Masco makes home improvement and building products, with brands in plumbing, such as Delta faucets, and in paints and coatings, such as Behr. It also sells cabinets, lighting and other fittings. The company sells through home centers, dealers and professional channels, and earns money from product sales to consumers and contractors. Repair and remodel spending, and new housing activity, are important drivers of demand.
Over the latest twelve months the company reported revenue of $7.7 billion, and annual revenue fell by 4.5% on average across three years. Profitability at the operating level stands at 16.6%, and return on invested capital came to 40%. The company carries net debt of 1.9 times its EBITDA. A dividend is paid, with a yield of 1.6%. It carries an X-Ray Score of 53 out of 100.
52-wk range $58.16 – $83.64Volume 2,764,488Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$15.9B
52-week range$58.16 – $83.64
Volume (last day)2,764,488
P/E (TTM)19.4
EBIT / EV yield6.8%
Free-cash-flow yield5.9%
Dividend yield1.6%
Revenue (TTM)$7.7B
Net income (TTM)$837M
Operating margin16.6%
Return on capital39.6%
Debt incl. leases$3.1B
Cash & securities$388M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$68middle half of models $64 – $77
Fair−12.6% to fair value
Average of the 14 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $78
Undervalued < $58Fair $58 – $83Overvalued > $83
P/E multiple
$77
P/S multiple
$77
EV/EBITDA multiple
$79
EV/EBIT multiple
$75
EV/revenue multiple
$76
10-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$71
5-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$72
10-year DCF, revenue exit
$71
5-year DCF, revenue exit
$72
10-year DCF, growth exit
$62
5-year DCF, growth exit
$61
Dividend discount, stable
$33
Dividend discount, multi-stage
$35
Earnings power value
$93
Growth the price implies
7.8%/yr
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Industrials peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationFair
64/100
Priced about in line with its sector.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield6.8%
Free-cash-flow yield5.9%
Fair value vs price0.9×
GrowthWeak
18/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)-4.5%
EPS growth (3y)2.1%
Growth consistency20%
ProfitabilityStrong
76/100
Earns high returns on the capital it uses.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital39.6%
Operating margin16.6%
Gross profitability52.0%
Financial healthWeak
45/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score6 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.9×
Interest cover12.7×
DividendsFair
52/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield1.6%
Dividends vs free cash flow27%
Dividend growth0.4%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
-2.9%Dec '24
-6.5%Mar '25
-1.9%Jun '25
-3.3%Sep '25
-1.9%Dec '25
+6.5%Mar '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $1.9B, diluted EPS $1.05.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare MAS with peers and sector
Medians of 6 Building Products peers and of 80 Industrials stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): TT56, JCI31, CARR27, ALLE59, LII59, AOS65.
Metric
MAS
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
53
58
50
Valuation
64
44
44
Growth
18
50
51
Profitability
76
59
50
Financial health
44
51
49
Dividends
52
54
53
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Industrials
MAS ranks #36 of 81 in Industrials and #5 of 7 in Building Products by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for MAS
Each factor is rated by where MAS stands among the 81 Industrials stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 7 Good · 12 Average · 2 Bad of 21Growth: 0 · 1 · 2Profitability: 1 · 3 · 0Financial strength: 1 · 3 · 0Valuation: 4 · 0 · 0Cash flow: 1 · 3 · 0Efficiency: 0 · 2 · 0
Factor
MAS
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
−4.5%
Badbeats 9%
+5.6%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
−3.4%
Badbeats 7%
+4.5%
−1.7%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+2.1%
Averagebeats 37%
+5.7%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
35.4%
Averagebeats 37%
38.0%
35.4%
≈ In line
Operating margin
16.6%
Averagebeats 45%
17.5%
16.8%
≈ In line
Net margin
10.9%
Averagebeats 43%
12.8%
10.5%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
39.6%
Goodbeats 92%
14.9%
–
–
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
1.9x
Averagebeats 45%
1.8x
1.5x
▼ Worse
Interest cover
12.7x
Averagebeats 38%
21.4x
12.4x
≈ In line
Current ratio
1.75
Goodbeats 78%
1.25
1.75
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
6 / 9
Averagebeats 41%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
19.0x
Goodbeats 82%
28.9x
16.7x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
2.1x
Goodbeats 72%
3.5x
1.9x
≈ In line
EV / EBITDA
13.2x
Goodbeats 83%
18.5x
11.7x
▼ Worse
Free cash flow yield
5.9%
Goodbeats 84%
3.8%
5.7%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
12.3%
Averagebeats 40%
13.8%
11.5%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
1.32
Averagebeats 44%
1.39
1.31
≈ In line
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+12.0%
Averagebeats 35%
+14.5%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−5.0%
Goodbeats 70%
−3.2%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
4.6x
Averagebeats 63%
4.0x
4.8x
≈ In line
Days sales outstanding
63 days
Averagebeats 39%
57 days
50 days
▼ Worse
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 6 Good · ● 8 Average · ● 2 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Free-cash-flow yieldGood
Risk models
Altman Z''Average
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Bad
Growth consistencyBad
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverAverage
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldGood
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginAverage
Gross profitabilityGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 56/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$8.4B
$8.7B
$8.0B
$7.8B
$7.6B
Operating income
$1.4B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.2B
Net income
$410M
$844M
$908M
$822M
$810M
Operating cash flow
$930M
$840M
$1.4B
$1.1B
$1.0B
Operating margin
16.8%
14.9%
16.9%
17.4%
16.5%
Free cash flow
$802M
$616M
$1.2B
$907M
$866M
Diluted EPS
$1.62
$3.63
$4.02
$3.76
$3.86
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
12 bullish · 0 neutral · 4 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
72.26
Bullish
EMA 10
73.14
Bullish
SMA 20
70.45
Bullish
EMA 20
71.61
Bullish
SMA 50
70.81
Bullish
EMA 50
71.33
Bullish
SMA 100
73.26
Bullish
EMA 100
71.40
Bullish
SMA 200
70.16
Bullish
EMA 200
70.46
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
75.17
Bearish
MACD (12, 26)
1.38
Bullish
Momentum (12)
11.61
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
99.43
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-0.57
Bearish
CCI (20)
193.6
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
71.44
S2
72.78
S1
75.42
Pivot
76.76
R1
79.40
R2
80.74
R3
83.38
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
1.27 USD
Yield on today's price
1.63%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
0.3200
0.3200
0.3200
0.3100
0.3100
0.3100
0.3100
0.2900
0.2900
0.2900
0.2900
0.2850
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in MAS among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
MAS stock splits
MAS has split its stock once since 1998. The latest was a 2-for-1 split on 13 Jul 1998.