Mettler-Toledo makes precision instruments used to weigh, measure and analyse. Its range covers laboratory balances, pipettes and analytical instruments for research and quality control, industrial weighing and product inspection systems for factories and food producers, and retail weighing equipment. Customers include pharmaceutical and chemical companies, research laboratories, food producers and manufacturers. The group is organised mainly around geographic regions, with operations in Europe, Asia and North America.
The company earns money from instruments and from recurring service, consumables and software that customers need over the life of each device. Revenue was $4.1 billion over the last twelve months, with growth of 0.9% a year across the last three years. The operating margin is 28.2%, and the business earns a profit of 46% on the capital invested in it. Net debt is 1.8 times EBITDA, and no dividend is paid. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 47 out of 100.
52-wk range $1,023.05 – $1,713.39Volume 229,704Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$34.0B
52-week range$1,023.05 – $1,713.39
Volume (last day)229,704
P/E (TTM)38.0
EBIT / EV yield3.2%
Free-cash-flow yield2.5%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$4.1B
Net income (TTM)$906M
Operating margin28.2%
Return on capital46.4%
Debt incl. leases$2.1B
Cash & securities$51M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$1,362middle half of models $971 – $1,588
Overvalued−19.2% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, priced high
Our models put fair value below today's price, so a lot of good news may already be in the price. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Health Care peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
19/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield3.2%
Free-cash-flow yield2.5%
Fair value vs price0.8×
GrowthWeak
33/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)0.9%
EPS growth (3y)3.1%
Growth consistency70%
ProfitabilityStrong
75/100
Earns high returns on the capital it uses.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital46.4%
Operating margin28.2%
Gross profitability67.9%
Financial healthFair
58/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score6 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.8×
Interest cover16.8×
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
-4.6%Mar '25
+3.9%Jun '25
+7.9%Sep '25
+8.1%Dec '25
+7.2%Mar '26
+4.5%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $1.0B, diluted EPS $11.55.
Other Life Sciences Tools & Services companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Mettler Toledo International Inc/
Strengthsinside the company
Return on invested capital is 46.4%, against a median of 8.5% for industry peers.
Operating margin of 28.2% is well above the 18.6% median of industry peers, a sign of pricing power or lower costs.
Operating profit covers interest 17x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Weaknessesinside the company
No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
The price is 19% above our fair value estimate, so there is little room for disappointment.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare MTD with peers and sector
Medians of 8 Life Sciences Tools & Services peers and of 59 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): TMO34, DHR30, A40, IQV43, WAT33, ILMN39.
Metric
MTD
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
47
37
49
Valuation
19
28
55
Growth
33
28
48
Profitability
75
41
49
Financial health
58
38
48
Dividends
–
45
51
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Health Care
MTD ranks #37 of 60 in Health Care and #1 of 9 in Life Sciences Tools & Services by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for MTD
Each factor is rated by where MTD stands among the 60 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 4 Good · 8 Average · 10 Bad of 22Growth: 0 · 1 · 2Profitability: 4 · 1 · 0Financial strength: 0 · 3 · 1Valuation: 0 · 0 · 5Cash flow: 0 · 2 · 2Efficiency: 0 · 1 · 0
Factor
MTD
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+0.9%
Badbeats 21%
+5.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+4.0%
Badbeats 29%
+7.1%
+4.0%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+3.1%
Averagebeats 45%
+5.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
60.3%
Averagebeats 41%
65.0%
59.2%
≈ In line
Operating margin
28.2%
Goodbeats 84%
16.4%
27.8%
≈ In line
Net margin
21.9%
Goodbeats 82%
11.1%
21.6%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
46.4%
Goodbeats 89%
12.2%
–
–
Return on equity
7,062.4%
Goodbeats 99%
13.7%
–
–
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
1.8x
Averagebeats 60%
2.0x
1.8x
≈ In line
Interest cover
16.8x
Averagebeats 60%
9.4x
16.3x
≈ In line
Current ratio
1.12
Badbeats 23%
1.52
1.11
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
6 / 9
Averagebeats 43%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
37.5x
Badbeats 31%
28.2x
33.8x
▼ Worse
Price / book
2,649.4x
Badbeats 1%
3.7x
–
–
Price / sales
8.2x
Badbeats 18%
3.7x
7.2x
▼ Worse
EV / EBITDA
30.9x
Badbeats 22%
17.6x
27.7x
▼ Worse
Free cash flow yield
2.5%
Badbeats 16%
4.4%
2.9%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
20.9%
Averagebeats 64%
16.3%
21.6%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
1.08
Badbeats 9%
1.61
1.12
≈ In line
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+4.8%
Averagebeats 54%
+4.3%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−1.9%
Badbeats 19%
−3.9%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
65 days
Averagebeats 45%
62 days
65 days
≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 4 Good · ● 6 Average · ● 6 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Good
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Bad
Growth consistencyBad
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverAverage
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginGood
Gross profitabilityGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 46/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$3.7B
$3.9B
$3.8B
$3.9B
$4.0B
Operating income
$993M
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
Net income
$769M
$873M
$789M
$863M
$869M
Operating cash flow
$909M
$859M
$966M
$968M
$956M
Operating margin
26.7%
28.7%
27.7%
28.7%
27.8%
Free cash flow
$801M
$738M
$861M
$864M
$849M
Diluted EPS
$32.78
$38.41
$35.90
$40.48
$42.05
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
12 bullish · 0 neutral · 4 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 0 neutral · 1 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
1,620.4
Bullish
EMA 10
1,623.7
Bullish
SMA 20
1,570.7
Bullish
EMA 20
1,574.9
Bullish
SMA 50
1,461.4
Bullish
EMA 50
1,486.8
Bullish
SMA 100
1,370.9
Bullish
EMA 100
1,414.3
Bullish
SMA 200
1,331.3
Bullish
EMA 200
1,361.4
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
77.61
Bearish
MACD (12, 26)
60.94
Bullish
Momentum (12)
9.89
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
87.73
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-12.27
Bearish
CCI (20)
155.4
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
1,615.5
S2
1,640.8
S1
1,662.7
Pivot
1,688.1
R1
1,710.0
R2
1,735.3
R3
1,757.2
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in MTD among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.