Dell Technologies sells computers, servers, storage systems and networking equipment, along with related software and services, to consumers, businesses and governments. Its client solutions group covers desktops, laptops and monitors, while its infrastructure group supplies data centre hardware, including systems designed for artificial intelligence workloads. It earns money from hardware sales, support contracts and financing, and sells directly and through partners.
Over the latest twelve months the company reported revenue of $151.2 billion, with growth of 3.5% a year across three years. It reports an operating margin of 9.4%, with return on invested capital of 53%. Leverage, measured as net debt to EBITDA, is 1.4 times. A dividend is paid, with a yield of 0.5%. Overall, it receives an X-Ray Score of 53 out of 100. The figures are a snapshot of reported results rather than a forecast.
52-wk range $110.22 – $595.51Volume 6,597,846Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$295.3B
52-week range$110.22 – $595.51
Volume (last day)6,597,846
P/E (TTM)26.6
EBIT / EV yield4.5%
Free-cash-flow yield2.9%
Dividend yield0.5%
Revenue (TTM)$151.2B
Net income (TTM)$11.4B
Operating margin9.4%
Return on capital52.7%
Debt incl. leases$35.3B
Cash & securities$11.6B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$446middle half of models $367 – $524
Fair−1.6% to fair value
Average of the 12 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is High, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Peak-cycle earnings: the current operating margin is more than 1.5x its 7-year average, so multiples applied to today's profit may overstate value; model uncertainty is set to High
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Information Technology peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationFair
59/100
Priced about in line with its sector.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield4.5%
Free-cash-flow yield2.9%
Fair value vs price1.0×
GrowthStrong
73/100
Growing faster than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)3.5%
EPS growth (3y)38.9%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityFair
52/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital52.7%
Operating margin9.4%
Gross profitability23.5%
Financial healthWeak
29/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score6 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.4×
Interest cover8.9×
DividendsFair
52/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield0.5%
Dividends vs free cash flow18%
Dividend growth14.8%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+5.1%May '25
+19.0%Aug '25
+10.8%Oct '25
+39.5%Jan '26
+87.5%May '26
+57.7%Jul '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $47.0B, diluted EPS $6.34.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare DELL with peers and sector
Medians of 9 Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals peers and of 74 Information Technology stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): AAPL53, SNDK73, STX56, WDC52, HPE45, NTAP54.
Metric
DELL
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
53
53
50
Valuation
59
38
50
Growth
73
59
54
Profitability
52
58
49
Financial health
29
61
50
Dividends
52
43
50
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Information Technology
DELL ranks #32 of 75 in Information Technology and #5 of 10 in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for DELL
Each factor is rated by where DELL stands among the 75 Information Technology stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 7 Good · 5 Average · 9 Bad of 21Growth: 2 · 0 · 1Profitability: 1 · 0 · 3Financial strength: 0 · 2 · 2Valuation: 2 · 2 · 0Cash flow: 1 · 0 · 3Efficiency: 1 · 1 · 0
Factor
DELL
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+3.5%
Badbeats 30%
+9.7%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+18.8%
Goodbeats 67%
+13.7%
+8.1%
▲ Better
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+38.9%
Goodbeats 90%
+5.9%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
19.8%
Badbeats 5%
57.8%
22.2%
▼ Worse
Operating margin
9.4%
Badbeats 19%
20.3%
6.1%
▲ Better
Net margin
7.5%
Badbeats 21%
17.8%
4.8%
▲ Better
Return on invested capital
52.7%
Goodbeats 81%
19.4%
–
–
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
1.4x
Averagebeats 36%
0.8x
2.1x
▲ Better
Interest cover
8.9x
Badbeats 25%
23.0x
4.5x
▲ Better
Current ratio
0.96
Badbeats 22%
1.57
0.80
▲ Better
Piotroski F-score
6 / 9
Averagebeats 43%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
26.0x
Averagebeats 66%
33.6x
13.2x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
2.0x
Goodbeats 90%
6.9x
0.7x
▼ Worse
EV / EBITDA
18.4x
Goodbeats 71%
24.7x
8.8x
▼ Worse
Free cash flow yield
2.9%
Averagebeats 47%
3.4%
9.3%
▼ Worse
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
5.7%
Badbeats 11%
22.3%
6.7%
▼ Worse
Cash from operations / net income
1.07
Badbeats 24%
1.39
1.81
▼ Worse
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+147.8%
Goodbeats 98%
+15.4%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−0.6%
Badbeats 19%
−4.4%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
5.7x
Goodbeats 79%
3.9x
13.4x
▼ Worse
Days sales outstanding
55 days
Averagebeats 63%
63 days
45 days
▼ Worse
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 5 Good · ● 4 Average · ● 7 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Free-cash-flow yieldAverage
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Good
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Good
Revenue growth (3y)Bad
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverBad
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldGood
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginBad
Gross profitabilityBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 49/100.
Financials
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
Revenue
$101.2B
$102.3B
$88.4B
$95.6B
$113.5B
Operating income
$4.7B
$5.8B
$5.4B
$6.2B
$8.1B
Net income
$5.7B
$2.4B
$3.4B
$4.6B
$5.9B
Operating cash flow
$10.3B
$3.6B
$8.7B
$4.5B
$11.2B
Operating margin
4.6%
5.6%
6.1%
6.5%
7.2%
Free cash flow
$7.5B
$562M
$5.9B
$1.9B
$8.6B
Diluted EPS
–
$3.24
$4.60
$6.38
$8.68
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bearish
6 bullish · 1 neutral · 9 bearish
Weekly
Bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 4 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 0 neutral · 1 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
502.1
Bearish
EMA 10
491.5
Bearish
SMA 20
529.4
Bearish
EMA 20
511.6
Bearish
SMA 50
513.6
Bearish
EMA 50
503.6
Bearish
SMA 100
466.3
Bearish
EMA 100
452.5
Bullish
SMA 200
320.3
Bullish
EMA 200
365.0
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
37.08
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-16.94
Bearish
Momentum (12)
-21.09
Bearish
Stochastic %K (14)
8.65
Bullish
Williams %R (14)
-91.35
Bullish
CCI (20)
-119.7
Bullish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
416.1
S2
431.5
S1
442.2
Pivot
457.6
R1
468.3
R2
483.7
R3
494.4
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
2.42 USD
Yield on today's price
0.53%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
0.6300
0.6300
0.6300
0.5250
0.5250
0.5250
0.5250
0.4450
0.4450
0.4450
0.4450
0.3700
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in DELL among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.