Veeva Systems provides cloud software and data services built specifically for the life sciences industry, serving pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies. Its products help customers manage clinical trials, regulatory submissions, quality processes, and the commercial side of selling medicines to doctors. Revenue is largely recurring, coming from subscriptions to its software applications and from related data and professional services. Customers are typically regulated businesses that rely on these systems for core operations.
The figures show revenue of $3.5 billion for the last twelve months and three-year growth of 14.0% a year. It reports an operating margin of 29.9%. Capital is used to generate a return on invested capital of 233%. It does not currently pay a dividend. The site's X-Ray Score for the company is 61 out of 100.
52-wk range $148.05 – $325.96Volume 1,435,403Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$53.2B
52-week range$148.05 – $325.96
Volume (last day)1,435,403
P/E (TTM)53.0
EBIT / EV yield2.2%
Free-cash-flow yield–
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$3.5B
Net income (TTM)$1.0B
Operating margin29.9%
Return on capital232.6%
Debt incl. leasesData missing
Cash & securities$7.2B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$275middle half of models $256 – $327
Fair−14.7% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Strong business at a fair price
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Health Care peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
19/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield2.2%
Fair value vs price0.9×
GrowthStrong
82/100
Growing faster than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)14.0%
EPS growth (3y)21.9%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityStrong
72/100
Earns high returns on the capital it uses.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital232.6%
Operating margin29.9%
Gross profitability28.6%
Financial healthStrong
81/100
Balance sheet looks strong: debt is well covered.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score7 / 9
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+16.7%Apr '25
+16.7%Jul '25
+16.0%Oct '25
+16.0%Jan '26
+16.3%Apr '26
+17.6%Jul '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $928M, diluted EPS $1.66.
Other Health Care Technology companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Veeva Systems Inc
Strengthsinside the company
Return on invested capital is 232.6%, against a median of 11.8% for sector peers.
Operating margin of 29.9% is well above the 15.8% median of sector peers, a sign of pricing power or lower costs.
Revenue has grown 14.0% a year over three years (median 5.5% for sector peers).
Earnings per share have compounded at 21.9% a year over three years.
Weaknessesinside the company
No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
Trades at 52.5x earnings, 87% above the 28.0x median of sector peers, so the price already assumes better results.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare VEEV with peers and sector
Medians of 59 Health Care peers and of 59 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): LLY62, JNJ49, ABBV41, UNH58, MRK33, TMO34.
Metric
VEEV
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
61
49
49
Valuation
19
55
55
Growth
82
47
47
Profitability
72
49
49
Financial health
81
48
48
Dividends
–
51
51
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Health Care
VEEV ranks #15 of 60 in Health Care by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for VEEV
Each factor is rated by where VEEV stands among the 60 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 12 Good · 3 Average · 4 Bad of 19Growth: 3 · 0 · 0Profitability: 4 · 1 · 0Financial strength: 2 · 1 · 0Valuation: 0 · 0 · 4Cash flow: 2 · 1 · 0Efficiency: 1 · 0 · 0
Factor
VEEV
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+14.0%
Goodbeats 88%
+5.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+16.3%
Goodbeats 89%
+7.1%
+16.3%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+21.9%
Goodbeats 79%
+5.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
75.0%
Goodbeats 83%
65.0%
72.8%
≈ In line
Operating margin
29.9%
Goodbeats 86%
16.4%
25.2%
▲ Better
Net margin
29.3%
Goodbeats 96%
11.1%
23.1%
▲ Better
Return on invested capital
232.6%
Goodbeats 98%
12.2%
–
–
Return on equity
13.7%
Averagebeats 52%
13.7%
12.6%
≈ In line
Financial strength
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 82%
9.4x
–
–
Current ratio
5.46
Goodbeats 99%
1.52
4.24
▲ Better
Piotroski F-score
7 / 9
Averagebeats 62%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
52.5x
Badbeats 12%
28.2x
56.8x
≈ In line
Price / book
7.2x
Badbeats 30%
3.7x
7.3x
≈ In line
Price / sales
15.4x
Badbeats 3%
3.7x
14.0x
≈ In line
EV / EBITDA
44.6x
Badbeats 8%
17.6x
–
–
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
48.2%
Goodbeats 99%
16.3%
39.7%
▲ Better
Cash from operations / net income
1.64
Averagebeats 56%
1.61
1.60
≈ In line
Accruals (lower is better)
−7.2%
Goodbeats 79%
−3.9%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
52 days
Goodbeats 77%
62 days
132 days
▲ Better
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 9 Good · ● 2 Average · ● 2 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Risk models
Altman Z''Good
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Good
Revenue growth (3y)Good
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginGood
Gross profitabilityAverage
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 70/100.
Financials
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
Revenue
$1.9B
$2.2B
$2.4B
$2.7B
$3.2B
Operating income
$505M
$459M
$429M
$691M
$916M
Net income
$427M
$488M
$526M
$714M
$909M
Operating cash flow
$764M
$780M
$911M
$1.1B
$1.4B
Operating margin
27.3%
21.3%
18.2%
25.2%
28.7%
Free cash flow
–
–
–
–
–
Diluted EPS
$2.63
$3.00
$3.22
$4.32
$5.44
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
12 bullish · 0 neutral · 4 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 0 neutral · 1 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
309.3
Bullish
EMA 10
309.8
Bullish
SMA 20
295.4
Bullish
EMA 20
298.4
Bullish
SMA 50
275.5
Bullish
EMA 50
273.8
Bullish
SMA 100
231.4
Bullish
EMA 100
247.4
Bullish
SMA 200
206.8
Bullish
EMA 200
230.9
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
75.97
Bearish
MACD (12, 26)
14.27
Bullish
Momentum (12)
13.77
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
93.44
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-6.56
Bearish
CCI (20)
131.6
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
310.5
S2
314.3
S1
318.4
Pivot
322.2
R1
326.3
R2
330.1
R3
334.3
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in VEEV among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.