Cigna Group is a health services company with two main parts: Evernorth, which includes pharmacy benefit management through Express Scripts and specialty care services, and Cigna Healthcare, which sells medical, dental and other insurance plans. Revenue comes from insurance premiums, fees for managing prescription drug benefits and the dispensing of medicines, and it depends on medical costs and regulation.
Over the last twelve months Cigna Group reported revenue of $282.4 billion. Over three years revenue has grown by 15.0% a year. The operating margin is 3.5%. Return on invested capital is 12%. Net debt to EBITDA is 2.0 times. It pays a dividend with a yield of 2.0%. The X-Ray Score is 66 out of 100. Return on invested capital describes how much profit the business earns relative to the money put into it.
52-wk range $239.51 – $316.27Volume 1,575,611Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$83.4B
52-week range$239.51 – $316.27
Volume (last day)1,575,611
P/E (TTM)13.5
EBIT / EV yield9.1%
Free-cash-flow yield–
Dividend yield2.0%
Revenue (TTM)$282.4B
Net income (TTM)$6.2B
Operating margin3.5%
Return on capital11.8%
Debt incl. leases$32.9B
Cash & securities$7.3B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$460middle half of models $347 – $563
Undervalued+45.8% to fair value
Average of the 10 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Weak business, but the price is low
Our models put fair value above today's price, but models can be wrong, so check the business first. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Health Care peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationStrong
96/100
Cheap against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield9.1%
Fair value vs price1.5×
GrowthFair
68/100
Growing at a typical pace for its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)15.0%
EPS growth (3y)1.2%
Growth consistency100%
ProfitabilityFair
51/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital11.8%
Operating margin3.5%
Gross profitability37.1%
Financial healthWeak
48/100
Balance sheet is more stretched than most peers.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score8 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA2.0×
Interest cover7.2×
DividendsFair
63/100
Dividend is typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield2.0%
Dividend growth5.2%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
+14.4%Mar '25
+11.0%Jun '25
+9.5%Sep '25
+10.4%Dec '25
+4.6%Mar '26
+6.7%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $71.7B, diluted EPS $6.29.
Other Health Care Services companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Cigna Group
Strengthsinside the company
Revenue has grown 15.0% a year over three years (median 5.5% for industry peers).
Passes 8 of the 9 Piotroski tests, which points to improving profitability, funding and efficiency.
Weaknessesinside the company
Operating margin of 3.5% is thin against 12.3% for industry peers.
Altman Z-score of 1.5 is in the zone linked with financial distress in past studies.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Trades at 13.4x earnings, 47% below the 25.3x median of industry peers.
The price is 46% below our fair value estimate, with the gap larger than the margin we allow for error.
Price momentum is strong on the weekly and monthly signals (trends can reverse).
Threatsvaluation and setting
No specific threat is flagged by our checks; general market and interest-rate risk still applies.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare CI with peers and sector
Medians of 4 Health Care Services peers and of 59 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): CVS52, DGX56, LH44, DVA67.
Metric
CI
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
66
54
49
Valuation
96
68
52
Growth
68
49
47
Profitability
51
47
49
Financial health
48
50
48
Dividends
63
55
50
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Health Care
CI ranks #8 of 60 in Health Care and #2 of 5 in Health Care Services by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for CI
Each factor is rated by where CI stands among the 60 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 9 Good · 6 Average · 6 Bad of 21Growth: 2 · 1 · 0Profitability: 0 · 2 · 3Financial strength: 1 · 2 · 1Valuation: 4 · 0 · 0Cash flow: 0 · 1 · 2Efficiency: 2 · 0 · 0
Factor
CI
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+15.0%
Goodbeats 91%
+5.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+11.2%
Goodbeats 76%
+7.1%
+8.5%
▲ Better
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+1.2%
Averagebeats 36%
+5.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
20.6%
Badbeats 9%
65.0%
30.8%
▼ Worse
Operating margin
3.5%
Badbeats 21%
16.4%
4.4%
≈ In line
Net margin
2.2%
Badbeats 20%
11.1%
2.6%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
11.8%
Averagebeats 49%
12.2%
–
–
Return on equity
14.6%
Averagebeats 56%
13.7%
11.5%
▲ Better
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
2.0x
Averagebeats 48%
2.0x
2.0x
≈ In line
Interest cover
7.2x
Averagebeats 40%
9.4x
6.3x
≈ In line
Current ratio
0.85
Badbeats 8%
1.52
0.83
≈ In line
Piotroski F-score
8 / 9
Goodbeats 85%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
13.4x
Goodbeats 92%
28.2x
15.3x
▲ Better
Price / book
2.0x
Goodbeats 88%
3.7x
1.9x
≈ In line
Price / sales
0.3x
Goodbeats 91%
3.7x
0.4x
≈ In line
EV / EBITDA
8.6x
Goodbeats 94%
17.6x
9.7x
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
3.6%
Badbeats 15%
16.3%
4.2%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
1.65
Averagebeats 58%
1.61
1.61
≈ In line
Accruals (lower is better)
−2.6%
Badbeats 29%
−3.9%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
38.3x
Goodbeats 99%
2.9x
27.3x
▲ Better
Days sales outstanding
40 days
Goodbeats 84%
62 days
35 days
▼ Worse
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 5 Good · ● 5 Average · ● 4 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Risk models
Altman Z''Bad
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Revenue growth (3y)Good
Growth consistencyGood
Balance sheet
Current ratioBad
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverAverage
Valuation
Fair value vs priceGood
EBIT / EV yieldGood
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginBad
Gross profitabilityAverage
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 54/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$174.1B
$180.5B
$195.3B
$247.1B
$274.9B
Operating income
$7.9B
$8.5B
$8.5B
$9.4B
$9.2B
Net income
$5.4B
$6.8B
$5.2B
$3.4B
$6.0B
Operating cash flow
$7.2B
$8.7B
$11.8B
$10.4B
$9.6B
Operating margin
4.6%
4.7%
4.4%
3.8%
3.3%
Free cash flow
–
–
–
–
–
Diluted EPS
$15.75
$21.41
$17.39
$12.12
$22.18
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bullish
12 bullish · 0 neutral · 4 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bullish
11 bullish · 1 neutral · 0 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bullish
6 bullish · 1 neutral · 1 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
296.4
Bullish
EMA 10
298.4
Bullish
SMA 20
284.9
Bullish
EMA 20
290.5
Bullish
SMA 50
280.7
Bullish
EMA 50
284.0
Bullish
SMA 100
282.4
Bullish
EMA 100
281.8
Bullish
SMA 200
278.5
Bullish
EMA 200
281.2
Bullish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
75.32
Bearish
MACD (12, 26)
8.26
Bullish
Momentum (12)
15.13
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
99.23
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-0.77
Bearish
CCI (20)
158.8
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
296.7
S2
300.7
S1
308.3
Pivot
312.3
R1
319.9
R2
323.9
R3
331.5
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
6.19 USD
Yield on today's price
1.96%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
1.5600
1.5600
1.5600
1.5100
1.5100
1.5100
1.5100
1.4000
1.4000
1.4000
1.4000
1.2300
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in CI among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
CI stock splits
CI has split its stock 2 times since 1998. The latest was a 3-for-1 split on 5 Jun 2007.