Intuitive Surgical makes the da Vinci robotic-assisted surgical systems, which surgeons use to perform minimally invasive procedures, along with the Ion system for lung biopsy. Hospitals acquire or lease the systems, and then order instruments, accessories and service plans for them. Revenue therefore combines system sales and leases with recurring income from instruments and services that rise with the number of procedures performed.
Sales reached $11.0 billion in the last twelve months, having grown 17.4% a year over the past three years. Operating profit equals 31.3% of revenue. Return on invested capital is 22%. No dividend is paid. Overall, the X-Ray Score is 62 out of 100. These numbers describe past results and current financial position, and they are shown for reference only.
52-wk range $328.57 – $603.88Volume 2,776,041Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$158.6B
52-week range$328.57 – $603.88
Volume (last day)2,776,041
P/E (TTM)51.0
EBIT / EV yield2.2%
Free-cash-flow yield2.0%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$11.0B
Net income (TTM)$3.1B
Operating margin31.3%
Return on capital22.1%
Debt incl. leasesData missing
Cash & securities$5.2B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$420middle half of models $427 – $522
Fair−5.4% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is High, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Strong business at a fair price
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Health Care peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
26/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield2.2%
Free-cash-flow yield2.0%
Fair value vs price0.9×
GrowthStrong
86/100
Growing faster than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)17.4%
EPS growth (3y)29.2%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityFair
65/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital22.1%
Operating margin31.3%
Gross profitability35.2%
Financial healthStrong
80/100
Balance sheet looks strong: debt is well covered.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score7 / 9
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+19.2%Mar '25
+21.4%Jun '25
+22.9%Sep '25
+18.8%Dec '25
+23.0%Mar '26
+18.5%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $2.9B, diluted EPS $2.29.
Other Health Care Equipment companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Intuitive Surgical Inc
Strengthsinside the company
Return on invested capital is 22.1%, against a median of 10.1% for industry peers.
Operating margin of 31.3% is well above the 18.1% median of industry peers, a sign of pricing power or lower costs.
Revenue has grown 17.4% a year over three years (median 8.5% for industry peers).
Earnings per share have compounded at 29.2% a year over three years.
Weaknessesinside the company
No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
No specific opportunity is visible in our valuation, sector or growth data.
Threatsvaluation and setting
Trades at 50.5x earnings, 71% above the 29.5x median of industry peers, so the price already assumes better results.
Valuation uncertainty is high: the models give widely different values, so the fair value range is wide.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare ISRG with peers and sector
Medians of 15 Health Care Equipment peers and of 59 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): ABT41, MDT57, SYK56, BSX67, BDX47, EW55.
Metric
ISRG
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
62
56
49
Valuation
26
60
55
Growth
86
66
47
Profitability
65
49
49
Financial health
80
55
48
Dividends
–
46
51
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Health Care
ISRG ranks #13 of 60 in Health Care and #7 of 16 in Health Care Equipment by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for ISRG
Each factor is rated by where ISRG stands among the 60 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 11 Good · 3 Average · 8 Bad of 22Growth: 3 · 0 · 0Profitability: 3 · 2 · 0Financial strength: 2 · 1 · 0Valuation: 0 · 0 · 5Cash flow: 2 · 0 · 2Efficiency: 1 · 0 · 1
Factor
ISRG
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+17.4%
Goodbeats 96%
+5.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+20.5%
Goodbeats 94%
+7.1%
+17.2%
▲ Better
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+29.2%
Goodbeats 82%
+5.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
66.7%
Averagebeats 59%
65.0%
67.4%
≈ In line
Operating margin
31.3%
Goodbeats 91%
16.4%
28.1%
▲ Better
Net margin
28.4%
Goodbeats 94%
11.1%
27.8%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
22.1%
Goodbeats 79%
12.2%
–
–
Return on equity
17.3%
Averagebeats 61%
13.7%
14.1%
▲ Better
Financial strength
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 82%
9.4x
–
–
Current ratio
4.96
Goodbeats 98%
1.52
4.76
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
7 / 9
Averagebeats 62%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
50.5x
Badbeats 16%
28.2x
72.6x
▲ Better
Price / book
8.7x
Badbeats 21%
3.7x
11.0x
▲ Better
Price / sales
14.4x
Badbeats 6%
3.7x
20.4x
▲ Better
EV / EBITDA
44.5x
Badbeats 10%
17.6x
–
–
Free cash flow yield
2.0%
Badbeats 7%
4.4%
1.0%
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
29.2%
Goodbeats 92%
16.3%
15.6%
▲ Better
Cash from operations / net income
1.18
Badbeats 21%
1.61
1.06
▲ Better
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+37.5%
Goodbeats 87%
+4.3%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−2.7%
Badbeats 33%
−3.9%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
1.8x
Badbeats 22%
2.9x
2.0x
≈ In line
Days sales outstanding
55 days
Goodbeats 69%
62 days
55 days
≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 9 Good · ● 4 Average · ● 2 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashAverage
Free-cash-flow yieldBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Good
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Good
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Good
Revenue growth (3y)Good
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldBad
Profitability
Return on invested capitalGood
Operating marginGood
Gross profitabilityAverage
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 64/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$5.7B
$6.2B
$7.1B
$8.4B
$10.1B
Operating income
$1.8B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$2.3B
$2.9B
Net income
$1.7B
$1.3B
$1.8B
$2.3B
$2.9B
Operating cash flow
$2.1B
$1.5B
$1.8B
$2.4B
$3.0B
Operating margin
31.9%
25.3%
24.8%
28.1%
29.3%
Free cash flow
$1.7B
$958M
$750M
$1.3B
$2.5B
Diluted EPS
$4.66
$3.65
$5.03
$6.42
$7.87
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Strongly bullish
12 bullish · 1 neutral · 3 bearish
Weekly
Bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 4 bearish
Monthly
Neutral
3 bullish · 1 neutral · 4 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
429.2
Bullish
EMA 10
428.7
Bullish
SMA 20
418.2
Bullish
EMA 20
419.0
Bullish
SMA 50
395.0
Bullish
EMA 50
404.3
Bullish
SMA 100
393.5
Bullish
EMA 100
407.1
Bullish
SMA 200
436.9
Bullish
EMA 200
429.1
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
67.92
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
12.25
Bullish
Momentum (12)
9.66
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
99.45
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-0.55
Bearish
CCI (20)
137.8
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
416.2
S2
421.8
S1
432.8
Pivot
438.5
R1
449.5
R2
455.2
R3
466.2
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in ISRG among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
ISRG stock splits
ISRG has split its stock 3 times since 2003. The latest was a 3-for-1 split on 5 Oct 2021.