STERIS provides products and services that support infection prevention, sterilization and surgical care. It makes sterilizers, surgical tables and lights, and endoscopy accessories, and it offers sterile processing and reprocessing services to hospitals, drug makers and other customers. Revenue comes from equipment sales, consumable supplies such as cleaning and sterilizing agents, and recurring service contracts, which add a measure of steadiness to results.
Revenue has grown 9.4% a year over three years, leaving the last twelve months at $6.0 billion. Operating margin is 18.9%. Return on invested capital comes to 10%. On leverage, net debt to EBITDA is 0.9 times. A dividend is paid, with a yield of 1.1%. This gives an X-Ray Score of 63 out of 100.
52-wk range $195.14 – $269.44Volume 1,024,626Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$22.7B
52-week range$195.14 – $269.44
Volume (last day)1,024,626
P/E (TTM)28.4
EBIT / EV yield4.7%
Free-cash-flow yield4.1%
Dividend yield1.1%
Revenue (TTM)$6.0B
Net income (TTM)$805M
Operating margin18.9%
Return on capital9.8%
Debt incl. leases$1.9B
Cash & securities$482M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$239middle half of models $217 – $274
Fair+3.1% to fair value
Average of the 15 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Health Care peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationFair
55/100
Priced about in line with its sector.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield4.7%
Free-cash-flow yield4.1%
Fair value vs price1.0×
GrowthStrong
77/100
Growing faster than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)9.4%
EPS growth (3y)95.0%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityWeak
49/100
Earns lower returns on its capital than most peers.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital9.8%
Operating margin18.9%
Gross profitability25.0%
Financial healthStrong
78/100
Balance sheet looks strong: debt is well covered.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score9 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA0.9×
Interest cover18.8×
DividendsFair
62/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield1.1%
Dividends vs free cash flow27%
Dividend growth9.6%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+4.3%Mar '25
+8.7%Jun '25
+9.9%Sep '25
+9.2%Dec '25
+7.3%Mar '26
+7.3%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $1.5B.
Other Health Care Equipment companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: STERIS plc
Strengthsinside the company
Earnings per share have compounded at 95.0% a year over three years.
Operating profit covers interest 19x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Passes 9 of the 9 Piotroski tests, which points to improving profitability, funding and efficiency.
Weaknessesinside the company
No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Dividends use only 27% of free cash flow, which leaves room to raise them.
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
No specific threat is flagged by our checks; general market and interest-rate risk still applies.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare STE with peers and sector
Medians of 15 Health Care Equipment peers and of 59 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): ABT41, ISRG62, MDT57, SYK56, BSX67, BDX47.
Metric
STE
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
63
56
49
Valuation
55
60
52
Growth
77
66
47
Profitability
49
55
51
Financial health
78
55
48
Dividends
62
35
50
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Health Care
STE ranks #12 of 60 in Health Care and #6 of 16 in Health Care Equipment by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for STE
Each factor is rated by where STE stands among the 60 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 8 Good · 14 Average · 1 Bad of 23Growth: 2 · 1 · 0Profitability: 0 · 4 · 1Financial strength: 3 · 1 · 0Valuation: 0 · 5 · 0Cash flow: 2 · 2 · 0Efficiency: 1 · 1 · 0
Factor
STE
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+9.4%
Goodbeats 69%
+5.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+8.7%
Averagebeats 61%
+7.1%
+8.7%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+95.0%
Goodbeats 97%
+5.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
44.4%
Badbeats 27%
65.0%
44.0%
≈ In line
Operating margin
18.9%
Averagebeats 57%
16.4%
16.3%
▲ Better
Net margin
13.3%
Averagebeats 53%
11.1%
7.4%
▲ Better
Return on invested capital
9.8%
Averagebeats 39%
12.2%
–
–
Return on equity
11.2%
Averagebeats 39%
13.7%
6.0%
▲ Better
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
0.9x
Goodbeats 74%
2.0x
2.1x
▲ Better
Interest cover
18.8x
Averagebeats 64%
9.4x
7.3x
▲ Better
Current ratio
1.91
Goodbeats 71%
1.52
2.09
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
9 / 9
Goodbeats 99%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
28.2x
Averagebeats 50%
28.2x
59.1x
▲ Better
Price / book
3.2x
Averagebeats 57%
3.7x
3.4x
≈ In line
Price / sales
3.8x
Averagebeats 49%
3.7x
4.2x
▲ Better
EV / EBITDA
14.8x
Averagebeats 66%
17.6x
18.1x
▲ Better
Free cash flow yield
4.1%
Averagebeats 39%
4.4%
2.7%
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
15.3%
Averagebeats 43%
16.3%
11.9%
▲ Better
Cash from operations / net income
1.60
Averagebeats 48%
1.61
2.57
▼ Worse
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+35.0%
Goodbeats 85%
+4.3%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−4.5%
Goodbeats 67%
−3.9%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
4.7x
Goodbeats 76%
2.9x
4.3x
≈ In line
Days sales outstanding
61 days
Averagebeats 55%
62 days
70 days
▲ Better
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 7 Good · ● 8 Average · ● 1 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashAverage
Free-cash-flow yieldAverage
Risk models
Altman Z''Average
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Good
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Good
Revenue growth (3y)Good
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Net debt / EBITDAGood
Interest coverAverage
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginAverage
Gross profitabilityBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 63/100.
Financials
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
Revenue
$4.2B
$4.5B
$5.1B
$5.5B
$5.9B
Operating income
$478M
$791M
$836M
$867M
$1.1B
Net income
$244M
$107M
$378M
$615M
$782M
Operating cash flow
$685M
$757M
$973M
$1.1B
$1.3B
Operating margin
11.3%
17.4%
16.3%
15.9%
18.6%
Free cash flow
$397M
$395M
$613M
$778M
$972M
Diluted EPS
$2.48
$1.07
$3.81
$6.20
$7.93
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Strongly bullish
12 bullish · 1 neutral · 3 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
10 bullish · 1 neutral · 1 bearish
Monthly
Bullish
5 bullish · 1 neutral · 2 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
221.6
Bullish
EMA 10
222.0
Bullish
SMA 20
215.7
Bullish
EMA 20
218.8
Bullish
SMA 50
220.1
Bullish
EMA 50
218.4
Bullish
SMA 100
218.0
Bullish
EMA 100
219.7
Bullish
SMA 200
224.6
Bullish
EMA 200
223.3
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
68.70
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
2.76
Bullish
Momentum (12)
11.30
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
99.60
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-0.40
Bearish
CCI (20)
152.6
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
216.3
S2
219.6
S1
225.9
Pivot
229.1
R1
235.4
R2
238.7
R3
245.0
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
2.58 USD
Yield on today's price
1.11%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
0.6900
0.6300
0.6300
0.6300
0.6300
0.5700
0.5700
0.5700
0.5700
0.5200
0.5200
0.5200
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in STE among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
STE stock splits
STE has split its stock 2 times since 1995. The latest was a 2-for-1 split on 25 Aug 1998.