Iqvia provides services and technology to the life sciences industry, helping drug, biotech and medical device companies plan and run clinical trials, analyse health data and bring products to market. Its customers include pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms, medical device makers and healthcare organisations. The company is organised around technology and analytics solutions, research and development solutions, and contract sales and medical solutions, drawing on large stores of healthcare data.
Revenue comes from multi-year research contracts and from data, analytics and technology services supplied to life sciences clients. It totals $16.6 billion over the last twelve months, growing at 4.2% a year across the last three years. The operating margin is 13.2%, and the business earns a profit of 9% on the capital invested in it. Iqvia carries net debt of 4.1 times EBITDA and does not pay a dividend. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 43 out of 100.
52-wk range $154.50 – $282.98Volume 1,672,402Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$47.3B
52-week range$154.50 – $282.98
Volume (last day)1,672,402
P/E (TTM)34.6
EBIT / EV yield3.6%
Free-cash-flow yield4.5%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$16.6B
Net income (TTM)$1.4B
Operating margin13.2%
Return on capital9.3%
Debt incl. leases$15.8B
Cash & securities$2.1B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$278middle half of models $252 – $313
Fair−0.1% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is High, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, fairly priced
The price sits inside our fair-value band. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Health Care peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
50/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield3.6%
Free-cash-flow yield4.5%
Fair value vs price1.0×
GrowthFair
56/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)4.2%
EPS growth (3y)11.1%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityFair
52/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital9.3%
Operating margin13.2%
Financial healthWeak
11/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score4 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA4.1×
Interest cover2.9×
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+2.3%Dec '24
+2.5%Mar '25
+5.3%Jun '25
+5.2%Sep '25
+10.3%Dec '25
+8.4%Mar '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $4.2B, diluted EPS $1.61.
Other Life Sciences Tools & Services companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Iqvia Holdings Inc.
Strengthsinside the company
No standout strength in the figures we track.
Weaknessesinside the company
Net debt is 4.1x EBITDA, above the 3x level that lenders usually watch.
Operating profit covers interest only 2.9x.
Altman Z-score of 1.2 is in the zone linked with financial distress in past studies.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
Heavy debt makes profits sensitive to interest rates and refinancing conditions.
Valuation uncertainty is high: the models give widely different values, so the fair value range is wide.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare IQV with peers and sector
Medians of 8 Life Sciences Tools & Services peers and of 59 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): TMO34, DHR30, A40, WAT33, ILMN39, MTD47.
Metric
IQV
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
43
37
49
Valuation
50
23
55
Growth
56
28
47
Profitability
52
41
49
Financial health
11
45
48
Dividends
–
45
51
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Health Care
IQV ranks #43 of 60 in Health Care and #3 of 9 in Life Sciences Tools & Services by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for IQV
Each factor is rated by where IQV stands among the 60 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 2 Good · 13 Average · 6 Bad of 21Growth: 0 · 3 · 0Profitability: 1 · 3 · 0Financial strength: 0 · 0 · 4Valuation: 0 · 4 · 1Cash flow: 1 · 3 · 0Efficiency: 0 · 0 · 1
Factor
IQV
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+4.2%
Averagebeats 43%
+5.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+5.9%
Averagebeats 39%
+7.1%
+4.0%
≈ In line
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+11.1%
Averagebeats 66%
+5.0%
–
–
Profitability
Operating margin
13.2%
Averagebeats 41%
16.4%
13.2%
≈ In line
Net margin
8.3%
Averagebeats 35%
11.1%
8.3%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
9.3%
Averagebeats 38%
12.2%
–
–
Return on equity
22.3%
Goodbeats 73%
13.7%
20.9%
≈ In line
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
4.1x
Badbeats 13%
2.0x
3.9x
≈ In line
Interest cover
2.9x
Badbeats 14%
9.4x
3.3x
≈ In line
Current ratio
0.75
Badbeats 1%
1.52
0.86
▼ Worse
Piotroski F-score
4 / 9
Badbeats 10%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
34.1x
Averagebeats 39%
28.2x
31.7x
≈ In line
Price / book
7.6x
Badbeats 26%
3.7x
6.8x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
2.8x
Averagebeats 57%
3.7x
2.7x
≈ In line
EV / EBITDA
18.2x
Averagebeats 48%
17.6x
17.2x
≈ In line
Free cash flow yield
4.5%
Averagebeats 53%
4.4%
4.2%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
12.7%
Averagebeats 36%
16.3%
12.6%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
1.95
Goodbeats 83%
1.61
1.98
≈ In line
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+8.9%
Averagebeats 62%
+4.3%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−4.4%
Averagebeats 65%
−3.9%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
73 days
Badbeats 23%
62 days
76 days
≈ In line
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 1 Good · ● 9 Average · ● 5 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashAverage
Free-cash-flow yieldAverage
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreBad
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDABad
Interest coverBad
Valuation
Fair value vs priceAverage
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginAverage
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 42/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$13.9B
$14.4B
$15.0B
$15.4B
$16.3B
Operating income
$1.4B
$1.8B
$2.0B
$2.2B
$2.2B
Net income
$966M
$1.1B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.4B
Operating cash flow
$2.9B
$2.3B
$2.1B
$2.7B
$2.7B
Operating margin
10.0%
12.5%
13.2%
14.3%
13.4%
Free cash flow
$2.3B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$2.1B
$2.1B
Diluted EPS
$4.95
$5.72
$7.29
$7.49
$7.84
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Strongly bullish
12 bullish · 1 neutral · 3 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 0 neutral · 1 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
267.1
Bullish
EMA 10
269.2
Bullish
SMA 20
265.6
Bullish
EMA 20
266.7
Bullish
SMA 50
262.5
Bullish
EMA 50
257.5
Bullish
SMA 100
233.3
Bullish
EMA 100
240.1
Bullish
SMA 200
208.6
Bullish
EMA 200
221.8
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
64.72
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
3.08
Bullish
Momentum (12)
7.05
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
84.68
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-15.32
Bearish
CCI (20)
187.6
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
264.6
S2
269.2
S1
273.8
Pivot
278.4
R1
282.9
R2
287.5
R3
292.1
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in IQV among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.