Aptiv is an automotive technology supplier that develops the wiring, connectors, electronics and software that link vehicle systems together. Its products include electrical distribution systems, sensors and safety technology, and software for advanced driver assistance and in-vehicle computing. Customers are vehicle manufacturers around the world, to which it supplies components designed into new models.
Revenue comes from component and system contracts with automakers, which are supplied over the life of each vehicle programme. Revenue was $18.7 billion over the last twelve months, with growth of 5.3% a year across the last three years. The operating margin is 5.3%, and the business earns a profit of 5% on the capital invested in it. Net debt is 2.4 times EBITDA, and no dividend is paid. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 53 out of 100.
52-wk range $42.56 – $88.93Volume 3,860,289Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$9.3B
52-week range$42.56 – $88.93
Volume (last day)3,860,289
P/E (TTM)42.8
EBIT / EV yield7.2%
Free-cash-flow yield7.4%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$18.7B
Net income (TTM)$220M
Operating margin5.3%
Return on capital5.2%
Debt incl. leases$5.4B
Cash & securities$761M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$63middle half of models $56 – $71
Undervalued+43.3% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $44
Undervalued < $53Fair $53 – $76Overvalued > $76
P/E multiple
$44
P/B multiple
$71
P/S multiple
$78
EV/EBITDA multiple
$56
EV/EBIT multiple
$57
EV/revenue multiple
$78
10-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$67
5-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$63
10-year DCF, revenue exit
$69
5-year DCF, revenue exit
$66
10-year DCF, growth exit
$52
5-year DCF, growth exit
$44
Earnings power value
$71
Growth the price implies
12.3%/yr
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, but the price is low
Our models put fair value above today's price, but models can be wrong, so check the business first. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Consumer Discretionary peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationStrong
82/100
Cheap against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield7.2%
Free-cash-flow yield7.4%
Fair value vs price1.4×
GrowthWeak
40/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)5.3%
EPS growth (3y)-27.4%
Growth consistency50%
ProfitabilityWeak
32/100
Earns lower returns on its capital than most peers.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital5.2%
Operating margin5.3%
Gross profitability20.4%
Financial healthFair
58/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score8 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA2.4×
Interest cover3.0×
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
-1.6%Mar '25
-36.7%Jun '25
+7.4%Sep '25
+5.0%Dec '25
+5.4%Mar '26
+2.3%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $3.3B, diluted EPS $1.17.
SWOT analysis: Aptiv PLC
Strengthsinside the company
Free cash flow equals 7.4% of the market value, which funds dividends, buybacks or debt paydown.
Passes 8 of the 9 Piotroski tests, which points to improving profitability, funding and efficiency.
Weaknessesinside the company
Return on invested capital is only 5.2% (median 24.9% for sector peers), so the business earns little above its cost of capital.
Operating margin of 5.3% is thin against 15.0% for sector peers.
Earnings per share have declined 27.4% a year over three years.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
The price is 43% below our fair value estimate, with the gap larger than the margin we allow for error.
Threatsvaluation and setting
Trades at 42.2x earnings, 104% above the 20.7x median of sector peers, so the price already assumes better results.
The price trend is down on the daily and weekly signals.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare APTV with peers and sector
Medians of 46 Consumer Discretionary peers and of 46 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): AMZN42, TSLA28, HD40, MCD53, TJX55, BKNG70.
Metric
APTV
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
53
50
50
Valuation
82
48
48
Growth
40
53
53
Profitability
32
52
52
Financial health
58
49
49
Dividends
–
52
52
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Consumer Discretionary
APTV ranks #17 of 47 in Consumer Discretionary by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for APTV
Each factor is rated by where APTV stands among the 47 Consumer Discretionary stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 9 Good · 4 Average · 10 Bad of 23Growth: 0 · 2 · 1Profitability: 0 · 0 · 5Financial strength: 2 · 1 · 1Valuation: 4 · 0 · 1Cash flow: 2 · 1 · 1Efficiency: 1 · 0 · 1
Factor
APTV
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+5.3%
Averagebeats 39%
+6.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+3.5%
Averagebeats 38%
+4.9%
+12.0%
▼ Worse
EPS growth, 3 years a year
−27.4%
Badbeats 13%
+4.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
19.6%
Badbeats 11%
42.5%
17.2%
▲ Better
Operating margin
5.3%
Badbeats 14%
14.9%
7.6%
▼ Worse
Net margin
1.2%
Badbeats 8%
11.4%
3.8%
▼ Worse
Return on invested capital
5.2%
Badbeats 11%
24.6%
–
–
Return on equity
2.5%
Badbeats 7%
35.3%
7.1%
▼ Worse
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
2.4x
Averagebeats 40%
1.8x
2.5x
≈ In line
Interest cover
3.0x
Badbeats 6%
25.3x
5.5x
▼ Worse
Current ratio
2.02
Goodbeats 85%
1.10
1.72
▲ Better
Piotroski F-score
8 / 9
Goodbeats 92%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
42.2x
Badbeats 12%
21.1x
42.5x
≈ In line
Price / book
1.1x
Goodbeats 96%
7.2x
2.2x
▲ Better
Price / sales
0.5x
Goodbeats 93%
2.1x
1.3x
▲ Better
EV / EBITDA
7.2x
Goodbeats 92%
15.0x
12.1x
▲ Better
Free cash flow yield
7.4%
Goodbeats 69%
4.3%
3.9%
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
3.7%
Badbeats 14%
10.8%
4.9%
▼ Worse
Cash from operations / net income
6.14
Goodbeats 94%
1.37
2.07
▲ Better
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+54.0%
Goodbeats 93%
+12.1%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−6.3%
Averagebeats 60%
−5.3%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
7.4x
Goodbeats 76%
4.2x
6.9x
≈ In line
Days sales outstanding
47 days
Badbeats 7%
14 days
65 days
▲ Better
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 6 Good · ● 4 Average · ● 6 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashAverage
Free-cash-flow yieldGood
Risk models
Altman Z''Average
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Bad
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Good
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyBad
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverBad
Valuation
Fair value vs priceGood
EBIT / EV yieldGood
Profitability
Return on invested capitalBad
Operating marginBad
Gross profitabilityBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 48/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$15.6B
$17.5B
$20.1B
$19.7B
$20.4B
Operating income
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$1.2B
Net income
$590M
$594M
$2.9B
$1.8B
$165M
Operating cash flow
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.9B
$2.4B
$2.2B
Operating margin
7.6%
7.2%
7.8%
9.3%
5.8%
Free cash flow
$611M
$419M
$990M
$1.6B
$1.5B
Diluted EPS
$1.94
$1.96
$10.39
$6.96
$0.75
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Strongly bearish
0 bullish · 4 neutral · 12 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bearish
0 bullish · 1 neutral · 11 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bearish
0 bullish · 1 neutral · 7 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
44.32
Bearish
EMA 10
44.33
Bearish
SMA 20
44.13
Bearish
EMA 20
44.39
Bearish
SMA 50
45.24
Bearish
EMA 50
46.37
Bearish
SMA 100
52.61
Bearish
EMA 100
50.90
Bearish
SMA 200
60.97
Bearish
EMA 200
57.50
Bearish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
44.89
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-0.28
Bearish
Momentum (12)
-2.03
Bearish
Stochastic %K (14)
31.63
Neutral
Williams %R (14)
-68.37
Neutral
CCI (20)
-4.99
Neutral
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
41.99
S2
42.77
S1
43.29
Pivot
44.07
R1
44.58
R2
45.36
R3
45.88
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
0.00 USD
Yield on today's price
–
Frequency
None in the last year
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
0.2200
0.2200
0.2200
0.2200
0.2200
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in APTV among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.