Align Technology makes the Invisalign system of clear aligners used to straighten teeth, along with digital scanners and software that dentists and orthodontists use to plan treatment. The company sells aligners and scanners to dental practices, which in turn treat patients. Revenue is earned from the number of aligner cases shipped and from sales of scanning equipment and related services. Its results depend on consumer spending on elective dental care.
Revenue for the last twelve months was $4.1 billion, and it grew by 2.6% a year over three years. The operating margin is 13.2%, and return on invested capital reached 13%. It does not pay a dividend. Its X-Ray Score is 61 out of 100.
52-wk range $130.23 – $200.44Volume 1,159,666Daily, split-adjusted
Vitals
Market cap$11.1B
52-week range$130.23 – $200.44
Volume (last day)1,159,666
P/E (TTM)27.1
EBIT / EV yield5.5%
Free-cash-flow yield5.7%
Dividend yieldNo dividend
Revenue (TTM)$4.1B
Net income (TTM)$413M
Operating margin13.2%
Return on capital12.7%
Debt incl. leasesData missing
Cash & securities$1.1B
Debt = borrowings plus lease liabilities. Cash & securities = cash, equivalents and short-term marketable securities (long-term securities are not counted, so net cash can be understated for companies that hold large long-term investments). Net debt = debt minus cash & securities. Source: latest SEC 10-Q/10-K. EBIT / EV yield = operating profit divided by market cap plus net debt.
Fair value estimate
$185middle half of models $175 – $200
Undervalued+18.8% to fair value
Average of the 13 valuation models that pass our checks: multiples, discounted cash flow, dividend discount and earnings power value. A model more than 100% above or 60% below the price is left out as unrealistic. Model uncertainty is Medium, based on how far apart the models are. Undervalued or Overvalued means the gap to fair value is more than 17.5%.
A model estimate, not a price target or recommendation. Inputs: risk-free 5.13%, equity risk premium 4.30% (Damodaran). How it works.
What this means
Average business at a low price
Our models put fair value above today's price, but models can be wrong, so check the business first. A high score does not guarantee a good outcome; it shifts the odds a little. Use the checklist as a prompt for your own research.
Before you invest · decision checklist
Ticked boxes are filled in from our data; the rest are yours to answer.
The five-lens scan
Every score explained in one sentence, ranked against Health Care peers. Open a lens to see the numbers behind it.
Strong: 70 to 100Fair: 50 to 69Weak: under 50No score: not enough data
ValuationStrong
76/100
Cheap against its sector on earnings and cash flow.
See the numbers →
EBIT / EV yield5.5%
Free-cash-flow yield5.7%
Fair value vs price1.2×
GrowthWeak
41/100
Growing slower than most of its sector.
See the numbers →
Revenue growth (3y)2.6%
EPS growth (3y)7.0%
Growth consistency80%
ProfitabilityFair
57/100
Returns on capital are typical for its sector.
See the numbers →
Return on invested capital12.7%
Operating margin13.2%
Gross profitability43.9%
Financial healthFair
68/100
Balance sheet is in typical shape for its sector.
See the numbers →
Piotroski F-Score7 / 9
Interest coverNo interest cost
DividendsNone
–/100
Pays no dividend.
See the numbers →
Quarterly results: last 6 quarters
-1.8%Mar '25
-1.6%Jun '25
+1.8%Sep '25
+5.3%Dec '25
+6.2%Mar '26
+4.3%Jun '26
Revenue against the same quarter a year earlier. Latest quarter revenue $1.1B, diluted EPS $1.51.
Other Health Care Supplies companies by X-Ray Score.
SWOT analysis: Align Technology Inc
Strengthsinside the company
Free cash flow equals 5.7% of the market value, which funds dividends, buybacks or debt paydown.
Operating profit covers interest 50x, so debt costs are a small drag.
Passes 7 of the 9 Piotroski tests, which points to improving profitability, funding and efficiency.
Weaknessesinside the company
No clear weakness in the figures we track.
Opportunitiesvaluation and setting
The price is 19% below our fair value estimate, with the gap larger than the margin we allow for error.
Threatsvaluation and setting
No specific threat is flagged by our checks; general market and interest-rate risk still applies.
Written by fixed rules from the figures on this page and the peer table below: filings, our fair value, the sector climate and the price trend. It summarises the data, it is not a forecast or advice.
Compare ALGN with peers and sector
Medians of 59 Health Care peers and of 59 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Largest peers (X-Ray Score): LLY62, JNJ49, ABBV41, UNH58, MRK33, TMO34.
Metric
ALGN
Peers
Sector
X-Ray Score (out of 100)
61
49
49
Valuation
76
52
52
Growth
41
48
48
Profitability
57
49
49
Financial health
68
48
48
Dividends
–
51
51
Sector leaders: highest X-Ray Score in Health Care
ALGN ranks #16 of 60 in Health Care by X-Ray Score. A higher score is stronger on our five pillars; it is a ranking of facts, not a forecast.
Green means better than the peer median, red worse (only where a higher or lower figure is clearly better). A dash means too few companies report the figure. P/E, EV/EBITDA and price changes are not graded: a different level is not good or bad by itself.
Factor ratings for ALGN
Each factor is rated by where ALGN stands among the 60 Health Care stocks in our universe.
Rating against the sector
Goodthe top third of these stocks
Averagethe middle third of these stocks
Badthe bottom third of these stocks
"Beats" is the share of those stocks it is ahead of.
Against its own history
The last columns set today's figure against the company's own median of its last five financial years:
▲ Betterbetter than its usual level
▼ Worseworse than its usual level
≈ In linewithin its usual range
For valuation factors Good means cheaper than most of the sector and Better means cheaper than usual for this company, which is not the same as a bargain.
In total: 7 Good · 13 Average · 2 Bad of 22Growth: 0 · 2 · 1Profitability: 0 · 5 · 0Financial strength: 1 · 2 · 0Valuation: 2 · 3 · 0Cash flow: 3 · 1 · 0Efficiency: 1 · 0 · 1
Factor
ALGN
Rating
Sector median
Own 5-year median
Against own history
Growth
Revenue growth, 3 years a year
+2.6%
Averagebeats 34%
+5.5%
–
–
Revenue growth, last year
+0.9%
Badbeats 14%
+7.1%
+3.4%
▼ Worse
EPS growth, 3 years a year
+7.0%
Averagebeats 56%
+5.0%
–
–
Profitability
Gross margin
68.0%
Averagebeats 63%
65.0%
70.1%
≈ In line
Operating margin
13.2%
Averagebeats 43%
16.4%
16.7%
▼ Worse
Net margin
10.0%
Averagebeats 49%
11.1%
10.5%
≈ In line
Return on invested capital
12.7%
Averagebeats 54%
12.2%
–
–
Return on equity
9.8%
Averagebeats 35%
13.7%
10.9%
≈ In line
Financial strength
Interest cover
50.0x
Goodbeats 82%
9.4x
–
–
Current ratio
1.40
Averagebeats 46%
1.52
1.26
▲ Better
Piotroski F-score
7 / 9
Averagebeats 62%
6 / 9
–
–
Valuation
P/E ratio
26.9x
Averagebeats 61%
28.2x
45.7x
▲ Better
Price / book
2.6x
Goodbeats 74%
3.7x
4.6x
▲ Better
Price / sales
2.7x
Averagebeats 63%
3.7x
4.4x
▲ Better
EV / EBITDA
12.5x
Goodbeats 83%
17.6x
–
–
Free cash flow yield
5.7%
Averagebeats 66%
4.4%
2.9%
▲ Better
Cash flow
Free cash flow margin
15.3%
Averagebeats 41%
16.3%
15.6%
≈ In line
Cash from operations / net income
1.83
Goodbeats 72%
1.61
1.57
▲ Better
Free cash flow growth, 3 years a year
+21.0%
Goodbeats 74%
+4.3%
–
–
Accruals (lower is better)
−5.3%
Goodbeats 74%
−3.9%
–
–
Efficiency
Inventory turnover
6.2x
Goodbeats 83%
2.9x
4.4x
▲ Better
Days sales outstanding
101 days
Badbeats 5%
62 days
85 days
▼ Worse
These ratings compare companies with each other and describe the past; they are not a forecast, a recommendation or part of the X-Ray Score. A factor is left out when its data is missing or meaningless (for example a P/E on negative earnings). A dash in the history columns means fewer than three usable years.
Fundamentals checklist
● 7 Good · ● 7 Average · ● 1 Bad
Cash quality
Earnings backed by cashGood
Free-cash-flow yieldAverage
Risk models
Altman Z''Good
Piotroski F-ScoreAverage
Growth
EPS growth (3y)Average
Free-cash-flow growth (3y)Good
Revenue growth (3y)Average
Growth consistencyBad
Balance sheet
Current ratioAverage
Interest coverGood
Valuation
Fair value vs priceGood
EBIT / EV yieldGood
Profitability
Return on invested capitalAverage
Operating marginAverage
Gross profitabilityGood
Each check is graded against the company's sector, not a fixed number. Checklist score 63/100.
Financials
FY21
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
Revenue
$4.0B
$3.7B
$3.9B
$4.0B
$4.0B
Operating income
$976M
$643M
$643M
$608M
$546M
Net income
$772M
$362M
$445M
$421M
$410M
Operating cash flow
$1.2B
$569M
$786M
$738M
$593M
Operating margin
24.7%
17.2%
16.7%
15.2%
13.5%
Free cash flow
$771M
$277M
$608M
$623M
$491M
Diluted EPS
$9.69
$4.61
$5.81
$5.62
$5.65
Fiscal years, from SEC filings.
Technical summary
Daily
Neutral
7 bullish · 1 neutral · 8 bearish
Weekly
Strongly bearish
2 bullish · 1 neutral · 9 bearish
Monthly
Strongly bearish
1 bullish · 1 neutral · 6 bearish
Moving averages (daily)
SMA 10
147.4
Bullish
EMA 10
148.8
Bullish
SMA 20
145.4
Bullish
EMA 20
147.8
Bullish
SMA 50
152.5
Bullish
EMA 50
152.6
Bullish
SMA 100
163.7
Bearish
EMA 100
158.9
Bearish
SMA 200
169.3
Bearish
EMA 200
163.9
Bearish
Oscillators (daily)
RSI (14)
62.00
Neutral
MACD (12, 26)
-0.09
Bearish
Momentum (12)
9.94
Bullish
Stochastic %K (14)
97.60
Bearish
Williams %R (14)
-2.40
Bearish
CCI (20)
203.8
Bearish
Pivot points (classic, last session)
S3
148.2
S2
149.8
S1
152.7
Pivot
154.3
R1
157.2
R2
158.8
R3
161.7
Signals describe what the chart is doing, not what to do. Moving averages: price above the average is bullish. Oscillators use the usual thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20; MACD and momentum above zero are bullish). Weekly and monthly views use closing prices only.
The eight funds with the largest weight in ALGN among the ETFs we cover, from each fund's latest SEC Form N-PORT (quarter-end positions, so they can be months old). All ETFs.