Autodesk develops design and engineering software used in architecture, construction, manufacturing, media and entertainment. Well known products include AutoCAD, Revit, Maya and Fusion. The company sells mostly through subscriptions, delivered both on desktop and in the cloud, to customers ranging from individual designers to large engineering firms, often through resellers and distributors. Its tools are used throughout the design process, from early concepts to final production.
Revenue at Autodesk, Inc. was $7.8 billion across the last twelve months. Across three years, sales expanded by 12.9% a year. Operating profit was 26.2% of revenue. It earned a return on invested capital of 58%. Net debt to EBITDA is -0.3 times, which means the company holds more cash than debt. There is no dividend. On the site's X-Ray Score, it rates 67 out of 100.
52-wk range $185.50 – $320.00Volume 2,163,948Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$53.8B
52-week range$185.50 – $320.00
Volume (last day)2,163,948
P/E (TTM)33.1
EBIT / EV yield3.8%
Free-cash-flow yield5.3%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$7.8B
Net income (TTM)$1.6B
Operating margin26.2%
Return on capital58.5%
Debt incl. leases$3.5B
Cash & securities$4.2B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$276middle half of models $283 – $324
Fair+8.2% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is High, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Information Technology peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationStrong
70/100
Cheap against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield3.8%
Free-cash-flow yield5.3%
Fair value vs price1.1×
GrowthFair
60/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)12.9%
EPS growth (3y)11.4%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityStrong
74/100
Earns high returns on the capital it uses.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital58.5%
Operating margin26.2%
Gross profitability54.7%
Financial healthFair
62/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score8 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA-0.3×
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+15.2%Apr '25
+17.1%Jul '25
+18.0%Oct '25
+19.4%Jan '26
+18.4%Apr '26
+16.1%Jul '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $2.0B, diluted EPS $2.33.
Other Application Software companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Autodesk, Inc.
Strengthsinside the company
Return on invested capital is 58.5%, against a median of 19.7% for industry peers.
Revenue has grown 12.9% a year over three years (median 12.3% for industry peers).
Free cash flow equals 5.3% of the market value, which funds dividends, buybacks or debt paydown.
Cash exceeds debt (net debt is negative), which gives room to invest or ride out a downturn.
Weaknessesinside the company
Altman Z-score of 0.6 is in the zone linked with financial distress in past studies.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Revenue growth picked up to 17.5% last year from 12.9% a year over three years.
Our Market Compass rates the backdrop for Information Technology as favourable.
Threatsvaluation and setting
Valuation uncertainty is high: the models give widely different values, so the fair value range is wide.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare ADSK with peers and sector
Medians of 13 Application Software peers and of 74 Information Technology stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): PLTR63, ORCL56, CRM52, ADBE77, INTU71, DDOG50.
Metric
ADSK
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
67
57
50
Valuation
70
60
50
Growth
60
65
54
Profitability
74
61
49
Financial health
62
47
49
Dividends
–
72
50
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Information Technology
ADSK ranks #8 of 75 in Information Technology and #4 of 14 in Application Software by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for ADSK
Each factor is rated by where ADSK stands among the 75 Information Technology stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 11 Good · 9 Average · 2 Bad of 22Growth: 0 · 3 · 0Profitability: 3 · 2 · 0Financial strength: 3 · 0 · 1Valuation: 1 · 3 · 1Cash flow: 3 · 1 · 0Efficiency: 1 · 0 · 0
Factor
ADSK
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+12.9%
Averagebeats 64%
+9.7%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+17.5%
Averagebeats 63%
+13.7%
+14.1%
▲ Better
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+11.4%
Averagebeats 61%
+5.9%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
91.2%
Goodbeats 99%
57.8%
90.6%
≈ In line
Operating margin
26.2%
Averagebeats 59%
20.3%
20.5%
▲ Better
Net margin
21.1%
Averagebeats 61%
17.8%
16.4%
▲ Better
Return on invested capital
58.5%
Goodbeats 85%
19.4%
–
–
Return on equity
48.5%
Goodbeats 79%
21.0%
48.8%
≈ In line
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
-0.3x
Goodbeats 86%
0.8x
0.2x
▲ Better
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 75%
23.0x
17.5x
▲ Better
Current ratio
0.86
Badbeats 14%
1.57
0.82
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
8 / 9
Goodbeats 89%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
32.8x
Averagebeats 52%
33.6x
60.5x
▲ Better
Price / book
15.9x
Badbeats 21%
8.3x
29.6x
▲ Better
Price / sales
6.9x
Averagebeats 50%
6.9x
10.0x
▲ Better
EV / EBITDA
23.7x
Averagebeats 54%
24.7x
43.3x
▲ Better
Free cash flow yield
5.3%
Goodbeats 75%
3.4%
2.7%
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
36.4%
Goodbeats 85%
22.3%
33.4%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
1.76
Goodbeats 69%
1.39
2.18
▼ Worse
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+5.9%
Averagebeats 34%
+15.4%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−9.7%
Goodbeats 82%
−4.4%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
32 days
Goodbeats 87%
63 days
60 days
▲ Better
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 9 Good · ● 5 Average · ● 2 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Free-cash-flow yieldGood
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDAGood
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceGood
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginAverage
Gross profitabilityGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 67/100.
Financials
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
Revenue
$4.4B
$5.0B
$5.5B
$6.1B
$7.2B
Operating income
$618M
$989M
$1.1B
$1.4B
$1.6B
Net income
$497M
$823M
$906M
$1.1B
$1.1B
Operating cash flow
$1.5B
$2.1B
$1.3B
$1.6B
$2.5B
Operating margin
14.1%
19.8%
20.5%
22.1%
21.9%
Free cash flow
$1.5B
$2.0B
$1.3B
$1.6B
$2.4B
Diluted EPS
$2.24
$3.78
$4.19
$5.12
$5.23
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Strongly bullish
12 bullish · 1 neutral · 3 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
9 bullish · 1 neutral · 2 bearish
Monthly
Neutral
4 bullish · 1 neutral · 3 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
240.2
Bullish
EMA 10
240.9
Bullish
SMA 20
228.8
Bullish
EMA 20
234.6
Bullish
SMA 50
232.9
Bullish
EMA 50
230.7
Bullish
SMA 100
224.8
Bullish
EMA 100
231.4
Bullish
SMA 200
234.8
Bullish
EMA 200
240.1
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
68.56
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
6.21
Bullish
Momentum (12)
10.23
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
96.80
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-3.20
Bearish
CCI (20)
128.9
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
239.8
S2
243.3
S1
249.1
Pivot
252.6
R1
258.5
R2
262.0
R3
267.8
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in ADSK among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
ADSK stock splits
ADSK has split its stock 3 times since 1994. The latest was a 2-for-1 split on 21 Dec 2004.