AutoZone is a retailer of automotive replacement parts, accessories and maintenance products in the United States, Mexico and Brazil. It sells to do-it-yourself customers through its stores and to repair shops through a commercial programme. The company earns money from retail sales of parts such as batteries, brakes and fluids, and demand tends to be supported by the age of vehicles on the road and the need for repairs.
Trailing twelve-month revenue stands at $20.0 billion, while revenue grew by 5.2% a year over the past three years. Return on invested capital is 48%, alongside an operating margin of 18.0%. Net debt is 2.1 times EBITDA. The company does not currently pay a dividend. On the X-Ray Score, it is rated 49 out of 100.
52-wk range $2,730.65 – $4,040.00Volume 208,379Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$55.1B
52-week range$2,730.65 – $4,040.00
Volume (last day)208,379
P/E (TTM)22.5
EBIT / EV yield5.6%
Free-cash-flow yield3.0%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$20.0B
Net income (TTM)$2.5B
Operating margin18.0%
Return on capital47.7%
Debt incl. leases$9.0B
Cash & securities$254M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$3,320middle half of models $3,091 – $3,471
Fair+1.5% to fair value
Average of the 12 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Low, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Consumer Discretionary peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
40/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield5.6%
Free-cash-flow yield3.0%
Fair value vs price1.0×
GrowthWeak
43/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)5.2%
EPS growth (3y)7.3%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityFair
63/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital47.7%
Operating margin18.0%
Gross profitability49.5%
Financial healthWeak
47/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score6 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA2.1×
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+2.4%Feb '25
+5.4%May '25
+0.6%Aug '25
+8.2%Nov '25
+8.1%Feb '26
+8.4%May '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $4.8B, diluted EPS $38.07.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare AZO with peers and sector
Medians of 46 Consumer Discretionary peers and of 46 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): AMZN42, TSLA28, HD40, MCD53, TJX55, BKNG70.
Metric
AZO
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
49
51
51
Valuation
40
49
49
Growth
43
53
53
Profitability
63
52
52
Financial health
46
50
50
Dividends
–
52
52
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Consumer Discretionary
AZO ranks #26 of 47 in Consumer Discretionary by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for AZO
Each factor is rated by where AZO stands among the 47 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 3 Good · 10 Average · 7 Bad of 20Growth: 0 · 2 · 1Profitability: 2 · 2 · 0Financial strength: 1 · 2 · 1Valuation: 0 · 3 · 1Cash flow: 0 · 0 · 4Efficiency: 0 · 1 · 0
Factor
AZO
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+5.2%
Averagebeats 37%
+6.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+2.4%
Badbeats 27%
+4.9%
+7.4%
▼ Worse
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+7.3%
Averagebeats 57%
+4.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
51.8%
Goodbeats 69%
42.5%
52.6%
≈ In line
Operating margin
18.0%
Averagebeats 66%
14.9%
20.1%
▼ Worse
Net margin
12.4%
Averagebeats 64%
11.4%
14.5%
▼ Worse
Return on invested capital
47.7%
Goodbeats 77%
24.6%
–
–
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
2.1x
Averagebeats 49%
1.8x
1.9x
≈ In line
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 76%
25.3x
10.9x
▲ Better
Current ratio
0.89
Badbeats 29%
1.10
0.84
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
6 / 9
Averagebeats 49%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
22.2x
Averagebeats 46%
21.1x
18.5x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
2.8x
Averagebeats 41%
2.1x
2.8x
≈ In line
EV / EBITDA
15.0x
Averagebeats 50%
15.0x
13.7x
≈ In line
Free cash flow yield
3.0%
Badbeats 22%
4.3%
4.6%
▼ Worse
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
8.2%
Badbeats 32%
10.8%
12.3%
▼ Worse
Cash from operations / net income
1.24
Badbeats 26%
1.37
1.25
≈ In line
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
−11.0%
Badbeats 16%
+12.1%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−2.8%
Badbeats 22%
−5.3%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
14 days
Averagebeats 50%
14 days
11 days
≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 3 Good · ● 8 Average · ● 5 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Bad
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginAverage
Gross profitabilityAverage
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 47/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$14.6B
$16.3B
$17.5B
$18.5B
$18.9B
Operating income
$2.9B
$3.3B
$3.5B
$3.8B
$3.6B
Net income
$2.2B
$2.4B
$2.5B
$2.7B
$2.5B
Operating cash flow
$3.5B
$3.2B
$2.9B
$3.0B
$3.1B
Operating margin
20.1%
20.1%
19.9%
20.5%
19.1%
Free cash flow
$2.9B
$2.5B
$2.1B
$1.9B
$1.8B
Diluted EPS
$95.19
$117.19
$132.36
$149.55
$144.87
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
12 bullish · 0 neutral · 4 bearish
Weekly
Bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 4 bearish
Monthly
Bearish
2 bullish · 1 neutral · 5 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
3,050.9
Bullish
EMA 10
3,081.8
Bullish
SMA 20
2,953.7
Bullish
EMA 20
3,007.2
Bullish
SMA 50
2,948.0
Bullish
EMA 50
2,979.0
Bullish
SMA 100
3,006.0
Bullish
EMA 100
3,050.8
Bullish
SMA 200
3,269.4
Bullish
EMA 200
3,208.4
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
73.10
Bearish
MACD (12, 26)
71.70
Bullish
Momentum (12)
12.84
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
98.77
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-1.23
Bearish
CCI (20)
176.4
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
3,081.3
S2
3,121.9
S1
3,196.3
Pivot
3,236.8
R1
3,311.3
R2
3,351.8
R3
3,426.3
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in AZO among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
AZO stock splits
AZO has split its stock 2 times since 1992. The latest was a 2-for-1 split on 21 Apr 1994.