Solventum is a health care company that supplies products and software to hospitals, clinics, dental practices and health systems. Its portfolio covers wound care and surgical supplies, infection prevention, dental and orthodontic products, and software that helps providers manage clinical information and billing. It was spun out of its former parent company and operates through segments built around medical and surgical products, dental solutions and health information systems.
Revenue comes from the products and software that health care providers order, along with service and support. Sales were $8.3 billion over the last twelve months, with growth of 0.8% a year across the last three years. The operating margin is 25.0%, and the business earns a profit of 19% on the capital invested in it. Net debt is 1.8 times EBITDA, and no dividend is paid. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 48 out of 100.
52-wk range $62.38 – $94.16Volume 769,723Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$15.2B
52-week range$62.38 – $94.16
Volume (last day)769,723
P/E (TTM)10.7
EBIT / EV yield10.5%
Free-cash-flow yield-0.8%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$8.3B
Net income (TTM)$1.4B
Operating margin25.0%
Return on capital18.5%
Debt incl. leases$5.1B
Cash & securities$403M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$112middle half of models $90 – $123
Undervalued+28.5% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $87
Undervalued < $96Fair $96 – $136Overvalued > $136
P/E multiple
$86
P/B multiple
$86
P/S multiple
$85
EV/EBITDA multiple
$119
EV/EBIT multiple
$147
EV/revenue multiple
$90
10-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$116
5-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$106
10-year DCF, revenue exit
$114
5-year DCF, revenue exit
$103
10-year DCF, growth exit
$129
5-year DCF, growth exit
$123
Earnings power value
$157
Growth the price implies
0.3%/yr
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, but the price is low
Our models put fair value above today's price, but models can be wrong, so check the business first. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Health Care peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationFair
67/100
Priced about in line with its sector.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield10.5%
Free-cash-flow yield-0.8%
Fair value vs price1.3×
GrowthWeak
27/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)0.8%
EPS growth (3y)4.5%
Growth consistency80%
ProfitabilityWeak
47/100
Earns lower returns on its capital than most peers.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital18.5%
Operating margin25.0%
Gross profitability31.9%
Financial healthWeak
48/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score6 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.8×
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+2.7%Mar '25
+3.8%Jun '25
+0.7%Sep '25
-3.7%Dec '25
-3.0%Mar '26
+2.2%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $2.2B, diluted EPS $0.53.
Other Health Care Technology companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Solventum Corp
Strengthsinside the company
Return on invested capital is 18.5%, against a median of 11.8% for sector peers.
Operating margin of 25.0% is well above the 15.8% median of sector peers, a sign of pricing power or lower costs.
Operating profit covers interest 50x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Weaknessesinside the company
Free cash flow is negative, so spending or debt has to be financed from outside.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Trades at 10.6x earnings, 63% below the 28.4x median of sector peers.
The price is 29% below our fair value estimate, with the gap larger than the margin we allow for error.
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
No specific threat is flagged by our checks; general market and interest-rate risk still applies.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare SOLV with peers and sector
Medians of 59 Health Care peers and of 59 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): LLY62, JNJ49, ABBV41, UNH58, MRK33, TMO34.
Metric
SOLV
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
48
49
49
Valuation
67
52
52
Growth
27
48
48
Profitability
47
51
51
Financial health
48
48
48
Dividends
–
51
51
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Health Care
SOLV ranks #32 of 60 in Health Care by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for SOLV
Each factor is rated by where SOLV stands among the 60 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 7 Good · 7 Average · 7 Bad of 21Growth: 0 · 1 · 2Profitability: 3 · 2 · 0Financial strength: 1 · 2 · 1Valuation: 3 · 1 · 1Cash flow: 0 · 0 · 3Efficiency: 0 · 1 · 0
Factor
SOLV
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+0.8%
Badbeats 19%
+5.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+0.9%
Badbeats 13%
+7.1%
+0.8%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+4.5%
Averagebeats 49%
+5.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
54.7%
Averagebeats 35%
65.0%
56.4%
≈ In line
Operating margin
25.0%
Goodbeats 78%
16.4%
20.7%
▲ Better
Net margin
17.3%
Goodbeats 70%
11.1%
16.5%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
18.5%
Averagebeats 64%
12.2%
–
–
Return on equity
29.9%
Goodbeats 84%
13.7%
13.9%
▲ Better
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
1.8x
Averagebeats 58%
2.0x
1.6x
≈ In line
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 82%
9.4x
–
–
Current ratio
1.02
Badbeats 18%
1.52
1.23
▼ Worse
Piotroski F-score
6 / 9
Averagebeats 43%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
10.6x
Goodbeats 95%
28.2x
–
–
Price / book
3.2x
Averagebeats 55%
3.7x
–
–
Price / sales
1.8x
Goodbeats 73%
3.7x
–
–
EV / EBITDA
7.7x
Goodbeats 97%
17.6x
–
–
Free cash flow yield
-0.8%
Badbeats 3%
4.4%
–
–
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
-1.4%
Badbeats 3%
16.3%
13.7%
▼ Worse
Cash from operations / net income
0.15
Badbeats 1%
1.61
1.34
▼ Worse
Accruals (lower is better)
+8.6%
Badbeats 1%
−3.9%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
58 days
Averagebeats 66%
62 days
46 days
▼ Worse
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 4 Good · ● 5 Average · ● 6 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Bad
Growth consistencyBad
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceGood
EBIT / EV yieldGood
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginGood
Gross profitabilityAverage
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 48/100.
Financials
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$8.1B
$8.2B
$8.3B
$8.3B
Operating income
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.0B
$2.2B
Net income
$1.3B
$1.3B
$479M
$1.6B
Operating cash flow
$1.7B
$1.9B
$1.2B
$369M
Operating margin
20.8%
20.6%
12.6%
26.2%
Free cash flow
$1.4B
$1.6B
$805M
−$10M
Diluted EPS
$7.78
$7.79
$2.76
$8.88
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
10 bullish · 4 neutral · 2 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
8 bullish · 1 neutral · 1 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
4 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
86.54
Bullish
EMA 10
86.73
Bullish
SMA 20
87.24
Bullish
EMA 20
87.13
Bullish
SMA 50
88.59
Bearish
EMA 50
86.87
Bullish
SMA 100
84.23
Bullish
EMA 100
84.33
Bullish
SMA 200
78.37
Bullish
EMA 200
80.78
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
50.66
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-0.49
Bearish
Momentum (12)
0.47
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
67.53
Neutral
Williams %R (14)
-32.47
Neutral
CCI (20)
-0.47
Neutral
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
85.17
S2
85.80
S1
86.62
Pivot
87.25
R1
88.07
R2
88.70
R3
89.52
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in SOLV among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.