Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)
Industrials · Electrical Components & Equipment · US stock · S&P 500 component
$195.59
▼ -16.56 (7.81%)
Fair valueFair
$171 −12.8% to fair value
$85fair band $145–$207$256
Day's range
$193.14 – $204.00
52-week range
$147.82 – $379.94
About Vertiv Holdings Co
Vertiv makes critical digital infrastructure equipment, with a focus on data centers, communication networks and industrial sites. Its products include power management systems, thermal and cooling equipment, racks and monitoring software, along with installation and maintenance services. Revenue comes from selling this equipment to cloud operators, colocation providers and enterprises, and from recurring service contracts that keep the systems running reliably across their working life.
Trailing twelve-month revenue stands at $11.5 billion. The three-year revenue growth rate is 21.6% a year. Profitability shows an operating margin of 18.9% and a return on invested capital of 36%. Net debt stands at 0.1 times EBITDA. Shareholders receive a dividend, yielding 0.1%. This gives an X-Ray Score of 58 out of 100. These figures describe past results as reported and are a factual snapshot, not a forecast. Some measures, such as margins for real estate trusts and banks, are defined differently from those of industrial firms, so comparisons should be made with care.
Price chart
52-wk range $147.82 – $379.94Volume 8,412,387Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$76.8B
52-week range$147.82 – $379.94
Volume (last day)8,412,387
P/E (TTM)44.2
EBIT / EV yield2.8%
Free-cash-flow yield3.8%
Dividend yield0.1%
Revenue (TTM)$11.5B
Net income (TTM)$1.7B
Operating margin18.9%
Return on capital36.5%
Debt incl. leases$2.9B
Cash & securities$2.8B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$171middle half of models $152 – $206
Fair
−12.8% to fair value
Average of the 12 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is High, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Peak-cycle earnings: the current operating margin is more than 1.5x its 7-year average, so multiples applied to today's profit may overstate value; model uncertainty is set to High
Price $196
Undervalued < $145Fair $145 – $207Overvalued > $207
P/E multiple
$206
P/B multiple
$155
P/S multiple
$144
EV/EBITDA multiple
$186
EV/EBIT multiple
$190
EV/revenue multiple
$161
10-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$207
5-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$226
10-year DCF, revenue exit
$198
5-year DCF, revenue exit
$211
10-year DCF, growth exit
$85
5-year DCF, growth exit
$78
Dividend discount, stable · not used
$12
Dividend discount, multi-stage · not used
$12
Earnings power value · not used
$71
Growth the price implies
26.4%/yr
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Industrials peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
Valuation
Weak
30/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield2.8%
Free-cash-flow yield3.8%
Fair value vs price0.9×
Growth
Strong
91/100
Growing faster than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)21.6%
Growth consistency100%
Profitability
Fair
68/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital36.5%
Operating margin18.9%
Gross profitability27.5%
Financial health
Weak
49/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score5 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA0.1×
Interest cover41.4×
Dividends
Fair
59/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield0.1%
Dividends vs free cash flow3%
Dividend growth159.8%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+24.2%
Mar '25
+35.1%
Jun '25
+29.0%
Sep '25
+22.7%
Dec '25
+30.1%
Mar '26
+24.1%
Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $3.3B, diluted EPS $1.27.
Compare with peers
EMR Emerson Electric Co49 AME Ametek Inc/48 ROK Rockwell Automation, I...47 ETN Eaton Corp plc41Other Electrical Components & Equipment companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Vertiv Holdings Co
Strengthsinside the company
- Return on invested capital is 36.5%, against a median of 11.0% for industry peers.
- Revenue has grown 21.6% a year over three years (median 9.8% for industry peers).
- Net debt is only 0.1x EBITDA.
- Operating profit covers interest 41x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Weaknessesinside the company
- No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
- Revenue growth picked up to 27.7% last year from 21.6% a year over three years.
Threatsvaluation and setting
- Valuation uncertainty is high: the models give widely different values, so the fair value range is wide.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare VRT with peers and sector
Medians of 5 Electrical Components & Equipment peers and of 80 Industrials stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): ETN 41, EMR 49, BE 32, AME 48, ROK 47.
| Metric | VRT | Peers | Sector |
|---|---|---|---|
| X-Ray Score (out of 100) | 58 | 47 | 50 |
| Valuation | 30 | 26 | 48 |
| Growth | 91 | 73 | 50 |
| Profitability | 68 | 35 | 50 |
| Financial health | 49 | 58 | 49 |
| Dividends | 59 | 43 | 53 |
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Industrials
VRT ranks #20 of 81 in Industrials and #1 of 6 in Electrical Components & Equipment by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for VRT
Each factor is rated by where VRT stands among the 81 Industrials stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 8 Good · 6 Average · 7 Bad of 21
Growth: 2 · 0 · 0
Profitability: 2 · 3 · 0
Financial strength: 1 · 2 · 1
Valuation: 0 · 1 · 4
Cash flow: 3 · 0 · 0
Efficiency: 0 · 0 · 2
| Factor | VRT | Rating | Sector median | Own 5-year median | Against own history |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth | |||||
| Revenue growth, 3 years a year | +21.6% | Good beats 97% | +5.6% | – | – |
| Revenue growth, last year | +27.7% | Good beats 96% | +4.5% | +16.7% | ▲ Better |
| Profitability | |||||
| Gross margin | 38.0% | Average beats 50% | 38.0% | 35.0% | ≈ In line |
| Operating margin | 18.9% | Average beats 65% | 17.5% | 12.7% | ▲ Better |
| Net margin | 15.1% | Average beats 65% | 12.8% | 6.2% | ▲ Better |
| Return on invested capital | 36.5% | Good beats 90% | 14.9% | – | – |
| Return on equity | 36.4% | Good beats 75% | 23.7% | 20.4% | ▲ Better |
| Financial strength | |||||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.1x | Good beats 93% | 1.8x | 1.9x | ▲ Better |
| Interest cover | 41.4x | Average beats 56% | 21.4x | 4.8x | ▲ Better |
| Current ratio | 1.38 | Average beats 58% | 1.25 | 1.65 | ▼ Worse |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 / 9 | Bad beats 16% | 6 / 9 | – | – |
| Valuation | |||||
| P/E ratio | 44.4x | Bad beats 10% | 28.9x | 67.4x | ▲ Better |
| Price / book | 16.1x | Bad beats 12% | 6.2x | 9.2x | ▼ Worse |
| Price / sales | 6.7x | Bad beats 13% | 3.5x | 2.7x | ▼ Worse |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.0x | Bad beats 8% | 18.5x | 23.7x | ▼ Worse |
| Free cash flow yield | 3.8% | Average beats 48% | 3.8% | 2.6% | ▲ Better |
| Cash flow | |||||
| Free cash flow margin | 25.5% | Good beats 90% | 13.8% | 11.3% | ▲ Better |
| Cash from operations / net income | 1.94 | Good beats 79% | 1.39 | 1.76 | ≈ In line |
| Accruals (lower is better) | −10.2% | Good beats 96% | −3.2% | – | – |
| Efficiency | |||||
| Inventory turnover | 2.8x | Bad beats 21% | 4.0x | 5.0x | ▼ Worse |
| Days sales outstanding | 119 days | Bad beats 1% | 57 days | 112 days | ≈ In line |
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 5 Good · ● 6 Average · ● 3 BadCash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Free-cash-flow yieldAverage
Risk models
Altman Z''Average
Piotroski F-ScoreBad
Growth
Revenue growth (3y)Good
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioAverage
Net debt / EBITDAGood
Interest coverAverage
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginAverage
Gross profitabilityAverage
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 65/100.
Financials
| FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.0B | $5.7B | $6.9B | $8.0B | $10.2B |
| Operating income | $260M | $223M | $872M | $1.4B | $1.8B |
| Net income | $120M | $77M | $460M | $496M | $1.3B |
| Operating cash flow | $211M | −$153M | $901M | $1.3B | $2.1B |
| Operating margin | 5.2% | 3.9% | 12.7% | 17.1% | 17.9% |
| Free cash flow | $138M | −$253M | $773M | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| Diluted EPS | $0.33 | $-0.04 | $1.19 | $1.28 | $3.41 |
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bearish
4 bullish · 0 neutral · 12 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bearish
2 bullish · 1 neutral · 9 bearish
Monthly
Neutral
3 bullish · 1 neutral · 4 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
| SMA 10 | 218.1 | Bearish |
| EMA 10 | 215.7 | Bearish |
| SMA 20 | 233.2 | Bearish |
| EMA 20 | 227.4 | Bearish |
| SMA 50 | 249.5 | Bearish |
| EMA 50 | 246.3 | Bearish |
| SMA 100 | 273.9 | Bearish |
| EMA 100 | 259.9 | Bearish |
| SMA 200 | 268.9 | Bearish |
| EMA 200 | 252.1 | Bearish |
Oscillators (daily)
| RSI (14) | 27.98 | Bullish |
| MACD (12, 26) | -13.64 | Bearish |
| Momentum (12) | -22.73 | Bearish |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 3.77 | Bullish |
| Williams %R (14) | -96.23 | Bullish |
| CCI (20) | -145.2 | Bullish |
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3 180.3 | S2 186.7 | S1 191.2 | Pivot 197.6 | R1 202.0 | R2 208.4 | R3 212.9 |
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
0.25 USD
Yield on today's price
0.13%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
| Ex-dividend date | Amount per share |
|---|---|
| 0.0630 | |
| 0.0630 | |
| 0.0630 | |
| 0.0630 | |
| 0.0380 | |
| 0.0380 | |
| 0.0380 | |
| 0.0380 | |
| 0.0250 | |
| 0.0250 | |
| 0.0250 | |
| 0.0250 |
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
ETFs that hold VRT
| ETF | Share of the fund |
|---|---|
| AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure | 7.24% |
| AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Su... | 3.74% |
| VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth | 2.83% |
| XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR | 2.23% |
| CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology | 1.73% |
| RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth | 1.72% |
| WTAI WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and... | 1.66% |
| VIS Vanguard Industrials | 1.63% |
The eight funds with the largest weight in VRT among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
VRT SEC filings
8-KSEC EDGAR
Regulation FD disclosure
8-KSEC EDGAR
Other events
8-KSEC EDGAR
Entered a material agreement; Regulation FD disclosure
10-QSEC EDGAR
Quarterly report
8-KSEC EDGAR
Results of operations; Regulation FD disclosure
8-KSEC EDGAR
Shareholder vote results
8-KSEC EDGAR
Regulation FD disclosure
8-KSEC EDGAR
Other events
Where the numbers come from
Statements SEC EDGAR filings (10-K, 10-Q), quarters derived from year-to-date figures.
Prices end-of-day closes, split-adjusted.
Industry inputs beta, multiples and equity risk premium from Damodaran Online (NYU Stern).
StocksXray is for education only and is not financial advice. Scores and fair values are model estimates from public filings and carry uncertainty.