16.69
$17.57
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Neutral
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 8 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bearish
2 bullish · 1 neutral · 9 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bearish
0 bullish · 1 neutral · 7 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
307.5
Bullish
EMA 10
308.8
Bullish
SMA 20
303.2
Bullish
EMA 20
307.3
Bullish
SMA 50
316.8
Bullish
EMA 50
313.0
Bullish
SMA 100
318.2
Bearish
EMA 100
321.8
Bearish
SMA 200
342.0
Bearish
EMA 200
341.4
Bearish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
57.12
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-0.08
Bearish
Momentum (12)
4.90
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
98.12
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-1.88
Bearish
CCI (20)
140.5
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
305.0
S2
307.8
S1
312.7
Pivot
315.6
R1
320.5
R2
323.3
R3
328.3
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
7.71 USD
Yield on today's price
2.43%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
15 Dec 2026
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
(upcoming)
1.9900
1.9900
1.9900
1.9900
1.7400
1.7400
1.7400
1.7400
1.5100
1.5100
1.5100
1.5100
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in DPZ among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.