Consumer discretionary ETFs
Funds holding companies that sell things people can put off buying: autos, apparel, restaurants, travel, e-commerce and home improvement. 3 funds in this group, ordered by trading volume (lowest expense ratio among those that report one: XLY at 0.08%). Data as of 23 Oct 2026. Educational, not advice.
Consumer discretionary ETFs: price, cost, yield and returns
| # | ETF | Price | Expense ratio | Yield (12m) | 1Y return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sect... | $113.10 | 0.08% | 0.83% | −4.3% |
| 2 | VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary | $378.18 | 0.09% | 0.79% | −3.2% |
| 3 | FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretiona... | $98.23 | 0.08% | 0.79% | −3.2% |
Membership is assigned by StocksXray rules from the fund name, so a fund can appear in several groups and a fund with an unusual name can be missing. Yield is distributions paid in the last 12 months over the latest price; returns are total returns including distributions. Click a column title to sort.
How the consumer discretionary funds differ
The reference fund for this sector is XLY, the Select Sector SPDR for consumer discretionary. It holds the S&P 500 companies in the sector (retail, autos, restaurants, travel and other goods and services people can put off buying), and the eleven Select Sector SPDRs together make up the S&P 500. Funds from other families follow different indexes and hold a somewhat different mix. Funds whose main focus is another sector (biotech funds under technology, for example) are kept off this page.
Among the 3 funds above, the lowest expense ratio is XLY at 0.08% a year and the highest VCR at 0.09% (as reported in SEC prospectus data); three quarters of them charge 0.09% or less. Over the last twelve months total returns ranged from −4.3% to −3.2%, and over five years from +3.7% to +4.1% a year. The narrow spread shows the funds hold broadly the same stocks, so differences between them come mostly from cost, size and trading volume rather than from what they hold.
Other ETF groups
Educational information, not financial advice. Funds can lose value, and past performance does not guarantee future results. Lists describe funds; they are not rankings of quality and not recommendations.