DoorDash runs an online platform that connects consumers with local merchants, mainly restaurants, grocery stores and retailers, for delivery and pickup. Independent couriers known as Dashers carry the orders, and merchants use the company's tools for ordering, payments and marketing. The service is available in the United States and several other countries, and the company also offers a paid membership called DashPass.
The business earns revenue mainly from commissions charged to merchants, delivery fees paid by consumers, membership fees and advertising. Over the last twelve months revenue was $15.9 billion, and it has grown at 27.7% a year across the last three years. The operating margin is 4.5%, and the business earns a profit of 14% on the capital invested in it. The company does not pay a dividend. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 54 out of 100.
52-wk range $143.30 – $269.00Volume 4,112,337Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$81.7B
52-week range$143.30 – $269.00
Volume (last day)4,112,337
P/E (TTM)97.5
EBIT / EV yield0.9%
Free-cash-flow yield3.2%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$15.9B
Net income (TTM)$841M
Operating margin4.5%
Return on capital14.0%
Debt incl. leasesData missing
Cash & securities$5.3B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$213middle half of models $199 – $228
Fair+14.7% to fair value
Average of the 10 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Low, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Consumer Discretionary peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
39/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield0.9%
Free-cash-flow yield3.2%
Fair value vs price1.1×
GrowthStrong
92/100
Growing faster than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)27.7%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityWeak
37/100
Earns lower returns on its capital than most peers.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital14.0%
Operating margin4.5%
Financial healthFair
55/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score6 / 9
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+20.7%Mar '25
+24.9%Jun '25
+27.3%Sep '25
+37.7%Dec '25
+33.1%Mar '26
+35.6%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $4.5B, diluted EPS $0.46.
SWOT analysis: DoorDash, Inc.
Strengthsinside the company
Revenue has grown 27.7% a year over three years (median 6.4% for sector peers).
Operating profit covers interest 50x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Weaknessesinside the company
Return on invested capital of 14.0% is well below the 24.9% median of sector peers.
Operating margin of 4.5% is thin against 15.0% for sector peers.
Altman Z-score of 1.3 is in the zone linked with financial distress in past studies.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
No specific opportunity is visible in our valuation, sector or growth data.
Threatsvaluation and setting
Trades at 97.1x earnings, 368% above the 20.7x median of sector peers, so the price already assumes better results.
The price trend is down on the daily and weekly signals.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare DASH with peers and sector
Medians of 46 Consumer Discretionary peers and of 46 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): AMZN42, TSLA28, HD40, MCD53, TJX55, BKNG70.
Metric
DASH
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
54
50
50
Valuation
39
49
49
Growth
92
50
50
Profitability
37
52
52
Financial health
55
49
49
Dividends
–
52
52
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Consumer Discretionary
DASH ranks #16 of 47 in Consumer Discretionary by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for DASH
Each factor is rated by where DASH stands among the 47 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 8 Good · 2 Average · 9 Bad of 19Growth: 2 · 0 · 0Profitability: 0 · 0 · 4Financial strength: 2 · 1 · 0Valuation: 0 · 1 · 4Cash flow: 4 · 0 · 0Efficiency: 0 · 0 · 1
Factor
DASH
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+27.7%
Goodbeats 94%
+6.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+27.9%
Goodbeats 97%
+4.9%
+31.2%
▼ Worse
Profitability
Operating margin
4.5%
Badbeats 12%
14.9%
-6.7%
▲ Better
Net margin
5.3%
Badbeats 21%
11.4%
-6.5%
▲ Better
Return on invested capital
14.0%
Badbeats 30%
24.6%
–
–
Return on equity
8.5%
Badbeats 18%
35.3%
-8.2%
▲ Better
Financial strength
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 76%
25.3x
–
–
Current ratio
1.37
Goodbeats 69%
1.10
1.66
▼ Worse
Piotroski F-score
6 / 9
Averagebeats 49%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
97.1x
Badbeats 6%
21.1x
–
–
Price / book
8.2x
Averagebeats 46%
7.2x
9.2x
▲ Better
Price / sales
5.1x
Badbeats 12%
2.1x
6.7x
▲ Better
EV / EBITDA
44.6x
Badbeats 3%
15.0x
–
–
Free cash flow yield
3.2%
Badbeats 28%
4.3%
2.2%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
16.3%
Goodbeats 73%
10.8%
15.8%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
3.37
Goodbeats 88%
1.37
–
–
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+124.9%
Goodbeats 99%
+12.1%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−10.2%
Goodbeats 92%
−5.3%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
25 days
Badbeats 26%
14 days
25 days
≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 6 Good · ● 3 Average · ● 4 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Average
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Good
Revenue growth (3y)Good
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalBad
Operating marginBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 55/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$4.9B
$6.6B
$8.6B
$10.7B
$13.7B
Operating income
−$452M
−$1.1B
−$579M
−$38M
$723M
Net income
−$468M
−$1.4B
−$558M
$123M
$935M
Operating cash flow
$692M
$367M
$1.7B
$2.1B
$2.4B
Operating margin
-9.2%
-17.1%
-6.7%
-0.4%
5.3%
Free cash flow
$563M
$191M
$1.6B
$2.0B
$2.2B
Diluted EPS
$-1.39
$-3.68
$-1.42
$0.29
$2.13
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Strongly bearish
1 bullish · 4 neutral · 11 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bearish
2 bullish · 1 neutral · 9 bearish
Monthly
Neutral
3 bullish · 1 neutral · 4 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
190.6
Bearish
EMA 10
189.3
Bearish
SMA 20
189.4
Bearish
EMA 20
191.2
Bearish
SMA 50
203.0
Bearish
EMA 50
195.0
Bearish
SMA 100
192.9
Bearish
EMA 100
193.4
Bearish
SMA 200
184.0
Bullish
EMA 200
193.3
Bearish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
43.71
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-2.85
Bearish
Momentum (12)
-3.97
Bearish
Stochastic %K (14)
36.79
Neutral
Williams %R (14)
-63.21
Neutral
CCI (20)
-82.35
Neutral
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
175.7
S2
178.3
S1
182.1
Pivot
184.8
R1
188.6
R2
191.3
R3
195.1
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in DASH among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.