Too few of our valuation models give a usable value for this company, so we show no number rather than a misleading one. How fair value works
Day's range
$107.64 – $112.71
52-week range
$101.63 – $254.11
About Charter Communications, Inc.
Charter Communications is a large cable operator in the United States that sells internet, television, mobile and phone services under the Spectrum brand. It also provides connectivity and managed services to businesses and earns advertising income through its local media unit. Most revenue comes from monthly subscription fees from residential and commercial customers, and the business requires heavy ongoing spending to maintain and upgrade its network.
The company reported revenue of $54.4 billion over the last twelve months. Revenue growth over three years averaged 0.5% a year. Operating margin is 23.3% and return on invested capital is 9%. Net debt to EBITDA is 4.4 times. It does not pay a dividend. The X-Ray Score is 56 out of 100. These figures describe past results as reported and are a factual snapshot, not a forecast. Some measures, such as margins for real estate trusts and banks, are defined differently from those of industrial firms, so comparisons should be made with care.
52-wk range $101.63 – $254.11Volume 2,544,545Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$13.6B
52-week range$101.63 – $254.11
Volume (last day)2,544,545
P/E (TTM)3.0
EBIT / EV yield11.3%
Free-cash-flow yield32.2%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$54.4B
Net income (TTM)$4.9B
Operating margin23.3%
Return on capital8.8%
Debt incl. leases$94.0B
Cash & securities$509M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
Data under review
Only 2 valuation models give a usable value for this company, which is too few for a fair value we would stand behind
What this means
Read the lenses below
A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Communication Services peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationStrong
97/100
Cheap against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield11.3%
Free-cash-flow yield32.2%
GrowthWeak
16/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)0.5%
EPS growth (3y)5.6%
Growth consistency60%
ProfitabilityFair
64/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital8.8%
Operating margin23.3%
Financial healthWeak
35/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score6 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA4.4×
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+0.4%Mar '25
+0.6%Jun '25
-0.9%Sep '25
-2.3%Dec '25
-1.0%Mar '26
-1.7%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $13.5B, diluted EPS $10.66.
Free cash flow equals 32.2% of the market value, which funds dividends, buybacks or debt paydown.
Operating profit covers interest 50x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Weaknessesinside the company
Net debt is 4.4x EBITDA, above the 3x level that lenders usually watch.
Altman Z-score of 0.2 is in the zone linked with financial distress in past studies.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Trades at 2.8x earnings, 87% below the 20.8x median of sector peers.
Our Market Compass rates the backdrop for Communication Services as favourable.
Threatsvaluation and setting
Heavy debt makes profits sensitive to interest rates and refinancing conditions.
Too few of our valuation models give a usable value for this company to state a fair value; treat price comparisons with caution.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare CHTR with peers and sector
Medians of 17 Communication Services peers and of 17 Communication Services stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): GOOG50, META58, NFLX58, CCZ48, DIS56, VZ49.
Metric
CHTR
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
56
51
51
Valuation
97
50
50
Growth
16
55
55
Profitability
64
52
52
Financial health
35
52
52
Dividends
–
47
47
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Communication Services
CHTR ranks #6 of 18 in Communication Services by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for CHTR
Each factor is rated by where CHTR stands among the 18 Communication Services stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 10 Good · 5 Average · 6 Bad of 21Growth: 0 · 1 · 2Profitability: 2 · 2 · 0Financial strength: 1 · 1 · 2Valuation: 5 · 0 · 0Cash flow: 1 · 1 · 2Efficiency: 1 · 0 · 0
Factor
CHTR
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+0.5%
Badbeats 14%
+5.6%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
−0.6%
Badbeats 14%
+7.7%
+1.1%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+5.6%
Averagebeats 48%
+6.6%
–
–
Profitability
Operating margin
23.3%
Goodbeats 69%
19.3%
23.0%
≈ In line
Net margin
9.1%
Averagebeats 42%
10.6%
9.1%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
8.8%
Averagebeats 42%
10.4%
–
–
Return on equity
29.0%
Goodbeats 69%
17.9%
33.1%
▼ Worse
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
4.4x
Badbeats 16%
1.4x
4.6x
≈ In line
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 78%
11.8x
–
–
Current ratio
0.36
Badbeats 3%
1.10
0.31
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
6 / 9
Averagebeats 44%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
2.8x
Goodbeats 97%
20.8x
11.0x
▲ Better
Price / book
0.8x
Goodbeats 97%
2.8x
5.3x
▲ Better
Price / sales
0.2x
Goodbeats 97%
2.0x
1.0x
▲ Better
EV / EBITDA
5.2x
Goodbeats 97%
13.4x
7.3x
▲ Better
Free cash flow yield
32.2%
Goodbeats 96%
3.9%
6.8%
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
8.0%
Badbeats 22%
15.7%
8.1%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
3.34
Goodbeats 77%
1.98
3.17
≈ In line
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
−7.3%
Badbeats 16%
+11.7%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−7.4%
Averagebeats 59%
−5.8%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
24 days
Goodbeats 78%
47 days
20 days
▼ Worse
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 4 Good · ● 3 Average · ● 7 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashAverage
Free-cash-flow yieldGood
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Bad
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Bad
Revenue growth (3y)Bad
Growth consistencyBad
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDABad
Interest coverGood
Valuation
EBIT / EV yieldGood
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 52/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$51.7B
$54.0B
$54.6B
$55.1B
$54.8B
Operating income
$10.5B
$12.0B
$12.6B
$13.1B
$12.9B
Net income
$4.7B
$5.1B
$4.6B
$5.1B
$5.0B
Operating cash flow
$16.2B
$14.9B
$14.4B
$14.4B
$16.1B
Operating margin
20.4%
22.1%
23.0%
23.8%
23.6%
Free cash flow
$8.6B
$5.5B
$3.3B
$3.2B
$4.4B
Diluted EPS
$24.47
$30.74
$29.99
$34.97
$36.21
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bearish
4 bullish · 2 neutral · 10 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bearish
0 bullish · 1 neutral · 11 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bearish
1 bullish · 0 neutral · 7 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
107.6
Bullish
EMA 10
109.1
Bullish
SMA 20
108.8
Bullish
EMA 20
112.1
Bearish
SMA 50
129.5
Bearish
EMA 50
123.3
Bearish
SMA 100
133.4
Bearish
EMA 100
137.5
Bearish
SMA 200
167.9
Bearish
EMA 200
166.1
Bearish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
45.53
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-5.24
Bearish
Momentum (12)
2.88
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
90.21
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-9.79
Bearish
CCI (20)
52.97
Neutral
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
103.6
S2
105.6
S1
108.7
Pivot
110.7
R1
113.8
R2
115.8
R3
118.8
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in CHTR among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.