C.H. Robinson is an asset-light third-party logistics company that arranges the movement of freight for shippers. It uses a large network of carriers to move truckload and less-than-truckload freight, and it also offers ocean, air and customs services through its global forwarding business. Customers include manufacturers, retailers and food producers, and its Navisphere technology platform connects them with carriers.
The company earns revenue from freight charges billed to shippers, and keeps the gap over what it pays carriers. Sales for the last twelve months came to $17.0 billion, but revenue growth over the last three years was -13.1% a year. The operating margin is 4.9%, while the business earns a profit of 20% on the capital invested in it. It carries net debt of 1.9 times EBITDA. A dividend is paid, with a yield of 1.8%. On the site's X-Ray Score it receives 38 out of 100.
52-wk range $125.35 – $210.33Volume 1,251,695Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$16.9B
52-week range$125.35 – $210.33
Volume (last day)1,251,695
P/E (TTM)26.9
EBIT / EV yield4.4%
Free-cash-flow yield3.9%
Dividend yield1.8%
Revenue (TTM)$17.0B
Net income (TTM)$633M
Operating margin4.9%
Return on capital19.7%
Debt incl. leases$2.0B
Cash & securities$155M
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$116middle half of models $113 – $125
Overvalued−18.8% to fair value
Average of the 15 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
Price $141
Undervalued < $98Fair $98 – $140Overvalued > $140
P/E multiple
$141
P/B multiple
$115
P/S multiple
$118
EV/EBITDA multiple
$124
EV/EBIT multiple
$131
EV/revenue multiple
$126
10-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$115
5-year DCF, EBITDA exit
$121
10-year DCF, revenue exit
$114
5-year DCF, revenue exit
$118
10-year DCF, growth exit
$85
5-year DCF, growth exit
$83
Dividend discount, stable
$100
Dividend discount, multi-stage
$129
Earnings power value
$112
Growth the price implies
14.8%/yr
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business, priced high
Our models put fair value below today's price, so a lot of good news may already be in the price. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Industrials peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationWeak
33/100
Expensive against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield4.4%
Free-cash-flow yield3.9%
Fair value vs price0.8×
GrowthWeak
7/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)-13.1%
EPS growth (3y)-13.3%
Growth consistency30%
ProfitabilityWeak
44/100
Earns lower returns on its capital than most peers.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital19.7%
Operating margin4.9%
Financial healthFair
68/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score7 / 9
Net debt / EBITDA1.9×
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsWeak
36/100
Dividend is modest or less certain than peers.
See the numbers →
Dividend yield1.8%
Dividends vs free cash flow45%
Dividend growth1.8%
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
-8.3%Mar '25
-7.7%Jun '25
-10.9%Sep '25
-6.5%Dec '25
-0.8%Mar '26
+19.3%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $4.9B, diluted EPS $1.56.
Other Air Freight & Logistics companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
Strengthsinside the company
Return on invested capital is 19.7%, against a median of 14.7% for industry peers.
Operating profit covers interest 50x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Passes 7 of the 9 Piotroski tests, which points to improving profitability, funding and efficiency.
Weaknessesinside the company
Revenue has fallen 13.1% a year over three years (median -4.0% for industry peers).
Earnings per share have declined 13.3% a year over three years.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
Dividends use only 45% of free cash flow, which leaves room to raise them.
Threatsvaluation and setting
The price is 19% above our fair value estimate, so there is little room for disappointment.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare CHRW with peers and sector
Medians of 3 Air Freight & Logistics peers and of 80 Industrials stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): UPS44, FDX54, EXPD45.
Metric
CHRW
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
38
45
51
Valuation
33
77
48
Growth
7
20
51
Profitability
44
48
51
Financial health
68
37
49
Dividends
36
48
53
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Industrials
CHRW ranks #70 of 81 in Industrials and #4 of 4 in Air Freight & Logistics by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for CHRW
Each factor is rated by where CHRW stands among the 81 Industrials stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 5 Good · 5 Average · 11 Bad of 21Growth: 0 · 0 · 3Profitability: 1 · 1 · 2Financial strength: 3 · 1 · 0Valuation: 1 · 3 · 1Cash flow: 0 · 0 · 4Efficiency: 0 · 0 · 1
Factor
CHRW
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
−13.1%
Badbeats 4%
+5.6%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
−8.4%
Badbeats 4%
+4.5%
+0.7%
▼ Worse
EPS growth, 3 years a year
−13.3%
Badbeats 10%
+5.7%
–
–
Profitability
Operating margin
4.9%
Badbeats 7%
17.5%
4.7%
≈ In line
Net margin
3.7%
Badbeats 8%
12.8%
3.6%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
19.7%
Averagebeats 66%
14.9%
–
–
Return on equity
38.9%
Goodbeats 77%
23.7%
31.8%
▲ Better
Financial strength
Net debt / EBITDA
1.9x
Averagebeats 42%
1.8x
1.4x
▼ Worse
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 76%
21.4x
–
–
Current ratio
1.58
Goodbeats 70%
1.25
1.40
▲ Better
Piotroski F-score
7 / 9
Goodbeats 68%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
26.9x
Averagebeats 56%
28.9x
26.8x
≈ In line
Price / book
10.5x
Badbeats 28%
6.2x
7.3x
▼ Worse
Price / sales
1.0x
Goodbeats 88%
3.5x
0.6x
▼ Worse
EV / EBITDA
20.2x
Averagebeats 39%
18.5x
17.9x
▼ Worse
Free cash flow yield
3.9%
Averagebeats 52%
3.8%
4.6%
≈ In line
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
3.9%
Badbeats 4%
13.8%
4.0%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
1.08
Badbeats 13%
1.39
1.56
▼ Worse
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
−17.4%
Badbeats 9%
+14.5%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−0.9%
Badbeats 15%
−3.2%
–
–
Efficiency
Days sales outstanding
66 days
Badbeats 29%
57 days
49 days
▼ Worse
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 4 Good · ● 4 Average · ● 7 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashBad
Free-cash-flow yieldAverage
Risk models
Altman Z''Good
Piotroski F-ScoreGood
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Bad
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Bad
Revenue growth (3y)Bad
Growth consistencyBad
Balance sheet
Current ratioGood
Net debt / EBITDAAverage
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceBad
EBIT / EV yieldAverage
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginBad
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 35/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$23.1B
$24.7B
$17.6B
$17.7B
$16.2B
Operating income
$1.1B
$1.3B
$515M
$669M
$795M
Net income
$844M
$941M
$325M
$466M
$587M
Operating cash flow
$95M
$1.7B
$732M
$509M
$915M
Operating margin
4.7%
5.1%
2.9%
3.8%
4.9%
Free cash flow
$61M
$1.6B
$702M
$486M
$895M
Diluted EPS
$6.31
$7.40
$2.72
$3.86
$4.83
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Bearish
2 bullish · 4 neutral · 10 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bearish
2 bullish · 1 neutral · 9 bearish
Monthly
Bearish
2 bullish · 1 neutral · 5 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
140.4
Bullish
EMA 10
141.2
Bearish
SMA 20
142.8
Bearish
EMA 20
142.8
Bearish
SMA 50
146.3
Bearish
EMA 50
148.6
Bearish
SMA 100
163.1
Bearish
EMA 100
156.1
Bearish
SMA 200
169.4
Bearish
EMA 200
157.8
Bearish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
45.68
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-2.38
Bearish
Momentum (12)
4.43
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
61.17
Neutral
Williams %R (14)
-38.83
Neutral
CCI (20)
-26.22
Neutral
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
136.8
S2
138.0
S1
139.6
Pivot
140.7
R1
142.3
R2
143.5
R3
145.1
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
Dividends
Paid, last 12 months
2.52 USD
Yield on today's price
1.79%
Frequency
Quarterly
Next ex-dividend date
Not announced
Ex-dividend date
Amount per share
0.6300
0.6300
0.6300
0.6300
0.6200
0.6200
0.6200
0.6200
0.6200
0.6100
0.6100
0.6100
Ex-dividend dates and amounts from EODHD. Shown as declared, before tax.
The eight funds with the largest weight in CHRW among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.
CHRW stock splits
CHRW has split its stock 2 times since 2000. The latest was a 2-for-1 split on 17 Oct 2005.