Arista Networks designs and sells high-speed Ethernet switches and routers, along with the software that runs them. Its main customers are large cloud and internet companies, plus enterprises and service providers that build data center and campus networks. Revenue comes from hardware sales, which carry its Extensible Operating System, and from recurring software subscriptions and support services. Demand is closely tied to spending on data center capacity.
Revenue has grown 27.1% a year over three years, leaving the last twelve months at $10.5 billion. Operating margin is 43.1%. Return on invested capital comes to 253%. It does not pay a dividend. This gives an X-Ray Score of 62 out of 100. These numbers describe past results and current financial position, and they are shown for reference only.
52-wk range $114.52 – $217.41Volume 8,285,055Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$218.3B
52-week range$114.52 – $217.41
Volume (last day)8,285,055
P/E (TTM)409.2
EBIT / EV yield2.2%
Free-cash-flow yield2.4%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$10.5B
Net income (TTM)$533M
Operating margin43.1%
Return on capital253.4%
Debt incl. leasesData missing
Cash & securities$13.3B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$151middle half of models $139 – $194
Fair−11.8% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Information Technology peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
34/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield2.2%
Free-cash-flow yield2.4%
Fair value vs price0.9×
GrowthStrong
87/100
Growing faster than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)27.1%
EPS growth (3y)37.0%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityStrong
75/100
Earns high returns on the capital it uses.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital253.4%
Operating margin43.1%
Gross profitability28.0%
Financial healthFair
54/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score4 / 9
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+27.6%Mar '25
+30.4%Jun '25
+27.5%Sep '25
+28.9%Dec '25
+35.1%Mar '26
+37.7%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $3.0B, diluted EPS $0.95.
Other Communications Equipment companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Arista Networks, Inc.
Strengthsinside the company
Return on invested capital is 253.4%, against a median of 20.3% for industry peers.
Operating margin of 43.1% is well above the 24.3% median of industry peers, a sign of pricing power or lower costs.
Revenue has grown 27.1% a year over three years (median 8.6% for industry peers).
Earnings per share have compounded at 37.0% a year over three years.
Weaknessesinside the company
No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Our Market Compass rates the backdrop for Information Technology as favourable.
Threatsvaluation and setting
Trades at 409.4x earnings, 1,020% above the 36.5x median of industry peers, so the price already assumes better results.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare ANET with peers and sector
Medians of 5 Communications Equipment peers and of 74 Information Technology stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): CSCO42, MSI48, LITE35, CIEN40, FFIV55.
Metric
ANET
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
62
42
50
Valuation
34
40
52
Growth
87
52
54
Profitability
75
49
49
Financial health
54
44
49
Dividends
–
–
50
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Information Technology
ANET ranks #13 of 75 in Information Technology and #1 of 6 in Communications Equipment by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for ANET
Each factor is rated by where ANET stands among the 75 Information Technology stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 11 Good · 1 Average · 10 Bad of 22Growth: 3 · 0 · 0Profitability: 2 · 1 · 2Financial strength: 2 · 0 · 1Valuation: 0 · 0 · 5Cash flow: 4 · 0 · 0Efficiency: 0 · 0 · 2
Factor
ANET
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+27.1%
Goodbeats 90%
+9.7%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+28.6%
Goodbeats 85%
+13.7%
+28.6%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+37.0%
Goodbeats 89%
+5.9%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
63.0%
Averagebeats 58%
57.8%
63.8%
≈ In line
Operating margin
43.1%
Goodbeats 89%
20.3%
38.5%
▲ Better
Net margin
5.1%
Badbeats 14%
17.8%
0.0%
▲ Better
Return on invested capital
253.4%
Goodbeats 97%
19.4%
–
–
Return on equity
3.6%
Badbeats 9%
21.0%
0.0%
▲ Better
Financial strength
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 75%
23.0x
–
–
Current ratio
2.96
Goodbeats 83%
1.57
4.34
▼ Worse
Piotroski F-score
4 / 9
Badbeats 9%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
409.4x
Badbeats 5%
33.6x
41,697,641.6x
▲ Better
Price / book
14.8x
Badbeats 28%
8.3x
11.9x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
20.7x
Badbeats 7%
6.9x
15.7x
▼ Worse
EV / EBITDA
44.2x
Badbeats 23%
24.7x
–
–
Free cash flow yield
2.4%
Badbeats 32%
3.4%
2.6%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
48.9%
Goodbeats 95%
22.3%
34.1%
▲ Better
Cash from operations / net income
9.95
Goodbeats 97%
1.39
1,207,914.39
▼ Worse
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+111.7%
Goodbeats 94%
+15.4%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−20.1%
Goodbeats 98%
−4.4%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
1.5x
Badbeats 3%
3.9x
1.4x
≈ In line
Days sales outstanding
78 days
Badbeats 27%
63 days
64 days
▼ Worse
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 10 Good · ● 2 Average · ● 3 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Good
Piotroski F-ScoreBad
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Good
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Good
Revenue growth (3y)Good
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginGood
Gross profitabilityAverage
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 69/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$2.9B
$4.4B
$5.9B
$7.0B
$9.0B
Operating income
$925M
$1.5B
$2.3B
$2.9B
$3.9B
Net income
$841
$1,352
$2,087
$2,852
$3,511
Operating cash flow
$1.0B
$493M
$2.0B
$3.7B
$4.4B
Operating margin
31.4%
34.9%
38.5%
42.0%
42.8%
Free cash flow
$951M
$448M
$2.0B
$3.7B
$4.3B
Diluted EPS
$2.63
$1.07
$1.65
$2.23
$2.75
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bearish
5 bullish · 1 neutral · 10 bearish
Weekly
Neutral
6 bullish · 1 neutral · 5 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
191.0
Bearish
EMA 10
187.6
Bearish
SMA 20
199.4
Bearish
EMA 20
193.7
Bearish
SMA 50
197.0
Bearish
EMA 50
193.8
Bearish
SMA 100
184.9
Bearish
EMA 100
185.0
Bearish
SMA 200
163.6
Bullish
EMA 200
169.4
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
32.41
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-5.42
Bearish
Momentum (12)
-20.57
Bearish
Stochastic %K (14)
2.52
Bullish
Williams %R (14)
-97.48
Bullish
CCI (20)
-153.2
Bullish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
158.9
S2
164.4
S1
167.7
Pivot
173.2
R1
176.6
R2
182.1
R3
185.4
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in ANET among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
ANET stock splits
ANET has split its stock 2 times since 2021. The latest was a 4-for-1 split on 4 Dec 2024.